User talk:Dan1980

re:DYK
Looks like the next update still needs at least one, if not two more hooks.-Andrew c [talk] 14:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Anyone can add hooks to the next update template, it is not admin protected. However, you shouldn't add your own hooks or your own articles to the next template. -Andrew c [talk] 17:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I mean, you should be comfortable with what makes a good DYK hook. I'd say, make sure that the hook has been on the suggestions page for at least 24 hours if not longer. In fact, start with the oldest hooks and add them first. Make sure that no one has objected to them. Make sure the facts in the hook are supported by citations in the article, and make sure the article meets DYK standards (length, creation date, etc). Then remove the hook (and the associated conversation, if there is any) from the suggestions page, and add it to the next update template. Hope this helps, and if you have more questions, feel free to ask.-Andrew c [talk] 18:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Football in Sheffield
Thanks for the barnstar. I seem to be on the charge again after a long time of not editing. I'm hoping to get Sheffield Rules up to FA standard next. There's a lot of revisionist material thats developed in recent years, especially over the 150th anniversary of the club, that sheds new light on how football as we know it was invented. After that it might be nice to get another Wednesday article featured. josh (talk) 02:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * As far as Sheffield Rules is concerned I think I've got the subject quite well covered. I want to get a national perspective on the rules influence. Our Winter Game by Charles Alcock sounds like a good book to read but its hard to get hold of and means going down to the British Library in London or somehow getting a look at Sheffield Uni's copy. A lack of photos is the other main problem. When I get round to it i'm going to go down the Sheffield Achieves where they have a copy of the 1862 rulebook that hopefully I'll be allowed to photograph. Getting a photo of the Youdan or Cromwell Cup would be useful as well (the later could be used in the SWFC history article as well). I've gone for good article status to see how it stands but they have a serious backlog and it will probably take a month or more. I'm thinking of withdrawing that and going for peer review instead.


 * I think Hillsborough would be slightly easier to bring up to FA standard. There is a ton of material needed for the history article. The main problem with the stadium article is a lack of references. The Priestfield Stadium would be a good template for what else needs adding. Getting an idea of the full timeline of stadium improvements would be a good addition as well.


 * I don't know if you have been following the discussion of our and SUFC's wikiprojects at WP:FOOTY but their existence is being questioned. My personal opinion is that they should be scrapped and replaced with a football taskforce at WP:Sheff. My reasoning is that their is already good communication between the editors of each club making individual projects somewhat redundent. A combined Sheffield footy taskforce would mean that the two sets of editors would be able to pool resources on pages with such as Steel City derby and Bramall Lane that hold interest to both sets of editors. It could also be used to premote articles that aren't directly related to the professional clubs. Obviously this could be seen as akin to suggesting a merger of the clubs but I think it would be of more benefit than the current system. josh (talk) 21:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The discussion is here. josh (talk) 22:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Please note that you breached WP:NPA on my talkpage. Desist. Sarah777 (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I fail to understand how you can view an established (friendly) warning template as a "personal attack". Please see my response on your talk page. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 23:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe you don't realise that in this context the phrase "(friendly) warning" is an oxymoron? Please stay away from my talk page. Now that is a warning! Sarah777 (talk) 23:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I see your harassment continues. Second time I ask you - stay off my talkpage. This is a warning. Sarah777 (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Harassment? That's rich coming from you! Don't worry, I have no intention of visiting your talk page again; please stay well clear of mine too. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 00:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

stop editwarring over article
Please stop reverting the article United Kingdom. If you disagree with a version of the article, take it to the talk page, even if it means leaving the the wrong version up. Please do not revert the article again, or you may be blocked for violating the three revert rule. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 14:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have taken the discussion to the talk page; it is the users who are reverting my edits that have refused to try to build consesus there before reverting edits, despite being invited to on several occasions, both by myself, other users and an admin... Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 14:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Do not defend a particular version of the article to me and then attempt to reinstate it. Instead, use the methods described at Dispute Resolution such as a request for comment or a Request for Third Opinion.  Neither of you appear to be taking any moral high ground on this issue, and should seek uninvolved editors to give a neutral opinion on the matter.  This should be done with the current version of the page in place, even though it is the wrong version.  This is not an endorsement of EITHER position in the matter, but rather a statement that the current practice of repeatedly reverting each other must be stopped.  This should be done REGARDLESS of who is "right".  Being "right" does not give you the privilege of acting poorly.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  16:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

