User talk:Daisy Yoo

January 2019
Hello, I'm Heolkpop. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Heolkpop (talk) 04:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at RCA Records, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  05:23, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of current Hollywood Records artists. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Rob van  vee  06:29, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Daisy Yoo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Momoland have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:12, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Republic Records. 'Please note that I have warned you several times about adding unsourced info to articles. You have yet to source your edits and you have yet to respond to my requests on your talk page. If you continue with this disruptive behavior, I'll have no choice but to take this to ANI. Please source your edits and discuss other editors concerns on your talk page henceforth.  Rob van  vee ' 16:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

A final plea
This will be my final attempt to request you to source your edits. I have been extremely patient in the face of your constant disruption and repeated refusal to engage regarding this issue. Unless you are unable to properly communicate, there is no valid reason for you disregard these requests and it's ANI from here.  Rob van  vee  12:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at AN/I
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Unsourced and/or incorrect info. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 13:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 18:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC)