User talk:Dalderdj

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 10:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Isidor Sârbu (disambiguation)


The article Isidor Sârbu (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Disambiguation page with only one item.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Bessarabian politician articles
Hello! Nice to meet you. I'm just confirming that the stamp picture you put on the Bessarabian politician articles you created contain the person in question? I so, I'd like to relocate the picture to the infobox (you can also do this yourself) as I think it makes more sense for it to go there, unless you disagree. Regards, Airplaneman  talk 01:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I will go ahead with it, as it seems the case. Regards, Airplaneman  talk 05:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyrights
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. 152.16.59.102 (talk) 07:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Copy & paste moves
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen.

In this specific case, because the move is contentious, you will need to follow the instructions at the requested moves page for opening discussion on the proposed move. —C.Fred (talk) 01:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dumitru Remenco
A tag has been placed on Dumitru Remenco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676  You gotta problem with that? 01:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Viaţa Basarabiei
A tag has been placed on Viaţa Basarabiei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676  You gotta problem with that? 01:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Viaţa Basarabiei
Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Page titles
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Moldova–Romania border crossings a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Moldova–Romania border. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pavel Parasca
A tag has been placed on Pavel Parasca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 19:43, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

I self-reverted this nomination. You don't need to be concerned about it. —  T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 19:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Adding non-notables
Hi. You recently added a large number of articles on people who do not appear to be notable. (The example above regarding Pavel Parasca is one.) Could you provide support from WP:BIO about why you feel this group of people is notable? Thanks, Piano non troppo (talk) 21:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest. They are public people, are regarded as important figures, are officeholders, academics, and authors, received a notable award or honor. (Dalderdj (talk) 21:38, 21 May 2010 (UTC))

Soroca Fort
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Soroca Fort, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://en.tixik.com/rovets-1285489.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Ion Ţurcanu
Hi Dalderdj. Thank you for creatiing  the article about  Ion Ţurcanu. In order to  prevent  possible deletion o f this article, please provide relable references in  English  language. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk) 14:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vladimir Beşleagă


The article Vladimir Beşleagă has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  Mr. R00t   Talk  17:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Second request for English language
Hi Dalderdj. Thank you for creating  the article about  Vasile Odobescu. In order to  prevent  possible deletion of this article, please provide relable references in  English  language. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk) 01:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

O rugaminte
In primul rand vreau sa va zic ca nu este obligatoriu ca referintele sa fie in limba engleza, doar sa provina din surse de incredere (WP:RS).

Acum: va rog frumos, ş si ţ, nu ș si ț! Da, stiu, a doua varianta e corecta, dar aici pe en.wp o folosim pe prima, si pana cand o-sa se hotarasca sa se schimbe de tot (ceea ce implica zeci de mii de modificari), vom ramane cu ş si ţ. Multumesc pentru intelegere si spor la treaba. - Biruitorul Talk 16:33, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ştefan Pirogan
A tag has been placed on Ştefan Pirogan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mark nutley (talk) 22:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Categories
Hey there. When adding categories, make sure they don't overlap. When they do, it's probably better to leave just a subcat. --Illythr (talk) 16:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tatarka common graves
A tag has been placed on Tatarka common graves, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Capitala
A tag has been placed on Capitala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kedster (talk / contribs) 05:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrei Strâmbeanu


The article Andrei Strâmbeanu has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article is too short.Article does not contain any reference.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Suri 100 (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Adrian Bălănescu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Bălănescu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adrian Bălănescu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Adrian Bălănescu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Bălănescu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adrian Bălănescu(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IDIS Viitorul
Hello, Dalderdj, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, IDIS Viitorul, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Oo7565 (talk) 01:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Romania
--Codrin.B (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valeriu Matei


The article Valeriu Matei has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 20:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Elections in Moldova since 1917
Template:Elections in Moldova since 1917 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Moldovan parliamentary seats, April 2009
Template:Moldovan parliamentary seats, April 2009 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Moldovan parliamentary seats, July 2009
Template:Moldovan parliamentary seats, July 2009 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your article Nicolae Osmochescu
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Nicolae Osmochescu to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Union of Journalists of Moldova members has been nominated for merging
Category:Union of Journalists of Moldova members has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Veaceslav Stăvilă for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veaceslav Stăvilă is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Veaceslav Stăvilă until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Consulate-General of Moldova, Iași


The article Consulate-General of Moldova, Iași has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Embassies are not inherently notable, consulates even less so. Fails WP:ORG for lack of coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Embassy of Moldova, Athens


The article Embassy of Moldova, Athens has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article just has 2 primary sources to confirm it exists. Fails WP:ORG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)