User talk:DaltonCastle/Archive 4

New section, October
Conflict of interest?

Excuse me, but every reference I cited has links or videos or screen caps of court records. all but two of the sources I provided were written b the local newspaper by a reported who was in the courtroom. Did you even bother reading them, or was that too much effort?

By the way, your edits about how Pauling is awaiting trial is erroneous. He accepted A PLEA DEAL yesterday to AVOID trial. Instead he pleaded guilty to several charges EXACTLY as I described (and cited the source). He will be sentenced in November, So congratulations, you managed to take a truthful wikipedia edit and change it into a TOTALLY inaccurate one. Bravo.

Ari Bass, JD, aka Michael Whiteacre Journalist since 1985 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.167.32.169 (talk) 20:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Calm down dude. This is a major part of Wikipedia: Identifying reliable sources. Primary sources are almost always not suitable, except special circumstances. And since you are Michael Whiteacre, someone who is anti-anti-porn activists, you have a conflict of interest editing these pages. You should consider keeping your edits restricted to the article's talk page, then, while also remaining civil and polite. DaltonCastle (talk) 21:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Actually, COI rules *don't* absolutely prohibit activists of various kinds from editing pages, and if this were the case, there are *many* edits on a variety of topics that need to be reverted. Being active or close to the subject of an article where the topic is at all controversial means one must be extra-cautious about the nature of one's edits, and lowers the bar for removal of blatantly biased content from that editor.


 * In the case of Donny Pauling, his arrest and conviction on a number of sexual abuse charges is a matter of public record, covered by the Appeal-Democrat, the local paper in the area where the crime took place, something that absolutely meets Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sourcing for biographical information. MW's error was to source the edits to The Real Porn Wikileaks, which does not meet that criteria. However, those sources are themselves sourced (and sometimes directly reprint) Appeal-Democrat stories. The edits should be restored with the citations changed to the primary news source, and with the more neutral title "Arrest" used. I will be making these edits shortly, and unless you can claim the edits are not an accurate summary of the source content, you have no basis for further reversion.


 * BTW, this conversation belongs on Talk:Donny Pauling Iamcuriousblue (talk) 22:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

IMF
Hi DaltonCastle, Are you still interested in the IMF database? I noticed you filled in the form for the World Bank one but not the IMF one. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 08:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for contacting. I went ahead and filled it out. Looking forward to using this database! Thanks again! DaltonCastle (talk) 00:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in Equatorial Guinea
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in South Sudan
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in South Sudan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
 * Greetings! Thank you for reviewing the nomination. I have replied on the actual template but am making a note here too. I am not entirely sure what the issue is that needs to be addressed. Let me know at either place and I'll fix it promptly. DaltonCastle (talk) 04:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah! Nevermind, I just read up on DYK QPQ policies. If you are searching here let me know the appropriate place to go to review another DYK. DaltonCastle (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in South Sudan
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lance Hart


A tag has been placed on Lance Hart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/movies/a36249/fifty-shades-debate-portrayal-of-bdsm-lifetstyle/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Lance Hart
I saw your comment over at the talk page for Lance Hart. I was the deleting admin, and since the article has been deleted it would be better to communicate with me on the matter since the talk page of a deleted article is cannon fonder for speedy deletion.

On the matter of copyright, I looked at the two versions for comparison and the article here and the material at the alleged source were close enough to warrant deletion. This is always a judgement call, and if you would like the page back to make an attempt at rewording I'd be happy to oblige. Alternatively, if you believe I erred in this matter, you may voice your grievance at the Admin's Noticeboard. I will await your reply on your preferred course of action on this matter. TomStar81 (Talk) 17:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Greetings! And thanks for responding. I dont think going to the ANI is necessary at all since you were cordial enough to contact me. Is there a way I can look at the old page in a draft template? I have never been sure of how to look at the article code for a deleted page. Since the article was a stub I think I can fix whatever the issue was very quickly with some copy editing. Let me know where I can go. DaltonCastle (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Done and done. The restored version is at Draft:Lance Hart. The alleged copyright violation came from a ping at this website, so you've now got the page and the reference material to work with. Good luck. TomStar81 (Talk) 18:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will ping you when it is ready for review. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lance Hart


