User talk:Dalmatinska

May 2023
Hello, I'm Riverbend21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Đorđe Nemanjić have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Riverbend21 (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced or remove sourced content, as you did at Valtazar Bogisic, and several other pages, you may be blocked from editing. Also using multiple ip is considered sock puppetry Theonewithreason Theonewithreason (talk) 17:45 26 June 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bleiburg genocide
Hello, Dalmatinska

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Edward-Woodrow, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Bleiburg genocide, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
--Joy (talk) 17:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bleiburg genocide


The article Bleiburg genocide has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Recreation- Blatant POV pushing, content fork of Bleiburg repatriations, based on one opinion piece, completely unencyclopedic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bleiburg genocide. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Bleiburg genocide. ''I've applied WP:CSD twice now on this. The onus is on you to explain what you're trying to do and why it can't be done at Talk:Bleiburg repatriations. --'' Joy (talk) 07:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yugoslav Partisans genocide


The article Yugoslav Partisans genocide has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is almost entirely unsourced and essentially duplicates the Bleiburg repatriations article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 14:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Bleiburg genocide/Yugoslav Partisans genocide
You seem to be on some kind of crusade here. What do hope to accomplish? Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 14:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yugoslav Partisans genocide


Yugoslav Partisans genocide, which has the same content as the twice-deleted Bleiburg genocide, has been tagged for speedy deletion as duplicating and not expanding on, the content of Bleiburg repatriations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 15:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. --Joy (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)