User talk:Damonrusst

Welcome to the Wikipedia!
Welcome to the Wikipedia, Damonrusst! Hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! And thanks for adding the Cooperative Research link to the September 11, 2001 attacks article. Here are some perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:


 * Take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial and Manual of Style.
 * When you have time, take a look at The five pillars of Wikipedia, and assume good faith, but keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
 * Always keep the notion of NPOV in mind, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your unique perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
 * If you need any help, post your question at the Help Desk.
 * Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Boilerplate text, Brilliant prose, Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Utilities, Verifiability, Village pump, Wikiquette

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes: &#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;. Best of luck, Damonrusst, and have fun! Ombudsman 10:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

AFD Alert!
The list of researchers is now being AFDed. See Articles for deletion/9/11 conspiracy theories/September 11 researchers. I'm counter-proposing that it be kept and moved to its own page. Blackcats 23:14, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Proposal alert!
I have officially proposed to split the "9/11 conspiracy theories" article, with the two most in depth areas being moved to separate articles at Allegations of Jewish or Israeli complicity in 9/11 and Allegations of U.S. government complicity in 9/11. Please check out the discussion at Talk:9/11_conspiracy_theories. Thank you. Blackcats 21:21, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. FlyingToaster (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Sarah Palin has been reverted, as it introduced unsourced or poorly sourced negative or controversial biographical material. Please do not continue to add such information. Thank you.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Hobartimus (talk) 07:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked for 72 hours for repeated vandalism to Sarah Palin.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 07:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * And I blocked you for a week for your latest edit to Jeb Bush. If you continue vandalising after this block expires, your next block will be an indefinite block. Garion96 (talk) 08:09, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Heather Gemmen Wilson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heather Gemmen Wilson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heather Gemmen Wilson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 17:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)