A tag has been placed on Lance Hart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I am not as opposed to a deletion on these grounds. Since, in the future, should he become more notable, there is a base for the article. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Marie Serneholt
If you want to, please take a look at this weeks TAFI selected article, Marie Serneholt. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Virginia Tech Project Invite
Go Hokies (talk) 22:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Take a look
I was wondering if you could take a look at my recent edits and give some advice if needed. You also might be interested in this incident as well which will soon be featured in more articles with more information being released.-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 18:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Im so sorry! I completely forgot to check this out. Was this in reference to your work on the 2002 Venezuelan Coup D'Etat Attempt article or Cilia Flores? Either way, your edits on both pages look great! The drug trafficking incident is shocking. I think it should be added to Corruption in Venezuela. You could also include information about Chavez' abuse of power in regards to forcing the military to aid FARC from the 2002 Coup D'Etat page. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you want me to, I can proceed with some of these edits myself if you do not anticipate the time to do. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I think some of the sections have to be rewritten since so many people are allegedly involved in the drug trade now.-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 04:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes that is a point I was gonna bring up. General updates are appropriate.DaltonCastle (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * If you can, make some edits with some new and existing information on this section. I can try to come help with the article a little bit later. Thanks for all of your help!-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 22:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I made a large update to the Corruption in Venezuela article. Take a look at it and let me know what you think!-- ZiaLater  ( talk  ) 21:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Human Rights Foundation page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=692373473 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F692373473%7CHuman Rights Foundation%5D%5D Ask for help])

Solntsa90
Hello, I'm Solntsa90. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Leopoldo López without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

You remove entire passages without any reason given with the common theme that they are critical of Leopoldo Lopez, most notably among others, the well-cited one regarding Lopez' active role in the 2002 coup against Hugo Chavez:

López played a leading role in the 2002 Venezuelan coup d'état attempt against President Hugo Chávez, where as mayor of Chacao, the wealthiest district in Caracas, he lead protests and conducted civil disorder to the level of which NPR states "culminated in an attempted coup against Chávez in 2002, and even personally detained the Minister of Interior and Justice Ramón Rodríguez Chacín during the events of the failed coup attempt.

As this is well-cited info, I'm not sure why it is being removed. Solntsa90 (talk) 03:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I will answer on article talk page. DaltonCastle (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Your recent editing history at Leopoldo López shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Stop removing cited information from the page, stop re-inserting political bias within the article, stop making edits without contributing to the talk page as to why you're making these edits. Solntsa90 (talk) 05:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Corruption in Sudan
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in Sudan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Further issues have been identified. Please stop by as soon as possible to address them. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in Afghanistan
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in Uzbekistan at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 22:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Will complete it today. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hi Dalton Castle Hope you are well! I have added some new info to the Profile for Maryam Faghihimani some days ago and shorten a few parts. I have noticed that you have decided to undo the changes. How would you like us to include the new info'? Please let me hear your suggestions. Many thanks! Nerd1956 Dec 28 2015 11:23 UTC +1:00 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerd1956 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Will answer on the article talk page. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Categories
Hi, just a note that taskforce/wikiproject categories shouldn't be added directly to article pages, but rather to the talk page, and they should be added using templates like WikiProject Film. Also, while there's nothing wrong with adding general categories so that more knowledgable editors can make them more specific, for your edification for film articles the main three that should be added are the year, the country, and the language. Happy editing. Opencooper (talk) 06:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * To add to this "footballers" categories should only be applied to articles about people, not competitions. Thanks, C679 09:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Once in a while I like to help out with uncategorized or unassessed articles. I like to add categories that seem applicable just to get it off the uncategorized list. If someone with more expertise in a subject knows more, by all means, they should fix it. Sometimes I don't know about subcategories in a given category. Overall I don't see how this is detrimental, as it largely categorizes previously uncategorized articles. However, I will admit that the Los Angeles Unified School District category was a mistake. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * And plenty of times its not that simple to find the correct subcategory (in this case Football clubs in Athens). Sometimes HotCat is slow to load, or generally difficult. Or the logical name of a category is non-existent. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That's the issue though, you're creating more work rather than less. It's much easier for someone familiar with categories to add them from scratch the first time rather than coming upon an article later and trying to figure out if all of them are correct. (Especially because there currently isn't a good way to watch new additions to categories) I suggest adding only the categories you are confident about and either keeping the uncategorized template or adding a Improve categories template so it can be tracked. I totally understand that many categories might not be logical or easy to understand/find. One thing I found that helps wonders in cases like these is looking at similar articles or referring to the relevant WikiProject's guidelines. You can avoid mistakes by individually inspecting each category and looking at their descriptions as well as the kinds of articles inside it. Many times you even have to climb up the categories to find the right type. I know it takes time but thats really the only way to get good at categorizing. I would also suggest disabling HotCat because it encourages you to just add whatever pops up. (Or instead of clicking the "+", hit "++" so that the changes don't get applied right away) Opencooper (talk) 22:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

