User talk:Dam222

Mass unlink of 2020 North Indian Ocean cyclone season
Hello. I have mass reverted your delinking of 2020 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Could you explain why you did that, and what you meant by "disruptive" as you have said in the edit summaries? Thanks.  Java Hurricane  12:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Concern answered on my talk page.  Java Hurricane  12:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Whale
🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * For the unlinking. I did that once too. It took four months and 500 edits to undo it (all done by myself). 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me!  12:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I accidentally pressed the button unlike Dam222 🌋 (talk) 13:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

The draft:
Hey there! Thanks for your contributions on my draft. My concern is the 1 min sustained winds. What source did you pull that from? 🌀 ☾⊙ ☈⊙ ♫ꍏ  🌀 15:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Source Dam222 🌋 (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * But that's for 2020 storms. 🌀  ☾⊙ ☈⊙ ♫ꍏ  🌀  15:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Download all the data from 1982 to 2020. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, Thanks! Just wanted to make sure! 🌀 ☾⊙ ☈⊙ ♫ꍏ  🌀  15:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * 1 minute sustained wind source for you Dam222 🌋 (talk) 20:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * TYSM!  🌀  ☾⊙ ☈⊙ ♫ꍏ  🌀   22:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays!
Thank you Dam222 🌋 (talk) 17:27, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Tropical cyclone effects by region has been nominated for merging
Category:Tropical cyclone effects by region has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 23:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!




 Dam222 , Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours!  HurricaneEdgar    17:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)


 * – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!




 Dam222 , Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! ~ Destroyer 🌀🌀 19:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)


 * – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year Dam222 🌋 (talk) 19:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
You are welcome. Happy New Year to you.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC) 

Thank you very much Dam222 🌋 (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

A cheezburgr for you!


DachshundLover82 (talk) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.

Thank you for your contributions to tropical cyclone articles. I like cheezburgrs and I hope you will too! DachshundLover82 (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you DachshundLover82. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 16:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Ur welkomez lolDachshundLover82 (talk) 16:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Stop deleting my edits. If you took the time to research point you would agree with me. There is diversity in Scotland
Stop deleting my edits. If you took the time to research point you would agree with me. There is diversity in Scotland — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmcdonald19751975 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry you cannot put external links in paragraphs. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 08:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Cyclone Eloise
Hi, I would like to ask you about your latest edit. Is there any other resource than ATCF when JTWC doesn't do official advisories? where can I get the gust of it? It is still 90kt on the Wiki page so... Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk) 14:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

See https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil//tcdat/tc2021/SH/SH122021/txt/trackfile.txt Dam222 🌋 (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Well, despite that I was meaning... I believe gust option should be removed then. Also, I would like to question as if it is fair to use that ATCF file since it could be overridden after its first update, ? Thanks :) Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk) 15:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Samuel Ikin
Hi,

Samuel Ikin is a notable new graphic designer and photographer in Combe Down. This is not spam as having a Wikipedia page and links will help boost his online presence and contribute to forwarding his career. I am keenly interested in his work and would not like to see him discouraged. His work is sensitive and moving, especially his photography, and I feel it would benefit this encyclopaedia to have a mention of him.

Many Thanks,

user — Preceding unsigned comment added by I Only Edit Grammar (talk • contribs) 13:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The source you were using was spam. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

It is his Instagram page? An official portfolio of his work? According to the rules, this is allowed as it is an official source - user

We cannot use Facebook Instagram for source. Read Reliable Sources and Notability Dam222  🌋 (talk) 13:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

- Yes, we can. as it states in the linked ref. "An official link is a link to a website or other Internet service that meets both of the following criteria:

The linked content is controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article."

This instagram page is run by the subject. Also, the notability source is for separate pages whereas this is a mention in a page

Exuse me?
Please refrain from accusing me of vandalism when my edits are clearly in line with our guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:3A63:1501:162:EF34:3EC9:8B10 (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi Dam222. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ADam222 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 21:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Congrats for getting rollback. I'm going for rollback once I graduate from CVUA.  Mario Jump  83!  00:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Because you thanked me
10:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

