User talk:DaltonCastle

Khodorkovsy and reverts
Please do not make mass reverts of limited and justified changes and mark them as "minor", especially without even explaining why you are doing it as you did the first time, as if you were simply repairing IP vandalism. It's rude and unconstructive. I have restored my changes, some of which were grammatical improvements, but restored some of the info you insist must be there, but which WP:OPENPARA probably would not. I have also opened a talk page section.  N-HH   talk / edits  08:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

U.N. me
Could you take a look at this article? I'd appreciate your input. Activist (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure thing! I'll take a look now! DaltonCastle (talk) 20:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I had also thanked Ken through the button for his helpful change.. Glad we could work it out. Activist (talk) 08:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Good Faith Edit at Oath Keepers
Hiya,

just wanted to drop you a note regarding your reversion. A couple things you might not have known:


 * 1 - the page is under heavy sockpuppet attack that resumes within days of its semiprotection expiring, repeatedly. See SPI regarding the latest sleeper account for more details.


 * 2 - the wording you removed is (a) sourced, VERY specifically to cite the word radical,and (b) was hashed out on the talk page some time ago.

If you think it should be removed, you're welcome to create a new section on the talk page to re-hash it, but you should be aware that wording is sourced to multiple Verifiable and Reliable Sources. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 05:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * ah ha! I was not aware of such sock puppetry. I will review the history of the article and any relevant sources about the group. DaltonCastle (talk) 19:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. I figured based on your editing history that you were patrolling recent changes in good faith, but just didn't quite look closely enough at the page history. I made a point to leave a note that you were NOT considered part of the SPI case on the SPI page as well, just to make sure that nothing spills over on you. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 03:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! No worries, I can even keep an eye out for any sock-puppetry too. DaltonCastle (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Weingarten & standardized testing
I've laid out my issues with the section as currently published here, FWIW. —GGreeneVa (talk) 19:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I think we are all good here now, but if you have any more concerns let me know. DaltonCastle (talk) 17:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your reverts of my edits
You've reverted my addition of material to the Koch page, despite it being sourced, with the simple dismissal of "not an improvement." That's your opinion, and I feel it was an improvement, otherwise I wouldn't have made the edit. On the Alternative Right page, you deleted a sourced section with your opinion again, saying "It's just the opinion of some guy" - again, despite the face that it was sourced, and part of the "Criticism" section, where it certainly belongs. I'll be putting those edits back into place. You'll need a better reason to revert them again. Thanks. Rockypedia (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I have provided reasons. If you don't understand them I'd be happy to lay them out in more detail. DaltonCastle (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Your reasons amount to "That's my opinion and that's that". If you have concrete reasons, you should state them. Rockypedia (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * That is fundamentally not accurate. DaltonCastle (talk) 20:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Time to stop
You both have had 3RR warnings before. Doug Weller talk 18:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016
Gain consensus for your suggested changes first, then edit. WP:BRD, WP:EW, etc. etc.   Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:29, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Uh, no. That's the entire point of WP:BOLD. DaltonCastle (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * When you are reverted - as you have been, twice by different editors, you need to discuss. You didn't - you are starting to edit war.   Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * By two editors heavily involved on that page. But I am guilty of WP:OWN. Got it. DaltonCastle (talk) 07:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Referendum Statistics
Hi, I am getting the referendum results from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/eu_referendum/results - the BBC's live updates website. Prtyinthusa (talk) 23:50, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! DaltonCastle (talk) 23:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Talk: Donald Trump Presidential Campaign 2016
Greetings, would you please consider weighing in on the first bullet in the Talk discussion on your edits to indicate whether you still believe that content should be removed?CFredkin (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I will see what I can do, but the tendentious editing over there is becoming exhausting. DaltonCastle (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Times Film Corporation v. City of Chicago
Hello! Your submission of Times Film Corporation v. City of Chicago at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 02:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Why did you undo my edits?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg&oldid=731889842

Why did you undo my edits? They were not executed for treason. They were executed for Espionage. That is why I removed it from that category. Did you think it was vandalism?2604:6000:1506:408E:BD49:E978:461E:7A33 (talk) 08:47, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That doesn't apply in all circumstances. Looking further into it, though, fine, I will concede to that point. They were not technically executed for treason, by the strictest definition of "treason". DaltonCastle (talk) 23:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Times Film Corporation v. City of Chicago
— Maile (talk) 01:11, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

 * Why did you post this here for me and not for any of the other editors active on the page, who are adding POV content? DaltonCastle (talk) 02:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I think most people are already aware of the discretionary sanctions, and most do discuss controversial changes on the talkpage before, or as, they make them. Specifically, I thought you ought to be alerted because you removed part of a section that was subject to lively discussion on talk, without taking part in that discussion (only when another user opened a section to discuss your change did you take part). And because your edit summary for the removal was kind of aggressive and bad-faith-assuming. But as the alert says, it does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date. I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the DS. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC).