A concern about your edits
On the article Los Angeles Unified School District, you added the category "education". However, two of the categories which were already on the article eventually led to the parent category "education".

You did the same at American Strategic Insurance, adding a parent, "Category:Insurance", a child, "Category:Insurance companies", and two more children, "Category:Auto insurance in the United States" and "Category:Insurance companies of the United States".

WP:SUBCAT states that "a page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category (supercategory) of that category".

On the article Apollon Halandriou F.C., you added the category "Athens", but a few seconds of following links would have taken you to the child "Category:Football clubs in Athens", which you didn't add.

I see that you have made 19,404 edits, so you are not a new editor. I'm sure there is an explanation for these edits. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Once in a while I like to help out with uncategorized or unassessed articles. I like to add categories that seem applicable just to get it off the uncategorized list. If someone with more expertise in a subject knows more, by all means, they should fix it. Sometimes I don't know about subcategories in a given category. Overall I don't see how this is detrimental, as it largely categorizes previously uncategorized articles. However, I will admit that the Los Angeles Unified School District category was a mistake. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * And plenty of times its not that simple to find the correct subcategory (in this case Football clubs in Athens). Sometimes HotCat is slow to load, or generally difficult. Or the logical name of a category is non-existent. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * DaltonCastle, I echo Magnolia677's concern. You added several inapt and parent categories at 2015 Kansai Collegiate American Football League Division 1 football standings and 2015–16 Furman Paladins women's basketball team.  If you plan to continue with this sort of editing, it would be best if you could take some more care.  Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Maryam Faghihimani
@DaltonCastle, thanks for the reply. The information that I added was very media such as CNN and JPost as well as her talk at Oslo Freedom Forum, The 3rd Hague Peace conference and Universal Tolerance Forum...They had important information such as he trip to Israel and Palestine and visiting number of officials etc. Also there were too much details about her (like activities) which comes from her Linkedin so I though those that are not relevant can be shorten and then we add some new and more relevant info about her. If you have a look at my edit you will see the info however when I got back to add all the references I saw that you decided to undo the edit. Please let me know if I can help to improve this page. Thanks and Happy New Year! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerd1956 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Please keep this discussion on the article talk page. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Maryam Faghihimani
@DaltonCastle, thanks for the reply. The information that I added was very media such as CNN and JPost as well as her talk at Oslo Freedom Forum, The 3rd Hague Peace conference and Universal Tolerance Forum...They had important information such as he trip to Israel and Palestine and visiting number of officials etc. Also there were too much details about her (like activities) which comes from her Linkedin so I though those that are not relevant can be shorten and then we add some new and more relevant info about her. If you have a look at my edit you will see the info however when I got back to add all the references I saw that you decided to undo the edit. Please let me know if I can help to improve this page. Thanks and Happy New Year! PS. Sorry forgot to sign hence re-posting it (I am still new for using the talk page) Nerd 1356(talk) 30th December 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerd1956 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Please keep this discussion on the article talk page. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in Sudan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 06:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Request to revisit the discussion per an ALT hook presented therein. North America1000 08:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in Sudan
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Corruption in Uzbekistan
Hello! Your submission of Corruption in Uzbekistan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 17:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * There has been a response to your request for further suggestions. Please stop by as soon as you can. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the update! I am currently in the process of fixing it. DaltonCastle (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in Uzbekistan
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Fold3
You should have gotten an email from me about this - could you please either fill out the linked form, or email me if you didn't get it? Nikkimaria (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for notifying me. DaltonCastle (talk) 03:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Phalat
Hello, DaltonCastle,

