User talk:Dalandau

Flag of Mandatory Palestine
Unfortunately, File:Flag of Palestine (1924).svg had no official status under the British mandate, and we really need to know what it was, and how it was used other than being published in a French dictionary, for it to be included in the article. Your footnotes were not to reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. AnonMoos (talk) 22:24, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Similar concerns at Palestinian flag 132.74.213.39 (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately for you, your edits on "Flag of Mandatory Palestine" are bordering on vandalism
Even if the flag eventually ends up being included on the article in some form, your pointless political tirade will still be completely inappropriate for the article, and the sources you've provided so far are not so impressive. We need more valid legitimate evidence provided by you on page Talk:Flag of Mandatory Palestine and a lot less edit warring. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AnonMoos (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Flag of Mandatory Palestine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Palestine Flag
Hi Dalandau,

I'm really making an effort to understand your argument here but I need more information. You keep saying that the red ensign was illegal under the Articles of the Mandate. Can you clarify what part of the Articles specifically you're talking about? Like can you give me a quote or a section number or something? I have read that page over and I can't find anything in there related to flags or national symbols or anything like that. What part are you talking about? And if you can't give me that, can you at least give me a reliable secondary source that supports your point of view? Tibetan Pop Rocks (talk) 02:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm looking at all the text you posted into the page and the word flag doesn't appear once. I can't for the life of me follow your reasoning here. How specifically is all that stuff related to the red ensign? Can you please make an effort to explain your actions on a talk page? Somewhere? Anywhere? If you don't start talking to other editors this is all just going to be deleted. Tibetan Pop Rocks (talk) 02:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tibetan Pop Rocks,

Britain had no right to do many things they did, the mandate as you read it you see is for the establishment of the Jewish homeland, the Flag that was in use was the blue white yellow star flag. The British though used another one. They had no right to go against and as you can see from the French Larousse wich is an Encyclopedia the British flag was not recognized.

Thank you

Dalandau (talk) 02:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

For more info if you which to understand the legality, here is a video.

The Legal Case for Israel Video by Professor Eugene Kontorovich

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub2x5UvjUs4

Another great International Lawyer who investigated this subject for over 20 years is Dr. Jaques Gautier who concludes that not only is Israel in accordance with International law but that the International community is in direct violation of it’s own Agreements and Charters they have themselves formulated

Another great Attorney who came to the same conclusion is Howard Grief who wrote the book “The Legal Foundation and Borders of Israel under International Law”

The Conclusion is all the same: the Jewish people have been betrayed many times over by the Nations of the world who do not abide by their own agreements that they have themselves formulated while continuing to do so and them being the reason behind many baseless wars where so many innocent live were lostDalandau (talk) 03:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

You can also read this 1947 testimony that speaks about many things that happened in Palestine mandated to the British

http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/364A6AC0DC52ADA785256E8B00716662

Thank you Dalandau (talk) 03:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.