User talk:Damuna/Archive 1

request for comment on Hugh Hefner
Please take the time to go to Hugh Hefner's talkpage and respond to the request for comment on what jerrygraf is trying to add that does not belong on Hugh Hefner's page, but belongs on PEI's, as well as the part I deleted is ment as a "controversial comment on the biography of a living person"Rogue Gremlin 04:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Seeing as how your message is several months old, I'm not entirely sure what you're talking about. Could you please refresh my memory? --Muna (talk) 14:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I see you've not been welcomed. Welcome! WLU (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Sexy Losers and covert incest
Hi,

Regards this edit, which resulted in me reading the entire 260-odd strips of Sexy Loser, thanks! Would you say that that is 'covert incest'? There's no actual sex from what I remember, but it's far from covert. Compared to the Law and Order episode, which used the term 'Covert incest' explicitly, I'm not so sure I'd say this is as notable a use of the term. What do you think? Could you cite a specific strip that you think best represents the concept? WLU (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The idea of covert incest is that it emphasises inappropriate emotional relationships and behaviours between people who are related, as opposed to an actual sexual relationship (hey, what do you know? That's exactly what the overview says :D).

As for citing comics, I can use the common examples to show this:


 * Constant, uncomfortable attention (e.g., constant barrages of "I love my little princess").

This is pretty much self-explanatory. Examples include and


 * Inappropriate questions and discussions regarding the child's emerging sexuality.

See.


 * Discussions regarding the child's physical appearance in a sexual context.

No examples here, though there are probably quite good ones for it in the other categories.


 * Deliberate nudity in the child's presence.

Examples include (putting on a show),  and.


 * Covert and/or overt viewing of the child when s/he is bathing, dressing, etc.

See.


 * Leaving pornography around for other members of the household to see.

See.

Other examples can be compared from the text:

"The parent may also become extremely jealous and possessive of the child, attempting to limit the child's interactions with other adults or friends the child's own age."

This is seen in comics like this one, , (directly competing for her son's affection)

So, my conclusion is that, instead of any actual incest occurring (though Mrs Shibata does make a few attempts), what is happening follows more along the lines of covert incest, despite it being extreme for comedic purposes. --Muna (talk) 22:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd say it's a bit OR-ish, but what the hay. Thanks!  WLU (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I disagree, it's simply easily observable. I'm incredibly surprised that you didn't reach the same conclusion.


 * And, about the comment about notability from before: Sexy Losers already has a page (which has been there for about four years), and is clearly notable. Therefore, the idea that it isn't notable enough to be mentioned in an almost-barren "popular culture" section is a little absurb. If the subject was so prolific that it required a separate page I'd be inclined to agree with you. And there we have it. ;) --Muna (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'm not going to remove it or object further. WLU (talk) 20:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Removed DMCA section
The following is a section I removed from the DMCA article's criticism section. It is here in case somebody would like to restore it.

Example of DMCA Takedown Provision
An author notes that a company or individual infringed his or her copyright in publishing material without receiving permission first, paying a fee, or crediting the source of the information (plagiarism). If the author cannot find an arrangement with the offender, he or she can address a DMCA to the provider hosting the user website. This text contains several items to respond to. It can be sent by fax, ordinary postal mail, or even put on a website at the disposal of the provider. Not all providers accept receipt of the DMCA as scanned and signed images by email. Here is the template of the DMCA request that the author has to fill in and send to the alleged infringer:

In this context the DMCA does not require the complete postal address and private phone number of the author. Therefore, most companies do not list these two items in their policies (Google, Blogger) and only need an email of contact in respect with the spirit of the law.

Only a few companies require the author to mention his complete address and phone number (Go Daddy Software).

The postal address and phone number will only be required in cases of counter notification emitted by the offender or if the author initiates a legal proceeding.

Image thanks
It's no problem, all part of my duties as a Wikipedian. I saw it on my way to class today and I thought "Wow, I've got to get that for Wikipedia." All in a day's work! RyanGerbil10 (Говорить!) 02:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Prods
Muna, just in case you haven't noticed yet, the other day I replied to your questions about the prod on my talk page. If you want to contest it, just let me know and I will restore it for you. Cheers, Sarah 01:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Warhammer 40,000
As the section says, the list is not exhaustive. If you disagree with the entries on the list and/or think ssome entries are missing, please discuss it on the articles talk page. I have reverted the additions. Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 18:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Manchester United
Care to expand? On Anderson, I reverted on claim, and added a citation remark to another. On Nani (unless I missed something), the last edit I made was to revert a blantantly untrue edit regarding a transfer. Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 18:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Please clarify - which anon editor? Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You think this and this are good faith edits? Perhaps you have a different view on good faith edits. Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 23:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Popolocrois
I have a comment from you on the talk page of Popolocrois saying that the article is not written from NPOV (I think you put it up in 2006). Could you please look it over and see if we can remove the tag now? --Kraftlos (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Mieciu K
Ok, thanks for the information, I will keep that in mind. Mieciu K (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)