I believe I have addressed your concerns about the above nomination. Please continue the review, and thank you for your efforts.

Georgejdorner (talk) 16:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I have supplied additional commentary on your suggested alternate hooks. I hope that you find this useful. Please query me if you have any further concerns after reading the commentary.Georgejdorner (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I have agreed to a third opinion.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

DYK
Hi, I have got the Assassination of Ali copyedited (Template:Did you know nominations/Assassination of Ali). If problem still persists please let me know. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 08:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Political activities of the Koch brothers
Hi Dalton. I noticed that you were engaged in some low-level edit warring at Political activities of the Koch brothers a couple of months ago. I'm a little disturbed that you repeatedly deleted well-sourced content on legitimate NPV grounds. (There has certainly been an unfortunate amount of ideological battling going on over there.) The content added by other editors was definitely salvageable and extremely noteworthy. Instead of deleting the content you should have fixed it. Would you care to take a crack at restoring and fixing the content or would you prefer that I do so? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * What content are you referencing? DaltonCastle (talk) 17:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * This content about the Koch's competitive intelligence gathering activities, sourced to Politico, is what I was most intrigued by. The New Yorker called this a "blockbuster scoop" but there's no reference to it in our article. I also saw that you warred over other content supported by the Huffington Post. I do see that the subject matter is mentioned in our article but it's not clear that the HuffPo-sourced material is adequately represented. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah! Well, some editors had attempted to add very POV content. It appeared to me as an obvious COATRACK. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not doubting your motives and I agree that the content was non-neutral. But that doesn't mean you should have deleted it outright and ignored the talk page discussion on the subject. In any case, what to do now? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Corruption in Haiti
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

General Menéndez
Hi DaltonCastle: Ref. your page on General Menéndez. Facts are OK but it contains the wrong picture. That picture shows General Lonardi, not Menéndez. regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pibex (talk • contribs) 11:16, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Could you tell me exactly what page this is in reference to? DaltonCastle (talk) 06:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Lewandowski Alleged Assault
I reverted your recent removal of the well sourced section on the Breitbart assault though I apologize for not clarifying in the edit summary. I went ahead and clarified in the talk page. Feel free to continue the conversation there. &#124; MK17b &#124;  (talk)  04:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for contacting. We can keep the discussion on the article talk page now. I'll make sure to watch it. DaltonCastle (talk) 06:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Trump article
I do acknowledge your concerns, but I don't necessarily agree that a paragraph-by-paragraph breakdown won't go anywhere. I've found that dividing issues out (1A, 1B, 2, 3A, 3B) can actually help gain consensus faster (whether part of a formal RfC or moral informally). I think we have a duty to at least try. Neutralitytalk 01:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * If that's how you feel then I will proceed in any capacity. Thank you for responding. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Coverage of a tweet at Katrina Pierson
Regarding this, the inclusion of the full tweet—while a little lengthy—was an attempt to stave off editorial descriptions of it like this or this. Rebb ing  17:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)