User talk:Damotclese/Archive 2

Please comment on Talk:Producerism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Producerism. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC) I will not comment on that one, the subject is too contentious and the warring parties will probably not accept comments any way. Damotclese (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Drafts
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Drafts. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Photography is Not a Crime
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Photography is Not a Crime. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Enough people have commented on this (and opposed) that I will not comment. One thing: Someone said that there was a personal attack in the comments that were offered and I disagree. Damotclese (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pacific Solution
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pacific Solution. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC) The RFC was not stated properly in that Talk:: page, the RFC template was posted to the top of the page yet there was not a description of the specifics of the discussion's contention(s) which often results in people not commenting. I added a request for one of the editors to fill out the RFC according to policy a little better. Damotclese (talk) 17:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Progressive tax
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Progressive tax. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC) I commented onthis RFC since what we're looking at here is whether a text blocks hould be included or not, and checking the text it looks like the text is not academic, not encyclopedic and -- if the citations are legitimate at all -- are obscure and holds minute weight. I recommended that the text be omitted as did most RFC comments. Damotclese (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Georgism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Georgism. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC) I commented on this and suggested that the proposed text be eliminated since it is not supported by any testable references however looking over the actual article I find that it needs a lot of work, definitions and descriptions of the subject matter are missing. Damotclese (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cryptocurrency
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cryptocurrency. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC) An editor removed the RFC tag, it looks like without awaiting any Third Party commentary. I asked if that was suitable or not; the RFC 'bot probably sent several editors to go look, only to find the RFC was removed. Damotclese (talk) 19:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Prometheus (2012 film)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prometheus (2012 film). — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC) This RFC was not stated clearly, it's a jumbled mess so I will not be commenting on it other than to ask that the RFC be cleaned up. Damotclese (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Single-payer health care
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Single-payer health care. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC) I commented on this in the Talk:: page. The issue was whether a list of external links should be included, asking which if any should be included in the article. Checking them the are all suitable for inclusion so I noted as such. Also the RFC lacked clarity about what the issue(s) of debate was however I expect that Republican opposition to a black man being President of the United States may have motivated the RFC more than the desire to ensure suitability of external links. Damotclese (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brooklyn Bridge
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Brooklyn Bridge. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC) Nobody lives in Brooklyn. I won't comment on that RFC. Damotclese (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Progressive tax
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Progressive tax. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brooklyn Bridge
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Brooklyn Bridge. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC) Nobody lives in Brooklyn. Damotclese (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:House of Cards (U.S. TV series)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:House of Cards (U.S. TV series). — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC) The RFC tag was applied to that Talk:: page however there was no RFC stated. Damotclese (talk) 15:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yelp, Inc.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Yelp, Inc.. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC) I commented on this one. There was proposed textual resolution to the issue that the editors were asking about, and the proposed text sounded good, it was definitive and descriptive. When talking about right-wing corporations like Yelp, avoiding rhetoric -- and avoiding advertising/promotion-sounding text -- I think deserves extra effort to work things neutrally. Damotclese (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Beef Products
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Beef Products. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC) I provided comment on this. The information proposed was perfectly reasonable and legitimate to include, I don't see any reason why the information should not be offered to peoople researching the subject. I can see why corporate interests would be embarrassed by the information however that is not relevant. Damotclese (talk) 19:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Deadliest Warrior episodes
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Deadliest Warrior episodes. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC) Television, I don't watch television.Damotclese (talk) 00:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Puerto Rico
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Puerto Rico. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC) I won't comment on that. The two references that are offered consists of a book on one hand, and an academic University on the other, and on the whole I would choose the University over some person's for-profit book however I don't have an opinion on whether the proposed text should be included at all so I did not respond. Damotclese (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hinduism in Pakistan
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hinduism in Pakistan. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC) Yikes! Well, that page has some major potential to be contentious. :) I commented after I checked the proposed reference and felt that the vandalism and looting did not constitute oppression, repression, nothing so grand. Damotclese (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ethecon Foundation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ethecon Foundation. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC) I commented on this. When an editor reverses another edtor's contributions without comment it is usually due to the reversing editor's ideological motivations, not due to a legitimate problem with the proposed text. Checking the text that kept getting reversed without comment I don't find anything monstrably wrong with the proposed text, the editor making the reverts, I suggested, needs to refrain. Damotclese (talk) 17:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of former child actors from the United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of former child actors from the United States. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC) I will not comment on that. I'm not sure why Wikipedia even has a page that covers this. Damotclese (talk) 19:08, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

