User talk:Damicatz/Archive 1

You've just never heard of it like many others. Plaeop is a wonderful and exciting and i hope many others join me in studying it. Excuse me i didnt realize the SS was running wikipedia. If you took the time to read norm chomsky literary masterpiece on the JFK assassination you'd realize the heavy links between Oswald's abuses as a child and his obsession with the gun. I have irrefutable evidence JFK's fatal shot would have been taken by a M1 Grande instead of the sleeker phallus shaped mannlicher-carcano bolt action rifle.

Vandalism??
The edits I am making are not vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.205.250.105 (talk) 04:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

-let me quote from the link you provided "any effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism" -you argue that they are provocative statements, I claim it is fact. This group has had criminal warrants issued for their arrest, they are even recogonized by the FBI as an eco-terrorist group.

-changing a WP page to reflect facts i.e. classification as an eco-terrorist group is in no way in violation of the neutrality rule. It seems that your bias against my edits are in violation of neutrality as it were.

Safe sex NPOV concern
Heyas, I saw you tagged Safe sex with the NPOV tag, but didn't see an explanation on Talk:Safe sex. If there is a part of the article you are concerned about being POV, I'd be happy to help address those concerns and bring the article into conformity with the NPOV policy. Tags like that need to have explanations in order to be helpful. Any insight you can provide would be apprecaited. Thanks! -SocratesJedi | Talk 06:40, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah, hey thanks for your reply. I removed the tag, but I'll go and check that out.  I think that those comments were semi-outdated and have been talking with User:Sci guy about some other edits to the article too, but I'll do make sure about that too (that it really is the case that those concerns are old, if they are not, I'll re-add the NPOV tag).  Thanks for your concerns and your reply though!  -SocratesJedi | Talk 22:18, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

DB
Please be a bit more careful about speedy tagging - you tagged Homesick as nonsense when it was it was quite clearly a carefully written book review. -- RHaworth 04:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism protection
Hey, thanks for explaining and not just deleting without saying anything. I thought that only admins could do it, but then I saw a non-admin do it, so I guess I was misled. There really should be a vprotect on Featured Articles though.. I'm not sure why no one has put one up.


 * It did clear it up, thank you. And I'm sorry I screwed up your discussion page twice in a row by accident.. Dan 06:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Damicatz
You wouldn't happen to be damicatz from upnetwork, would you?PiccoloNamek 08:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey, just making sure. There's more than one PiccoloNamek, believe it or not, so I thought there just might be another dami. Anyway, thanks for reverting my userpage. That guy needs to get a life!PiccoloNamek 08:14, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your attention to the Arcata Eye page. I believe the anonymous editors are members or close associates of the Plazoid, and are thus prone to a certain point of view regarding the Eye. --Metatree 23:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Pro-Test
I have actually just asked for Peer Review for the article so as to get some other perspectives. So far, the only sourced criticism of Pro-Test is in the article, and being associated with the group myself I don't feel I'm in a good position to make those criticisms myself. Thanks for the tip, though. --ProTestOxford 20:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for policing User:Dcfleck. --Dcfleck 00:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

no one asked you
69.179.75.234 03:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

don't be so darn happy either 69.179.75.234 03:49, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

I didn't remove it that time!!!! 69.179.75.234 03:56, 13 February 2006 (UTC)


 * 1) you didn't understand that last remark

2.I just made it so you had to scroll down

3.You have never used an ip, with an ip you can not create articles, and even my user page is considered an article

when i said scroll down i meant this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.179.75.234&diff=39442203&oldid=39442174

And i did not know that was a warning


 * You're probably having a good day if an anon tells you not to be so darn happy ; )
 * Adrian~enwiki (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please don't vandalize my userpage. The IP address was me. I wasn't logged in. Thank you. --Analogdemon (talk) 01:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Nice touch putting it up for deletion. You, nor anyone else, can bully me around.  --Analogdemon (talk) 02:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I will not stop just because certain admins consider this in bad taste. They do not represent the "community" so therefore, they are in the minority.  Five admin's opinions do not represent consensus.

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page! I greatly appreciate it. --Hansnesse 02:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Really? Are you sure I could get blocked? That's not my interpretation of the WP blocking policy. May I respectfully suggest that you are mistaken.

