User talk:Daithidebarra

Copy-and-pasting from sources
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. --McGeddon (talk) 15:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem, it'll be fine once it's been copyedited and improved to the point where it no longer closely resembles the original text. I was just concerned that quite a few of the sentences seemed to have been lifted directly from the document you mention (which I found online here, with the enigmatic word "copyright" at the top), and wanted to make sure that we weren't repeating too much content verbatim. --McGeddon (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Ah, NOW I understand. The hard copy note I was working form is clearly the source from which the London Assembly were also working. I can confirm that the note I was using is not copyright and was actually supplied to me by the author who knew of my interest in the area, and knew that I inteneded to use it to improve the wikipedia entry. He is one of the "officers" of TravelWatch mentioned in the London Assembly report (but not by name) as having assisted. I take your point about the need to paraphrase more than I did.

Your submission at Articles for creation


I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crouch Hill Park. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's an example of how to add references: Chzz is 98 years old.&lt;ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. &lt;/ref>

He likes tea.&lt;ref> Smith, John. " Interview with Chzz", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  02:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Sarah Teather, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GLA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Sourcing and Ashmount article
It would be good if you can add some 3rd party references to this article. There is an artiicle at WP:REFB which can be useful on this. AllyD (talk) 22:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Crouch End Hill
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Crouch End Hill, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: "Crouch End Hill. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 22:29, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ashmount (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Nursery


 * Low-carbon economy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Combined Heat and Power


 * Metropolitan Open Land (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Green Chain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashmount Primary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Governing Body. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Local Schools Network
Hello Daithidebarra,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Local Schools Network for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —Swpbtalk 16:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Local Schools Network, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Free Schools and Plugin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=697771783 your edit] to Trinity College, Dublin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * dublin CATHOLICS AND TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN] House of Commons Debate, 8 May 1834 vol 23 cc761-7 From 1956 to 1970, the Catholic Church in Ireland forbade its adherents  from attending
 * ] met in the College in an attempt to address the political aftermath of the Easter rising. Subsequently, following the failure of the Convention to reach "substantial agreement"  the [[Irish

A barnstar for you!

 * Seconded. Incidentally – in your dispute with Wikijan2016, I suggest you forget about the "threatening tone". Bias, removal of reliably sourced information, and edit warring without trying to discuss on the talk page would all appear higher on my list of charges against him. Maproom (talk) 20:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toby Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservative Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

IP editor 82.7.125.216 / 81.104.12.193 edit warring
I saw your edit at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive947. I'm afraid few if any will notice an edit in an archive. If you want to reopen it, then start a new discussion at Administrators' noticeboard, and just reference the old one. Though I don't see any odd activity on either those two pages since February - and no edits by those IPs either - so it's unlikely that anyone would take any action. Blocking policy says that blocks should be preventative not punitive, and should not be used when "there is no current conduct issue of concern". If the edits resume, the most likely action would be semi-page protection to stop IPs from editing. The best way to do that is to make a request for each page at Requests for page protection. Nfitz (talk) 22:25, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Sark Company Registry
Hi, I put the reference to BBC www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-guernsey-40188193 In fact, the issue is of extreme importance for the Sark economy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.153.136.1 (talk) 22:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC) If you disagree, you are welcome to add other facts, but it is impolite to ignore the issue in general. Sark is an offshore financial centre, and the issue of companies is essential to understanding its money-making mechanism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.153.136.1 (talk) 22:33, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for posting to my talk page. As you are an IP editor and so may well not have a stable talk page address, I am replying to you here.

1. I would urge you, if you wish to get into debates on Wikipedia (and, indeed, the more the merrier) to register with a username as that will give you a talk page that can be used reliably. Apart from anything else currently, so far as I know, there is no way that I can be sure that you have been notified of this reply, and you might miss it.

2. With respect, your comments would have been best placed on the talk page of the article where more people would see it. Obviously if the two of us were to continue to disagree about the content of the article it would be important for other editors to be aware of that - we may have to build consensus. Of course it can be a good idea to post a note to the editor in question's talk page (ie in this case, mine) mentioning that a discussion has been started on the articles talk page. This is because when a post is made to my talk page I get an email notification - all the more reason for you to register and get your own talk page, I would have thought. I shall take the liberty of cutting and pasting this discussion to the talk page of the article, so that we can, if need be continue the discussion there.

3. Yes, I see you have reverted my edit in its entirety. I see you have therefore reinstated the use of the Sark Newsletter as a source, when it is clearly unreliable. I am minded to re edit so as to exclude the reference to the Sark Newsletter, and that part of the article that relies on this source. However I shall wait and see if there are comments from other editors.

4. I meant no discourtesy. Having been on wikipedia for a bit I am used to seeing edits, including mine, being, in their turn, edited robustly.

5. I look forward to continuing this discussion on the article talk page. I note your remark about the off shore financial industry of Sark and can see how further referenced information on that could be useful to the article. But, as on every thing else I would not put your trust in the Sark Newsletter......Daithidebarra (talk) 10:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)