User talk:Dalewood1959

February 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Box Hill School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. ''Stop creating multiple accounts (Dalewood1952) an reverting edits. Thanks.'' →Enock 4 seth  (talk) 21:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Section on 'controversy' removed on the basis that it is a news article rather than encyclopedia material and also of a personal nature, not related to the school.Dalewood1959 (talk) 21:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, you should have added an edit summary or begin a discussion on the articles talk page before removing since there are refs. proving that, you just can't blank without explanation. I suggest you start a discussion on the talk page on it. Thanks. →Enock 4 seth  (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the advice. Will do.Dalewood1959 (talk) 22:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, can I remove, with explanation and then post a discussion or vice versa? Dalewood1959 (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, start the discussion first. Also do well to state your reasons in the edit summary when removing or adding contents, It helps Rollbackers and Patrollers to know what editors are up to.  →Enock 4 seth  (talk) 22:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)