DYK for Alberto Youssef
Gatoclass (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Cylance Inc.
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in Bolivia
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in Tajikistan
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

EW
You are edit warring on Political positions of Donald Trump. Please stop doing this or you may end up being blocked from editing. The first time you were reverted was the opportunity to make your case for removing well-referenced material from the article. You also made similar edits on other Donald Trump articles, for example ignoring a consensus from an RfC. - MrX 18:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Different edits - not edit warring.
 * 1st Revert 2nd Revert 3rd Revert. WP:EW policy states: "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—''whether involving the same or different material'—within a 24-hour period". I strongly suggest that you stop.- MrX 18:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Only 2 of those are reverts. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * More than happy to discuss on article talk page about the weight given to criticisms. No way the inclusion of that much criticism is justified and encyclopedic. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

RMS Etruria
Hi, how do you know Thos W Ward did not do the scrapping if you do not know who did the job? Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I actually did not oppose your edit at all. It was the previous edit that was the problem. We can reinsert your edit no problem. DaltonCastle (talk) 06:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I have just complete 0.5 hours search to prove you quite wrong. I will now adjust the article accordingly. Please consider someone else may have better sources than you. Eddaido (talk) 07:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I think you misunderstood me. DaltonCastle (talk) 07:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Hale v. Henkel
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Producing some great articles! Can I interest you in contributing to the new WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge? ♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the kind words and for thinking of me. I will look into it! DaltonCastle (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Corruption in Angola
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in Angola at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 07:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
I made an error in the hook; could you please check out the ALT1 I added to the discussion? North America1000 14:56, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob 13 Talk 15:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Corruption in Angola
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in Angola at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Answering on template page. DaltonCastle (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Corruption in Italy
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in Italy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gulumeemee (talk) 06:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Answering on template page. DaltonCastle (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in Italy
Harrias talk 21:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in Georgia at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in Yemen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 09:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * DaltonCastle, it's been over three weeks since this notice was posted, yet you have not responded despite considerable activity elsewhere on Wikipedia. If you wish to continue pursuing this nomination, we'll need to hear from you very soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Corruption in Ecuador
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in Ecuador at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * DaltonCastle, it's been over two and a half weeks since this notice was posted, yet you have not responded despite considerable activity elsewhere on Wikipedia. If you wish to continue pursuing this nomination, we'll need to hear from you very soon; the article cannot be promoted at DYK while it has a POV template. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Ami Horowitz discussion
Hey Dalton. I see you're the creator of Ami Horowitz. I just started a discussion on Talk:Ami_Horowitz on some possible cleanup issues (and even possible, but hopefully not needed, deletion). Just thought you might want to add your 2c. Cheers. Sleety Dribble (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I am answering on the article talk page. DaltonCastle (talk) 05:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * On the Ron Chernow page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=765164126 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F765164126%7CRon Chernow%5D%5D Ask for help])
 * On the Ataf Khawaja page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=765164095 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F765164095%7CAtaf Khawaja%5D%5D Ask for help])
 * Apologies for that. Had no idea the faulty nature of my edits. I'll be better about this in the future. DaltonCastle (talk) 19:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Corruption in Eritrea


The article Corruption in Eritrea has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Primarily a statement of opinion, with no references to conclusions about incidence of corruption.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

CDMP Certified Data Management Professional
Hi Dalton .. I see you have an interest in this page. I am a member of DAMA who administers the CDMP. I have renewed my id with Wikipedia (last edit was 2005!) for purposes of improving the CDMP page. Currently I am signed in under the DAMA id ... you can reach me directly as BSCHMIDT. Damainternational (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Inquiry and question about a new article
Hi Dalton! I am very interested in your contributions in Wikipedia and I want to contribute with an article that I believe you'll find interesting but since I'm new here I don't know how to do it. I neither know if it can be written in Wikipedia or if I will have problems with it. This is very complex to tell you here. Is there any way to contact you by email or chat in order to give you further details about the article? I am sure you can give me a hand with it. I can give you an email so we can get in touch. Many thanks!!!!!--AlexanderHamilton1776 (talk) 18:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, sorry for the late reply. I haven't had as much time to stay active on here as usual. I'm not sure how much time I can dedicate really to the article you mention. What is it? I think your best bet is probably Articles for Creation. DaltonCastle (talk) 04:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks for your reply! The matter is very complex and sensitive to being explained here (I'm not even sure if I would be able to publish it in Wikipedia) and it doesn't matter if you don't have much time now. Maybe you can give me tips to write it but is important to give you further details. Is there any way to contact you outside here, I mean, by mail or chat? It's OK for me if I give you an email here and you write me back. I really thank you for your concern and help!--AlexanderHamilton1776 (talk) 00:44, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ice World (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ice World (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ice World (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 23:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Burnley by-election, 1893
Back in 2015 you added Burnley by-election, 1893 to a category seeking expert attention. It's not clear to me what the problem was. Maybe it has been fixed since then? Derek Andrews (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of FLVTO for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FLVTO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FLVTO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brandmeistertalk  22:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Sophal Ear for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophal Ear is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sophal Ear& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  06:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Pravit Rojanaphruk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pravit Rojanaphruk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pravit Rojanaphruk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  06:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of AceVPN for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AceVPN is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AceVPN until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Arnold Demain biographical content
Please check the Arnold Demain page to judge if recent cuts to the material you contributed are justified and constructive. While I'm no authority on such matters, I did not find the reason given for these extensive cuts to be particularly compelling.Kappock (talk) 19:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Kingdom of Tengiz
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom of Tengiz. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. SpinningSpark 20:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Domonique Bertolucci for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Domonique Bertolucci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Domonique Bertolucci until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ploni (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph D'Aleo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph D'Aleo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Joseph D'Aleo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi there,

