User talk:Daisai Gaming

March 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Forum for Democracy (Netherlands), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''Please do not remove sourced information based on your personal opinion, unless you are able to provide reliable sources that claim otherwise. '' MrClog (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

So i have to give a source to proof that they are not a populist party yet you do not need to give a source that proofs they are ? The sources that you placed in the claim that FvD suppose to be a populist party only call them a populist party, they do not give any further information as to why they consider them a populist party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisai Gaming (talk • contribs)
 * The fact that these mainstream reliable sources say they are populist is indeed enough for me to list the party as populist. --MrClog (talk) 20:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ronan Farrow, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoan talk 03:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ronan Farrow; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  KyleJoan talk 03:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Consider this a final warning
I've had to delete your recent edits because they were gross violations of the biographies of living person's policy, and several of the edit summaries got into some really beyond-the-pale stuff. Consider this your final warning. If you do it again, I or any other administrator will not hesitate to block this account. -- Jayron 32 15:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)