User talk:Dalen

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Jaxl 03:06, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Electronic Body Music
Read my edit summarries. I've never reverted any of your edits so I don't understand what your issue is?--Dr who1975 (talk) 14:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * BTW... I do think Assemblage 23 is an EBM band (I wouldn't love them if they weren't) but you'll notice I'm not messing with that page at the moment (because it's all unsourced). My reverts to the EBM page itself have nothing to do with my personal opinion and everything to do with maintaining a banned sockpuppeteer from editing. For instance, if you were to make the same changes that user:Breathtaker made, I would only become involved if there were a dispute regarding cited information. If you had read some of my earliest edit summaries with regard to this you would have laready figured this out. Thanks for inserting yourself anyway.--Dr who1975 (talk) 14:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

EBM Sample
Thank you for your polite response about my deletion of the the EBM samples. I have the following problems with the samples as they were on the page: I don't think that any of these issues cannot be overcome reasonably easily by a dedicated and knowledgeable editor or group. However, I would not be comfortable with them being added back without addressing the issues. Thank you for not rushing to replace them and instead initiating a conversation. If you have any questions about my concerns, I would be happy to answer them. If I were more knowledgeable about EBM, I would volunteer to help more. ~ Bigr  Tex  02:45, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) They were in a 'gallery' section.  There was no explanation of the samples given (What makes sample X an example of EBM?  Why did you choose to include sample X here?  etc.)  Although more about fair use image galleries, User:Betacommand/Fair use overuse explanation goes into more detail about the history behind my decision to remove the samples.  I think this is a case where some number of samples would be reasonable if there was appropriate commentary about them.
 * 2) They do not meet the WP:Music samples guideline, which requires them to be shorter than 30 seconds and less than 10% of the length of the track.  The two that I reviewed ([[Media:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg]] and [[Media:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg]]) are each more than double that length.  If I had not removed them from the page, I would have nominated them for deletion, as I have recently with other music samples.
 * 3) The rationales for those two samples are for their use on Gothic Rock, not EBM.  If the rationale does not match the placement, they should be removed.  This too could easily be fixed by someone who knew which genre the songs exemplify.

EBM
Hey there... wouldn't it be a good compromise to have a section for early EBM bands and later EBM bands... or perhaps breaking it up by decase. I've seen lots of sources that talk about how the genre changed in the late 90s so that couls also be mentioned. Also, I'm concerned that bands that are not notable enough to have theiur own wikipedia page are included. It seems to me that if a band is not notable enough to have a wikipage then it should not be mentioned on the EBM page. However, please bear in mind that I am more focused on resolving our inclusion dispute.--Dr who1975 (talk) 00:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Futurepop
I have reverted your edit to Futurepop and restored the content to Electronic body music. The content was merged there after a consensus at Articles for deletion/Futurepop, and I see no discussion or consensus on either article's talk page for splitting the content off again. The "dispute" you refer to seems to me to be coming from the IP editor 94.134.xx, who waged a similar edit war at the Futurepop redirect. As a result of his edit-warring the redirect was edit-protected per my request; I suggest the same for the EBM article to prevent his disruption. I will make the request. --IllaZilla (talk) 14:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure, however I do think splitting it off would be a good way to resolve the conflict though as Futurepop really is a separate genre (that might be influenced by EBM). --Dalen (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Consensus at the AfD was that it is not a separate genre, and that there were insufficient sources to support a stand-alone article about it. The "conflict" is coming entirely from 1 anonymous edit-warrer, who has been reverted numerous times by several different editors in respect of the AfD consensus. Appeasing the edit-warrer by recreating the merged Futurepop article is not the appropriate solution; cutting off the anon's ability to edit-war is. Electronic body music has been semi-protected for 1 month; I expect I'll have to request the same for Futurepop shortly if the anon resumes edit-warring there too. If the problems persist after protection expires, I'll request they be protected for even longer (6 months to a year). --IllaZilla (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FMI/OS


The article FMI/OS has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * FMIOS does not really exist and seemingly never got to the point of releasing even a single file. There is only a page at launchpad with zero files to download. This article has been around for 10 years. The domain www.fmios.org is abandoned, the last snapshot I found in the web archive is from 2011 and likewise offers zero files for download. I found an archived page of a bug tracker from 2011 which looks like the project was active only from 2006 to 2007,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Johannes Rohr (talk) 06:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Fishbrain logo.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fishbrain logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Fishbrain logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)