Thanks!

I'm sorry, however I must respectfully disagree. I feel that I am contributing factual content.

Thanks again!

Image Tagging for Image:Altosystem.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Altosystem.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Unix Games

 * In regards to the UNIX Games Catagory : UNIX, when used correctly, refers to AT&T's orginal UNIX operating system and their direct revisions such as UNIX System V. To my knowledge, none of the games listed in that category run on System V or any of the orginal Unices'. At the very least, I believe the category should be renamed to indicate that it is for games that run on UNIX-like operating systems. I still, however, believe that it is redundant. The games listed appear on the category pages of the operating systems they run on individually and none of those games, to my knowledge, are compatible with all modern UNIX-like operating systems. - Damicatz 20:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes UNIX was developed by AT&T, but it now applies to a number of different flavors supported by different vendors. So I suppose I shall have to disagree with your statement "when used correctly" since I'm supporting several of those flavors of UNIX right now, and it doesn't feel incorrect to be calling them UNIX. Yes it's entirely possible that some of the listed games are inappropriately catalogued. Rogue, at least, seems quite appropriate for the UNIX games category, at least in my mind. But maybe you don't consider the Berkeley flavor to be UNIX? :-) Thanks. &mdash; RJH (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Berkely UNIX is a UNIX-derivitive but none of the orginal UNIX code remains. So it is a UNIX-like operating system or a UNIX-style operating system but it is not UNIX. - Damicatz 21:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm aware of the history, thanks. Looks like you will be busy cleaning up the Category:Unix of all the UNIX derivations. Good luck. &mdash; RJH (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Zilog Z80.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zilog Z80.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 04:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Thomasvista.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thomasvista.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Thomasvistainside.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thomasvistainside.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:L Intel-C4004 (gray traces).jpg
Could you check the fair use rationale at Image:L Intel-C4004 (gray traces).jpg. Thanks! Addhoc 17:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:L Intel-C4004 (gray traces).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:L Intel-C4004 (gray traces).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

pupilometer
Hi! It's been a while since the article pupilometer was written. The original user that was the author no longer exists. I don't see any references to validate the nomenclature, although there is use of it as an Ophthalmic Instrument to measure the distance between of the PD, or pupillary distance from eye to eye when fitting eyeglasses to align the optic centers of a prescription. Would you concur to changing the content of the article? I don't know what your original contribution was, but found this link to your user_talk page in the history. StationNT5Bmedia 02:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Intel 8086.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Intel 8086.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 01:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Altodraw.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Altodraw.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 14:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Vistachevy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vistachevy.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 05:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Intel 80186.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Intel 80186.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Intel P3Socket.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Intel P3Socket.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Intel P3Slot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Intel P3Slot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Altodraw.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Altodraw.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leilaandthesnakesfront.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leilaandthesnakesfront.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

New policy proposal that may be of interest
I'm tapping this message out to you because you were involved at the AfDs of Eve Carson or Lauren Burk. Following both of these heated debates, a new proposal has been made for a guideline to aid these contentious debates, which can be found at WP:N/CA. There is a page for comments at Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions should you wish to make a comment. Thanks for your time, and apologies if this was not of interest! Fritzpoll (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Motorola 68060.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Motorola 68060.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Motorola 68040.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Motorola 68040.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Edit war
If I use the discussion nobody will see, I want know why the things that I put are "irevelant" and the others things in here don't. Renanx3 (talk) 17:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety talk 03:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page :D  Matt  (  Talk  )   06:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting my error.
Thank you for taking the effort to correct my error, in which I reverted completely fine edits at Proginet. 69.74.132.154 requested that I preserve all the dits he made, which I reverted for no reason. I have not looked into that because you also took the opportunity to make further rolback, and I'm not sure if you've done so, so I'm just checking with you. Thank you! Optakeover (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Thats ok, that was my userpage prob. didn´t log in, so just one question how do you freeze or end an account? Thank you Cyrus111 (talk) 01:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Pghcollectibles
You reverted this edit on Pghcollectibles. Please remember that when an author blanks their own page, that is to be interpreted not as vandalism, but as request for the page to be deleted (per WP:CSD). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)