WP Earthquakes participants
Hi Dam222, I've reformatted the WP Earthquakes main page, adding a tab to take people to the list of participants. As there are many active and occasionally active editors on that list, I've removed the link to your short list of "Current members" and added those (including you) to the main list of participants. I hope that's okay. Best wishes, Mikenorton (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Joanna Jędrzejczyk
Hi, can I ask why my edit of Joanna Jędrzejczyk's page was reverted ? The statements that a) she mocked her mental health, b) Rose criticized her for it and c) that the criticism was echoed by most of the MMA community are all completely unsourced. No matter if it's true or not, it shouldn't be allowed to add whatever information without no source or reference to back up the statements whatsoever. Or am i wrong ? 2A02:AB04:2F43:5000:81FD:8E39:FF75:2262 (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry this happened due to being mobile lag. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Warning users
Hello Dam222, I noticed that you have the rollback right but you don't warn users after reverting their edits. I just wanted to drop by and let you know that you should start warning them. Thanks, -- Ashley yoursmile!  14:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Unsure why my entry was reverted
Hello Dam222, You reverted my changes to the Critical Reception section of the "I Am Not A Dog On A Chain" Wiki page. I have used fair reviews, added the references and citations where possible, so I just wanted to ask how my entry can be seen as vandalism of the page? IANADOC (talk) 15:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The link you entered was an external link Dam222 🌋 (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

ANI-notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ashley yoursmile!  07:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Broo
Why are you changing the wikipedia of nikhil vinay Prteamsoc (talk) 19:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

You had added unsourced information. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 19:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Chartered Investment Manager
You reverted one of my edits for Chartered Investment Manager (formerly Canadian Investment Manager)

perhaps you can assist. Currently, the link redirect from Chartered Investment manager TO Canadian Investment Manager.

it SHOULD be the other way around. the new and current one is called Chartered Investment Manager. Wikipedia should reflect the official title.

that is what i was trying to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asadqureshy85 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: —  Newslinger  talk   21:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
 * Hi Dam222, let's do a one-month trial. Please review the relevant pages (listed in the message on your user talk page) and follow the instructions to the best of your ability while reviewing pending changes at Special:PendingChanges over the course of the next month. When the permission is about to expire, please submit a new request to have the permission instated permanently upon review. —  Newslinger  talk   21:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

OH OK
ypu removed my post on kodungaloor. i wasnt completely sure — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easychair101 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Please use the source. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Cyclone Pyarr(2005)
It looks like you've stopped editing on the article Draft:Cyclone Pyarr (2005). I have seen that this storm caused 85 fatalities, sufficient to be made into an article, but your draft doesn't look like is has enough information to be actually considered by and administrator. If you want to expand it, I can help when I have time. Thank you! 2003 LN6 (talk) 20:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

user warning
I don't see why you were warning this user for vandalism. Please read Vandalism. This editor was trying to make constructive changes and may have been making changes against consensus but there was no vandalism. MB 20:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * If the user is warned again and again, he repeats the thing again and again, it is not vandalism ? Dam222 🌋 (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * No it is not. I suggested you read Vandalism where is says vandalism is the "malicious removal of encyclopedic content, or the changing of such content beyond all recognition, without any regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia." I have looked at this users recent edits and see nothing that would qualify as vandalism, their edits appear well-intentioned.


 * There were two warnings last month for adding uncited material, and then two warnings from you 15 minutes apart for "disruptive" editing - that is hardly doing the same thing again and again. MB 20:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * If the user intentionally does this then it is Vandalim, I have already read it, because of lag it happened, Thanks Dam222 🌋 (talk) 21:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * If they intentionally make changes that they believe are improvements - it is not vandalism. You reverted some changes that were not wrong. At Nanjing Dajiaochang Airport, they added the date the airport closed to the infobox which was clearly an improvement. There other edits were striking-out text that, although is against the WP:MOS (which was recently clarified), is done in many airport articles - so this user may have thought that was the correct thing to do. You just reverted everything with no explanation. MB 21:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

whos cora?
why would i sockpuppet if i wasnt banned, plus i only have 1 email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wowiskwpoopi (talk • contribs) 22:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

