User talk:Dalmationsforlife

Speedy deletion of Coco solid
A tag has been placed on Coco solid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Habanero-tan (talk) 09:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Coco solid reply left on Anthony's talk page
Hi Anthony

Sorry to see you have deleted the COCO SOLID page quickly. It says that you don't think the listing is of high enough importance. Coco Solid is a top New Zealand musician who has been performing for many years. She has won a top musical award on New Zealand college radio. She has also recently received a significant song writing grant from the country's composer organisation APRA. Here are the references to what I have just explained.

http://www.amplifier.co.nz/news/33258/bnet-awards-winners.html - the bnet awards

http://www.apra.co.nz/html/news_item.php?id=6564&newsCat=s - the recent song writing award

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10569342 - an article from New Zealand's biggest cities website refering to an up coming artist as sounding like Coco Solid.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=10552915&pnum=0 - another New Zealand artist saying that Coco Solid is someone they look up to.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10533097 - an article about Coco Solid pressing a record

Please write back to explain what you think needs to be explained to restore the listing

(Dalmationsforlife (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC))Dalmationsforlife


 * Hi there! Coco_solid has been put up for a deletion vote instead of speed-deleted.  You can witness and take part in the proceedings here: Articles_for_deletion/Coco_solid.  We refer to this process as "AfD."  For what it's worth, I think that the links you included ought to prove notability and the article should be kept. -moritheil Talk 22:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Coco solid has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/bordermusic/, http://www.myspace.com/bordermusic/ (redirect from http://www.myspace.com/bordermusic/)). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 21:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hook Ups concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hook Ups, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hook Ups


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hook Ups requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10881026. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; rybec   08:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)