User talk:Daiichi1

Awake (2020 film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Awake (2020 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 03:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Awake (2020 film) poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Awake (2020 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Books of the Heian Period has been nominated for renaming
Category:Books of the Heian Period has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Chang Chun-ha
If anti-drug Jang Jun-ha should be classified as "anti-Japanese sentiment" just because he has experience in the independence movement, almost all South Korean independence activists should be classified as "anti-Japanese sentiment." It is inappropriate because there is a separate classification related to the independence movement.--Storm598 (talk) 00:28, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * And I didn't restore the "anti-Korean sentiment" category even though you deleted it from Japanese articles, but on the contrary, it is a clear double standard for you to restore the category in documents that I don't have specificity to refer to as "anti-Japanese sentiment." (I think characters like Michel Morganella and Yoshiyuki Sadamoto are anti-Korean racists. But I didn't touch it because I didn't want to cause an editorial dispute with you.)--Storm598 (talk) 00:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You're banned from my user talk page if you want to discuss something discuss it on an article talk page. Daiichi1 (talk) 01:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is yet another instance where you removed Category:Anti-Japense sentiment in Korea when it was obviously appropriate for the article. If there's a PoV operating here, it's yours, and it's blatant. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Cool Japan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Use the talk page. RachetPasse (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Discussion started in Talk:Anti-Korean sentiment
Participate in the discussion within 24 hours. The article was reverted to the original version as the discussion started. Npovobsessed (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my Talk addition
You recently undid my revision to Talk:Nippon_Kaigi… which annoyed me initially (as no reason was stated other than WP:TALK, and there have been some edit wars on the main page recently). But it did prompt me to do more research (to justify my planned 'more thorough reposting with full references')… following which I realized that I, like many others (posting on various SNS etc.), had not noticed the nipponkaigi.org/.net difference. Evidently nipponkaigi.net is just another Iceland-based Wikipedia scraper plus machine translation and adverts, which happens to be getting top hits on Google JP for many search terms at the moment. So I stand corrected - thanks. Others have also begun to comment on this, although frankly, if people begin to equate Nippon Kaigi with a poorly translated wiki, that may not be a bad thing either. :) Ozaru (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Im sorry maybe i should have explained more. Talk pages are really only for discussing improvements to Wikipedia articles (resolving content disputes, making suggestions etc.), its not a forum to discuss the topic of the article or other websites. Daiichi1 (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring in Japanese Wikipedia
Your recent editing history at Japanese Wikipedia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Npovobsessed (talk) 22:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Npovobsessed (talk) 00:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Reverting sentences with credible sources in Japanese wikipedia
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --UikiHedeo (talk) 01:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Concern regarding Draft:Awake (2020 film)
Hello, Daiichi1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Awake (2020 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Awake (2020 film)


Hello, Daiichi1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Awake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nijisanji
Template:Nijisanji has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)