User talk:Dahrez

November 2018
Your recent editing history at Ken Wilber shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ifnord (talk) 23:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your continued edit warring
You should really be discussing you proposed changes on the article's talk page. What it appears to look like is that you're adding language simply to promote the subject, a violation of WP:PUFFERY. As to your question of this being a free encyclopedia, it is without cost. But, you are not "free" to force your opinions into an article. That violates our policy on writing by consensus, please see WP:CON. I personally have no opinions on the subject in the article. But, I do try to keep writing on Wikipedia neutral and factual. Please read more about the five pillar of this encyclopedia before returning to your edit war. (Five pillars) Ifnord (talk) 17:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Ken Wilber
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)