March 9 edit-a-thon at MOCA in downtown LA
'''Golly that is temping. However I to a lot of things on the weekends, no time for this.''' Damotclese (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronan Farrow
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ronan Farrow. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC) Yuck, I don't do "celibrity" nonsense. I won't comment on this.Damotclese (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pablo Casals
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pablo Casals. — 10.4.1.125 (talk) 00:06, 6 March 2014 (UTC) I will not comment on that, enough people have commented on it enough. Damotclese (talk) 00:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Apparebtly this issue has been closed. Damotclese (talk) 18:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

MMR vaccine controversy
Interesting issue with the MMR vaccine controversy page which is subject to heavy ideology-based edits. Wikipedia attempts to be encyclopedic and provide testable, falsifiable, scientific information in the arena of scientific issues and I'm happy to see a number of volunteer editors working to eliminate ideology-based, biased text suggestions in such pages. It shows that people care enough about Wikipedia quality to revert inappropriate changes and to suggest Wiki guidelines for the disruptive WP:SAP to follow.

Thanks to everyone working on the MMR vaccine controversy page to keep it accurate. Damotclese (talk) 16:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your email but I'm working with USAMRIID now, I do not have time to edit Wikipedia. Was this the page you wanted me to comment on? I watch the page but have not been checking changes for several months. I see there are editors already fixing problem changes, I don't need to get involved, do I? BiologistBabe (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Also I don't believe you meant WP:SAP I believe you meant "Single Issue Account." BiologistBabe (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Oh yes, User:BiologistBabe you are correct, I meant WP:SPA. No, please do not bother, other editors are addressing the problems. Thanks! Damotclese (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)


 * No problem. I see many pages I should have paid attention to, I need to return to Wikipedia but who has the time any more? BiologistBabe (talk) 17:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yelp, Inc.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Yelp, Inc.. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC) I commented on this. The information suggested should be kept as is since the ifnromation is informative, accurate, and also does not violate any Wiki guidelines. Damotclese (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Hey, I went to read your comment on my iPhone and accidentally clicked "undo" and reverted your edit (I reverted myself). Just wanted to make sure you knew it was an accident and now fixed ;-) CorporateM (Talk) 16:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * No problem, CorporateM! When people revert my comments I don't care very much. :) Maybe if we were all paid for our volunteer editing time I would care more. :) Also thank you very much for your time to comment on that article. Thanks! Damotclese (talk) 18:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Controversy about media coverage of the 2009 Greek debt crisis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Controversy about media coverage of the 2009 Greek debt crisis. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Well that is amusing, the page was deleted before it could be RFC'd. :) Damotclese (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Source templates
Hello. Have you tried User:ProveIt GT? You might find it helpful, especially for articles with a tone of refs, like Narconon. I think it's enabled in the preferences tab. Also, I like to add 'accessdate' as a field to help offset linkrot, especially for Narconon's own sites, since it seems likely to me that those sites might not always be around. Cheers. Grayfell (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox film
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. — Legobot (talk) 18:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC) Templates are something IO have difficulty with so I won't comment on that. Damotclese (talk) 22:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of countries by average wage
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of countries by average wage. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC) I commented on that. The need for a single suitable source for all information is already apparent in the comments of the editors who have responded. Until a single source work can be performed, the proposed text I suggested should be excluded. Damotclese (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

