User talk:Dallae

June 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kelp tea. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You are engaged in edit warring, WP:3RR. Please work through a better reference and discuss on the Talk page. '' Zefr (talk) 04:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You removed referenced sentences with a reliable tertiary source, blanked your talk page, and removed my comment from Talk:Kelp tea page. Please stop doing them. --Dallae (talk) 04:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Content should be discussed on the article talk page. Zefr deletes everything from their user page. Don't personalize things.  Do pay attention to the policies and guidelines that govern what we do here. Jytdog (talk) 04:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Please also know that every editor has the "right" to remove a comment from their own talk page. See WP:OWNTALK.  You are brand new here and don't know what you are doing, and you are being way too aggressive.  Jytdog (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Kelp tea shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 04:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Actually, you went way too far already.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 05:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Kelp tea. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)