My name is Maddy, and I work for Headland Consultancy. We are a PR firm that represents a number of clients, including Clara Pensions. Clara Pensions is a relatively new UK pensions provider which is part of a new breed of pension “superfunds”. These superfunds have been created to bridge the gap for defined benefit pension schemes who are looking to transfer their pension members to an insurer, but cannot yet afford to do so.

Clara is the first (and so far only) superfund to be approved by the Pensions Regulator. It expects to start transactions and welcome its first pension scheme members later in 2023.

I’m getting in touch with you today because I can see that you’ve written and contributed to a number of different pages about major UK financial services providers, including AJ Bell. Given your established presence as a Wikipedia editor in this sector, I was wondering if you would be interested in creating an article about Clara Pensions.

Given that it’s a fairly recent challenger in the British pensions market, it has yet to have a Wikipedia page. I hope you will consider making this contribution to Clara’s Wikipedia presence. Do let me know if you have any questions or require any further information on the above.

Thanks,

Maddyruthg19 (talk) 11:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Maddy

Administrators Noticeboard Discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is New user WP:PROXYING. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Looking for Feedback
Hi! As part of my university curriculum, I've contributed to the banking lobby wiki article which I believe you created. I'm contacting past editors seeking feedback on my contributions, so if you could take a look at it, I would appreciate it. I am new to Wikipedia, so I apologize for any mistakes in the article. No problem if you cannot take a look, thank you for your previous contributions to the article! Peanutbutterisbad (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ketakandriana Rafitoson
Hello, DaltonCastle,

Thank you for creating Ketakandriana Rafitoson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"The main body of this article is almost exclusively devoted to the personal and professional biography of its subject and only makes brief references to her notable and relevant public activities. More information must be presented about her visible public relevance."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Garagepunk66 (talk) 02:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ketakandriana Rafitoson
Hello, DaltonCastle,

Thank you for creating Ketakandriana Rafitoson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"The majority of this article focuses almost exclusively on the personal and professional biography of its subject and does not sufficiency and in enough detail explain her notable and relevant public activities. The article needs new and sufficiently-detailed section devoted to the situation that has made its subject a public figure."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Garagepunk66 (talk) 02:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Article about Ketakandriana Rafitoson
Thank you for creating the article about Ketakandriana Rafitoson. However, the article needs much more development. Right now it reads almost like a resumé--it is almost completely devoted to the personal and professional biography of its subject and does not adequately and in enough detail address Rafitoson's notable and relevant public activities. Someone needs to add a new and detailed section devoted to the situation that made her a notable public figure. It is important do do this, because, if not, the article will be vulnerable to deletion. Garagepunk66 (talk) 02:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Your edits to Ketakandriana Rafitoson and John Scott-Railton have been removed in whole or in part, as it appears you added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dalia Hatuqa


The page Dalia Hatuqa has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from http://www.daliahatuqa.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 21:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lyall Swim


A tag has been placed on Lyall Swim, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David Gerard (talk) 13:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Please don't copy material from elsewhere online
Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 20:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Oslo FF
Hey, saw you created an article for Mazuba Haanyama, I'm working on creating an update for this year's forum if you want to contribute here: User:Sj/OFF Heycurran (talk) 15:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, DaltonCastle, and thank you for creating so many biographies of women, particularly those active in the area of human rights. You might find it useful to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. If you are interested, you can sign up under "New registrations" on WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miranda Patrucic


The article Miranda Patrucic has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''There is no independent, significant coverage of this journalist in reliable sources. Furthermore, none of the below are fulfilled.

WP:NJOURNALIST:

This guideline applies to authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals. Such a person is notable if:

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; or The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; or The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series); or The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. बिनोद थारू (talk) 00:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)