User talk:Damotclese/Archive 4

Please comment on Talk:World Vision International
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:World Vision International. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC) I commented on that RFC. Damotclese (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Gets in to tempates so I won't respond. Damotclese (talk) 16:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of YouTube personalities
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of YouTube personalities. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC) I commented on this. Corporations are not people, and they are not personalities. Damotclese (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox album
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox album. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC) I will not be commenting on this. Damotclese (talk) 16:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC) I did not comment on this. Damotclese (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fractional-reserve banking
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fractional-reserve banking. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC) Too complicated for me so I'm going to not comment. Damotclese (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Steve Scalise
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Steve Scalise. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Ug. No thanks. Damotclese (talk) 15:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Weeknd
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Weeknd. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC) Enough editors have commented on that one so I will not. Damotclese (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Breitbart (website)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Breitbart (website). — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC) A page about a right wing Christian Republican extremist propaganda blog seeks to include text lifted from a second right wing Christian Republican extremist blog... Um... let me think about it... NO! Of course not. Damotclese (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Version 2.0
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Version 2.0. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC) I don't know anything about "Version 2.0" so I will not be commenting. Damotclese (talk) 16:09, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Port of Felixstowe
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Port of Felixstowe. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC) I commented on this. Damotclese (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Turkic dynasties and countries
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Turkic dynasties and countries. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC) I commented on this. I don't know anything about Turk history so I probably did not contribute much. :) Damotclese (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Neo-feudalism
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Neo-feudalism. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC) I responded to that RFC. Damotclese (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Doctor
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Doctor. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC) I will not comment on this. Damotclese (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film). — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC) I will not be commenting on this. Damotclese (talk) 00:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Version 2.0
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Version 2.0. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC) This is the third time I've been asked to look at this page, I won't do it again. Damotclese (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually I did comment. Looking at the history I see I was called twwice, not three times. I also see thatthere are two RFCs pending for this article and that no third party editors have bothered to respond yet. Damotclese (talk) 16:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wikia
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wikia. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC) RFC tag is not worded properly. Damotclese (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gender variance
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gender variance. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC) No way am I getting involved in that. Damotclese (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC) A proposal to change the use of "stalker" to "watcher" apparently for no other reason than some people consider "stalker" to be offenseive. I'm opposed. Damotclese (talk) 15:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC) I will not comment on this. Damotclese (talk) 16:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2015 (UTC) I will not comment on this. Damotclese (talk) 16:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please join the discussion on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)
Hello, I am soliciting comments for an RfC that is currently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page. There is disagreement about where the film was set (New York vs. Chicago). One of the issues is whether it is original research to cite to elements in the film itself (including props, dialogue, and a statement in the end credits that it was "filmed on location in New York City") to establish setting. Response so far in the RfC has been mixed. Comments welcome! Xanthis (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC) I will not be commenting on this. Damotclese (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Walter O'Brien
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Walter O'Brien. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Enough editors have commented on this that I do not need to. Damotclese (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on User talk:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on User talk:Valoem/Involuntary celibacy. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Enough editors have commented so I will not. Damotclese (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Afc decline
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Afc decline. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC) I do not know anything about this so I will decline to comment. Damotclese (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fire engine
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fire engine. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC) I commented on this since I work in a forest. :) Damotclese (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Advanced capitalism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Advanced capitalism. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:History of economic thought
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of economic thought. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC) I will not be commenting on this. Damotclese (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC) I will not be commenting on this. Damotclese (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Capital accumulation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Capital accumulation. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC) I will not be responding to this RFC. Damotclese (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Capitalist mode of production
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Capitalist mode of production. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC) Pointless nonsense, I won't comment. Damotclese (talk) 14:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Production, costs, and pricing
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Production, costs, and pricing. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Good grief, more right wing buttfuckery. No, I won't comment on this, either. Damotclese (talk) 15:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Winners
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Winners. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Petty, I won't respond. Damotclese (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:MyWikiBiz
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MyWikiBiz. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC) I don't have time to look at this today. Damotclese (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Scientology fake front Criminon
Hey, DamOT, would you check out the Scientology organization's fake front called "Criminon" and see if the page needs updating? As you commented some time ago the fake front appears to be obsolete / defunct. The article should probably be updated to reflect that. BiologistBabe (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I will check, I believe that the crime syndicate fake front is defunct, the crooks aren't using it any more but I don't know if that should be mentioned on the syndicate's page, I'll check. Damotclese (talk) 15:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brown rice
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brown rice. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC) I commented on this, the article does seem to give much weight to arsenic beyond the scope of the article. Damotclese (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC) I commented on this. The video series is a conspiracy belief on the order of the so-called "911 Truth" conspiracy videos usually found no YouTube, and as such the series is best classified as Fantasy Fiction. Damotclese (talk) 16:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

BB's comment page?
BB is still in Africa, she sent me an email asking that I comment on a page but I can't find it. Since you work in her department did she mention which page it was? Was it locomotive related?