my page
i am sorry if you did not like my changes but i am lily morgan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reasad90 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Premature invitations
Please do not add the names of users to a WikiProject's roster unless they have actually accepted the invitation. Normally, we let them do it themselves. Also, this invitation was premature and grossly inappropriate. This person has a long history of edit-warring, and they were even socking for some time. Until they have proven that they're not longer a disruptive user, they should not be issued an invitation. Simple as that. And the more experienced users will be the judge of that. This applies to you as well. I've been seeing far too many premature invitations to users who clearly aren't ready yet. We've already had a discussion on the WPTC talk page on how to handle future invitations (in Archive 44), and I think that it's time that we start enforcing it. I've seen far too many cases of invitations to users who end up getting blocked for various issues, or are revealed to be the socks of an LTA. This kind of stuff makes us look completely incompetent. And honestly, there are plenty of other users who are fed up with this as well. If this continues, I will have no choice but to push for a binding invitation moratorium on WPTC (at least for the newer users who joined in the last 1–2 years). If this happens, anyone who breaches the moratorium will be subject to sanctions.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Understood. In March 10, I want to say that I am doing a recruitment pitch to make WPTC grow in this month. But I shouldn't have done that $#!7.  Mario Jump  83!  22:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: ~Swarm~ {sting} 02:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

A barnstar for you!
Thank you. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I dont know how to edit here. I tried. But thanks for your last edit. Wish I coukd get rid of the bad references. Or delete the whole thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YoursTruthfully (talk • contribs) 19:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

, I have posted guideline, see your talk page. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 19:52, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Last edit
Sorry I thought you edited it But it hurts us all. No one has interviewed a truthful account of family and friends.Just twisted interviews of her life and family. Family and friends of 65 yrs know better what she was like all the time., a meticulous, decent caring person. This is not decent to have this up now.She has not even been buried yet!. I belong as a member Wikipedia support donations but probably will cancel my membership, since I cant delete her whole bio page or references.Bad enough she had OCD depression since her mothers death she spiraled downward She is not one of NYs most famous hoarders as Mo Billings listed her here in a catagory. Alcoholics and drug addicts and rehab is acceptable. But mental health is not. It is a silent killer because people are afraid if being shamed. It can happen to anyone and until it happens that someone champions this illness it will stay in the closet. The legal red tape during the pandemic made it impossible to get to her by her CLOSE family members who live far away.Her published address and disappearance  online made it possible for 7 months for anyone to sneak in and get inside,  but legally family could not until cleared by legal red tape it all comes at a cost due to the redtape,lawyers,detectives,cleanup,etc

InvesTT Page
The InvesTT with its original content was created for InvesTT an investment promation agency located in Trinidad and Tobago. It appaears an Indian firm has "hijacked" the page and altered the content to reflect an Indian company investt.in.

Can the page be returned to its original contents and have the Indian person stopped from making continuous edits?

190.213.53.23 (talk) 19:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lists of earthquakes by year
Hello, Dam222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of earthquakes by year, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, Dam222,
 * It looks like a lot of work went into this draft article. If you'd like to return to working on it, you can ask for it to be restored at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 04:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Raj Pathrala
Hello, Dam222,

You tagged this page as gibberish but it was just not in English, it was not nonsense at all. If you use the Chrome browser, you should get the Google Translate extension and then you can highlight a section of text and translate it or even translate an entire page and see what the text says. To be considered "gibberish", the content has to be completely incoherent and not understandable, like "dkji30r8%%8dik~!v89"...that is gibberish. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Njukini


The page Njukini has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Lists of earthquakes by year
Hello, Dam222,

Just a head's up, this draft is due to be deleted via CSD G13 later tomorrow. Thought you might like to know. Liz Read! Talk! 05:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors
Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah Talk 03:37, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Pioneer Venus 2
It's across Wikipedia, so not sure how you missed it, but NASA's Pioneer Venus 2 (Venus multiprobe) had probes that did achieve soft landings on Venus. One source was already present on the page, which you must not have seen or read. Since you asked for more sources, here are some:


 * https://www.drewexmachina.com/2016/06/13/nasas-unintentional-venus-lander/
 * https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/pioneer_venus.html
 * https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/pvprobes.html
 * https://www.drewexmachina.com/2016/06/13/nasas-unintentional-venus-lander/
 * https://atmos.nmsu.edu/data_and_services/atmospheres_data/PIONEER_Venus/venus.html
 * https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/pioneer-13.htm
 * https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/ames/40-years-ago-pioneers-encounter-venus/

In the future, please read the sources on articles before removing content in such a manner. There were already sources for the landing, which you either failed to see or intentionally neglected. Jrcraft Yt (talk) 06:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)