avg wage page
I need your help. On the avg wage page, they are insisting on using numbers from a BBC article which quotes figures from ILO. Here are some facts and issues. The BBC article is a few years old, and the ILO data no longer exists on the ILO website, raising a presumption that it has been deleted and retracted. In addition, for most countries listed, we already have TWO other sources which actually match eachother quote nicely, just that one is monthly and the other annual. The ILO data for some countries directly contradicts the two other sources, and in fact when I did a simple calculation on the talk page using the same meth of the ILO, the figures were radically different, but similar to the other two sources. This lends further credence as to why ILO deleted the figures. What is the policy for a page quoting numbers which has later been deleted by that source, and for which there is redundancy in that list to begin with? I have proposed not using the ILO list due to these issues, or perhaps using it for countries not mentioned in other two lists. What do you think? Lneal001 (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. So what do I do? It is clear that I think one source should not be used for the reasons mentioned above.Lneal001 (talk) 02:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC) This is another one I will not get involved in, enough people have commented anyway. Damotclese (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gender representation in video games
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gender representation in video games. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC) This was not an RFC, it was an appeal for third party on a subject that requires professional research to avoid extensive bias. Damotclese (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC) That article should not even be on Wikipedia. In any event the RFC was not formed properly and it was closed. Damotclese (talk) 14:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:RT (TV network)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:RT (TV network). — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Editors with anti-Russia ideologies trying to cram unevidenced "some people say" rhetoric in to the preamble of the article. Damotclese (talk) 19:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Would you come back and explain yourself a little more clearly? It's a discussion not a vote? Maybe you could point to some policy that has been overlooked? It probably isn't helpful to jump to the conclusion that we're all anti-Russian before getting involved in the discussion? I haven't seen any evidence that would support it. --Trappedinburnley (talk) 20:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No. Damotclese (talk) 15:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bacula
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bacula. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC) I commented on that RFC. There are two products, one spun off from the other. The Wikipedia page has both products described within the single page and I suggested that a second page be spawned off from the first so that as the two products diverage and evolve, so should the Wikipedia page. Damotclese (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Narendra Modi
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Narendra Modi. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC) I responded to this. The phrase "human development" is being discussed. The phrase is meaningless and the preamble should be removed. Damotclese (talk) 16:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Location map Israel
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Location map Israel. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Ha! Never. I don't get involved in political terrorism issues. Damotclese (talk) 00:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Gun politics in the United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment at Gun politics in the United States. Thank you.Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Good grief. That whole Wiki page is crammed packed with false statements and religious beliefs. The article fails WP:NPOV profoundly. Damotclese (talk) 00:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Traffic (band)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Traffic (band). — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2014 (UTC) I won't respond to this one, either. Damotclese (talk) 00:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Narconon Arrowhead closure
I don't want to get involved in the Narconon article (and well, I can't), but there seems to be some time-wasting confusion on the Talk page about what was closed that I might be able to help with.

The same-old Narconon Arrowhead drug rehab, with the same CARF certification as they've always had since the Chilocco days, remains open. Since the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (page 2) gave up about the same time as the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services fired their two investigators, I doubt that'll change soon.

They had also opened a Narconon Arrowhead medical detox at a separate location in McAlester, and were operating with a temporary permit. A medical detox uses drugs to ramp people down off their addiction where going cold turkey would be medically dangerous. After that they go to the drug rehab. The Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services declined to issue them a full certification, their temporary permit expired, and it was closed.