By the way, this is Karen, I finally created an account after getting badgered by BB. ha ha. She can be a beeyotch some times but we love her. TrainsOnTime (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


 * As a long time editor, you should know that recruiting friends or associates to participate in deletions discussion is looked poorly upon. Please do not continue to recruit your friends and associates to try to sway the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:36, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Good grief. And so very typical of some of the abusive editors we find on Wikipedia. Gogo, you know nothing of who I work with, why my colleagues are, what their specialities are, nothing. Go away and mind your own business and stop trying to interdict editors working on the project. You might also look up Wikipedia guidelines on civility. Thanks. Damotclese (talk) 15:56, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Ha, thanks, Damo, I had to laugh some in anticipation and expectation that you never speak with me ever again because someone on Wikipedia told you to. Blissful silence at last! TrainsOnTime (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Re your message: It is obvious from various posts that you know each other and that's fine, but the specific act of recruiting people you know to sway a discussion is looked poorly upon.


 * Funny that you mention Wikipedia's civility guideline because I think you are the one who needs to read it. I was completely civil to you while you were not to me.  If you feel that I overstepped my bounds by either reminding you of Wikipedia's appropriate guidelines and policies, feel free to report me to WP:ANI or any other appropriate venue. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * That is always the case, you don't understand how Wikipedia guidelines work and yet you feel you have no inhibitions about "explaining" it to editors who do. That's rather very typical of some people and why so many editors eventually abandon the project, because of uncivil, unprofessional people interdicting editors' contributions.
 * Don't forget that Wikipedia is a volunteer effort, and your violations of Wikipedia civility guidelines hampers volunteer's motivations. But I see you don't accept the admonishments. If you do it again I will request that a moderator to evaluate your behavior. Gogo Dodo Also I would appreciate it if you avoid posting anything further to my Talk: page. When you feel the need to violate civility, please go elsewhere. Thanks. Damotclese (talk) 22:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, by the way, since I work to be polite and professional, I will not be responding to any further nonsense other than to direct your behavior to approriate moderation. Thanks. Damotclese (talk) 22:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I had one of these people send me email complaining about an update to the ATCS protocol series so I disabled email from other editors. Yes, I think most editors give up when, but if you go to the meetings in Los Angeles you get to meet serious, dedicated editors and it makes up for the uncivilized ones. TrainsOnTime (talk) 22:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not going anywhere, at least not until I finish the Xorail page :) -- unless you want to do it. :) But I don't mind, this is expected, one can't get discouraged by a few, this is a volunteer effort for the passionate, people who believe in Wikipedia and volunteer time to make it better. You'll recall the a.r.s fiasco which resulted in Scientology getting banned, now that was a Wikifight! Damotclese (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ale Resnik
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ale Resnik. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC) I commented on this. The fact that the editor noted he has an interest in the proposed text does not detract from the legitimacy of the contents of the proposed update. I suggested he proceed with the update. Damotclese (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File 18
I see that they deleted File 18 anyway despite no serious reason. I did like the editor's comments on why the decision was made, though, that was done politely and with consideration. It's a shame that a page that has been vandalized and opposed for so many years was eventually deleted, now a couple of thousand links on the network are broken. That should make the web site owners somewhat annoyed. TrainsOnTime (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah. --sigh-- Some times you win, some times other editors win. The problem here is that researchers lose. Damotclese (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, Karen, also check the Grade Crossing Predictor page which does not exist yet... Though I suppose if you create that one we'll just have some unprofessional yahoo delete it -- that seems to be a growing problem on Wiki these past 4, 5 years. :( Damotclese (talk) 22:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I am working on the page this weekend, I'll post it when it's completed. Do you have others that are not present that should be? TrainsOnTime (talk) 22:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rape jihad
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rape jihad. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC) I commente don this after checking the proposed / current referenced material and noted that the source appears to be legitimate. This is a highly contended page with likely vandalism which usually calls for more references and citations to bolster existing references -- something which assists editors in reducing (if not eliminating) Wikiwars. The subject material is depressing, but the vandalism doesn't help. Damotclese (talk) 15:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I see thatthe page has been deleted, the source was a Christian Republican hate cult and as such did not belong on Wikipedia. Damotclese (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC) I commented on this. As was noted previously, rollback is done to remove likely vandalism so it's a special case which can also be abused like anything else. Damotclese (talk) 15:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Heber Jentzsch in The Hole
If you have time, you might update the Heber Jentzsch page to note the current disposition of this person. BiologistBabe (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I will. He was put in The Hole years ago but nobody who has escaped recently has gone public with the information about him in a way that would be suitable for Wikipedia. Damotclese (talk) 21:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Beepi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Beepi. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC) I commented on this. There are a lot of articles that verge upon promotion and advertising, and this is one of them, however the suggested text to add provides more information and does not hurt the article. Damotclese (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Death of Freddie Gray
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Freddie Gray. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I commented on this. The terms used to describe peolpe's skin hue are not consistant in the media or among the world's human populace, so I don't see any need for the article to select one term or another. I suggedted that a mix be used without any attempt to unify. Damotclese (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC) I don't need to respond to this, many editors have already Damotclese (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Poland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poland. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC) The page has a long history of edit warring, I'm not going to get involved. Damotclese (talk) 15:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC) I commented on this, the proposed suggestion is a good one. Damotclese (talk) 16:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Embraer E-Jet E2 family
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Embraer E-Jet E2 family. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC) I responded. Basically the reverting editing deals with the selection of a single word to describe a company. Damotclese (talk) 15:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:H:IPA
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:H:IPA. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC) I don't see a need to respond to this one. Damotclese (talk) 14:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)