User talk:Dallas Rose/sandbox

Isabella/Allie Peer Review
First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

-This is a good start/overview of an initial source. Because the official article isn't started yet, there aren't phrases at this time that capture the subject. However, I am interested to learn more about the lack of complete gender representation in history and today.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

-Now that an overview on a proper source has been established, the History and Theory sections should be expanded upon. She has a good start to this in her sandbox, but can continue to elaborate on these topics. These sections are currently blank in the original article, so any material addition would definitely be improving this page.

What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

-The original page is not complete and needs some work to get there. Adding to the incomplete sections as well as double checking correct structure will improve the article.

Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

-In her sandbox, she did a great job of starting to form the structure which I did not know how to do before.

Working on Thesis and History Topics
Hello, I am editing and adding to the thesis and history sections of the Gender Archeology page. I am new to editing in Wikipedia, so this is my first addition. Dallas Rose (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)