That's what I found in a quick rummage. Feel free to rummage yourself: http://umbraxenu.no-ip.biz/mediawiki/index.php/Category:Narconon. Oops, no-ip domains are blacklisted. (Sorry for the lack of a chronological list. I blame MediaWiki and I'll be correcting that.) AndroidCat (talk) 23:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you, AC. Great seeing you again. :) I'll get my dung together and clean the page up better. It's a good effort all around. Damotclese (talk) 16:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bliss (image)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bliss (image). — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC) Enough editors have responded to that so I will not. Damotclese (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Information revolution
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Information revolution. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC) At least 4 other editors have commented and I agree with each of them so I will not bother to comment on this RFC. Damotclese (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:5WPR
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:5WPR. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC) I will not be commenting on this RFC Damotclese (talk) 15:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jodie Foster
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jodie Foster. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC) I will not respond to this RFC either. Damotclese (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on User talk:CorporateM/Extant Organizations
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:CorporateM/Extant Organizations. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC) I commented on this. The page is a user essay which tyraditionally means that the originating editor gets to decide issues unless there are obvious factual problems with the essay's contents in which case conflict resolution processes should take place. Damotclese (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Citation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Citation. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC) I will not get involved in this one. Damotclese (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

LA edit-a-thons on May 23 and 31

 * Alas I can't go to anything like that. :( Damotclese (talk) 18:38, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronn Torossian
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ronn Torossian. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC) No time Damotclese (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of media adaptations of Journey to the West
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of media adaptations of Journey to the West. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC) Ha! Good bloody gods, no. I avoid "popular culture" Damotclese (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Argentina–Indonesia relations
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Argentina–Indonesia relations. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC) I commented on that, the two pages should be kept isolated and should be expanded upon. Damotclese (talk) 15:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Enough people have commented on that so I do not need to. Damotclese (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Progressive tax
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Progressive tax. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Too many people have commented on that already, and in fact the article fails WP:NPOV any way so I won't bother. Damotclese (talk) 15:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Georgism
There is an RfC at Talk:Georgism concerning scope of the article. This is a neutral notification. Collect (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC) I did a comment on this one. The question is whether the article should state something when really the RFC should be asking if there are supporting citations and references for the proposed edit. Damotclese (talk) 16:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Pan-nationalist concepts
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Pan-nationalist concepts. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC) The RFC was not done properly so I'll ignore it. Damotclese (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello,

You can help determine consensus by commenting at the RfC at Talk:Ta-Nehisi Coates. Your input would be appreciated. Thank you. Useitorloseit (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, there was already concensus, this editor is simply refusing to accept that concensus. I recommended banning. Damotclese (talk) 22:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States Senate election in North Carolina, 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States Senate election in North Carolina, 2014. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC) I will not comment on this. Voting is for idiots. Damotclese (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Academi
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Academi. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC) I replied to that, an issue of a terrorist organization operating under multiple names in an effort to avoid its own reputation. Damotclese (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Georgism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Georgism. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC) I already commented on this, the 'Bot called me twice. Damotclese (talk) 23:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Parmigiano-Reggiano
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Parmigiano-Reggiano. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC) Meh, I don't want to comment on that, too complicated. :) Damotclese (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab). — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Ha! Well, I posted my opinion on that. Basically it's an appeal to require a better quality level of information for a certain class of pages. :) Damotclese (talk) 16:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:VisualEditor/VisualEditor default state 2014 part 1
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:VisualEditor/VisualEditor default state 2014 part 1. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2014 (UTC) I will not be responding to this RFC. Damotclese (talk) 15:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:GMMSF Box-Office Entertainment Awards
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:GMMSF Box-Office Entertainment Awards. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Oh hell no! I'm not gettihng involved in that nonsense. Damotclese (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * == Please comment on Wikipedia:Media Viewer/June 2014 RfC ==

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Media Viewer/June 2014 RfC. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC) I did not respond to this, enough people have opinions, mine is not needed. Damotclese (talk) 15:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Navarre-geo-stub
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Navarre-geo-stub. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC) I commented on this, two different pictures, one of which is cloudy and fuzzy and the other which is clean and clear, the question of which to use should not even have been RFCed. Damotclese (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)