User talk:Dan1863Sickles

Welcome!

Hello, Dan1863Sickles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Love Play, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Karthik Nadar (talk) 12:57, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Love Play


A tag has been placed on Love Play requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Karthik Nadar (talk) 12:57, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Charity Hill (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charity Hill (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charity Hill (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW ( Talk ) 04:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Please come to the AfD and explain why the article is not a hoax. NW ( Talk ) 16:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Mary Gordon (writer), you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Mummy (1932 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Object Lessons (novel)


The article Object Lessons (novel) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Book does not meet the requirements at Notability (books).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bound by Desire


The article Bound by Desire has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Book does not meet the requirements at Notability (books).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 21:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Polly Parker Stories


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Polly Parker Stories, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Binksternet (talk) 22:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Hearth and Eagle


The article The Hearth and Eagle has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Book does not meet the requirements at Notability (books).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 22:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wicked Loving Lies


The article Wicked Loving Lies has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The book is mentioned in passing in one or two reliable sources as exemplary of a trend of worsening writing by Rosemary Rogers. It is mentioned in passing as an example of high sales but low quality. There is no dedicated coverage of the book, nor did it win any awards.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Binksternet (talk) 23:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating a hoax article, as you did at Charity Hill (novel). If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. NW ( Talk ) 02:43, 1 October 2011 (UTC)