My deepest apologies
It's obvious you're not a sockpuppet and, much more embarrasing for me, it's just as obvious that a more thorough check would have told me that in the first place. I honestly believed that to be the case when I made the report and made my first quick checks, but I should never ever have written such a report without making sure I knew how long you had been editing. This is by far my most embarrasing mistake ever on Wikipedia and I can only apologise for having wasted your time in that way. I have posted a message with the same content on the relevant page and removed the sockpuppet tag from your talk page. JdeJ (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Ipswich Town F.C.
I've restored Bowditch to the squad template as he was in the squad that travelled to Wednesday today, as listed here. His loan finished about a month ago I think, I recall reading it on the club site. Also, Andy Rhodes is still our goalkeeping coach. Not sure if he's on the books as a 3rd/4th keeper or not, that should probably be looked into. Just so you know why I've edited them two as I have. - JVG (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Was updating the squads on the 31st most of the day, somehow missed the fact Matt Richards had gone back out on loan when looking at the boiler. I'll try to keep an eye out for it though. Oh, and did a search on the official site and can't see Andy Rhodes listed as a player, only his son Jordan Rhodes (who got 6 goals for the reserves against the Dons last week :D). - JVG (talk) 00:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, whilst I'm at it, something you'll prob know better than I. just came from The Football League and it lists Sheffield Wednesday F.C. as joining in the late 19th Century. Were they not The Wednesday back then? I don't know when it changed. Man U is listed as Newton Heath, etc... Not sure if Bolton Wanderers should be "The Wanderers" too? - JVG (talk) 00:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Just searched within the wiki, Wanderers F.C. were a different entity and Bolton Wanderers changed to their current name from Christ Church F.C. or something a few years before The Football League formed so that one isn't an issue. - JVG (talk) 00:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sheffield Rules
Adding fact tags would be great help. Cheers, josh (talk) 01:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. That will keep me going for a while. josh (talk) 00:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Hillsborough
Had a look through the Wednesday Archives and the highest league attendance seems to be vs United in the 51/52 season. I can't find a definitive source for it though. I'm actually struggling to find any refs.

Thanks for your help on Sheffield Rules. I've refed most of it. The rule of thumb I've used is that a ref covers the rest of the paragraph unless I've used another source or it contains a subjective/bold statement. josh (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

DYK (February 11)
Hey, my DYK, New York State Route 368 was largely ignored and is now on the expired list without being checked. Any chance you can get it to the next DYK? Only one opposal for it also.Mitch32contribs 12:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Momoko Ueda
I did major editing to Momoko Ueda, added inline refs, and lengthened it. (In the process I discovered that a major part was a copyvio from one of its refs.) Was it okay that I removed the cleanup tag now? Sbowers3 (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I added an infobox (using tables from other LPGA golfers since there doesn't appear to be an infobox template) and removed the Personal section. I hope it's now good enough for DYK. Sbowers3 (talk) 22:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I found three more sentences. It's now 1689 characters by my count (excluding infobox, section headers, tables, and references). Sbowers3 (talk) 01:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Can you explain why you crossed out the DYK nom for Eneabba Stone Arrangement, claiming "already nominated"? Where was this other nom? Hesperian 05:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I guess you meant already accepted. Hesperian 05:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Port of Mainz
Hello - can you explain something to me: I recently nominated Port of Mainz as a DYK. Then today I come back and find that it has been placed on the main page and all, but that I missed it. Looked a pretty short period to miss it (I am usually on way to much for a 24 h period to simply slip through like that, but ok.

But then I check the nomination archive (where you commented on this) and not only did someone simply change my hook (from a hook talking about staple rights to one talking about the Roman port), I also get:


 * "Which is the intended article? Port of Mainz is used in another hook, which is presently at the end of February 12. Staple right isn't long enough. See #Suggestions for details. Art LaPella (talk) 07:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)"


 * "Port of Mainz has already been featured and Staple right is too short. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 17:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)"

Well, I see now that I forgot to bold the main entry - but why do you guys think there was another hook? I assume that someone else simply changed my hook and copied it in again??? Did it actually END up on the main page at all? I am quite confused Ingolfson (talk) 07:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Got it now. Someone else nominated me, while I was still finishing off the article before nominating it myself. How irritating. My hook was better, and I had planned that one for a few days. Ingolfson (talk) 07:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

WPSWFC
Hi. I'll see if I can get round to looking at some articles. The watchlist semi-automatic. I've created a page at WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday/watchlist. This is updated by running a script that fetches all the pages at Category:WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday articles and strips the Talk: part off. If it gets well used I may convert it into a bot. josh (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser
Feel free to begin using the AWB program as I you already seem to be added on the approved users list. Please don't hesitate to ask me any questions you have. Happy AWB'ing! &mdash; E  talk 09:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Your AWB edits
Hi, you seem to be going round inserting a newline above the Persondata section and below its header comment in football bios. As this is copy/pasted directly from WP:Persondata, presumably it's already formatted properly, and all your edit achieves on the article as displayed is to add an unnecessary line of whitespace above the categories box. Just wondering what the point was, really. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
Hiya. I notice you've been changing links to redirects on several articles in my watchlist. I did the same a while back and was alerted to this policy. I think it's alright to correct the redirects but more so while you're making other changes. Peanut4 (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Richard O'Donnell
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Richard O'Donnell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Richard O'Donnell. robwingfield «T•C» 09:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:SWFC
Thanks for the line on Wikiproject SWFC: Yes always glad to help out: checking the red link on SWFC Players was surprised to find no article for Rodger "Oscar" Wylde top scorer in 1976-77 I think. Have found some info for Rodger (been physio at Stockport since 1990 !!!!) so will work on that in the next few days. Regards Mick Knapton (talk) 12:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Rodger Wylde
It's been added to the next (slightly overdue) update. Daniel Case (talk) 22:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC).

My opinion is that the 200 character is a max. I think that adding the name of a stockport footballer does not add to the hook. but its only an opinion. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

You realise that you could now add the rest of the hooks? Victuallers (talk) 22:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Barry Butler
Cheers for sorting that out. --Dweller (talk) 16:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 19:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

List of professional sportspeople convicted of crimes
How about Kevin Phillips? He mugged you at the end there... sorry, couldn't resist. --Jameboy (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
That's minor as in minor edits btw., just in case it's ambiguous. --Jameboy (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You probably have them already but the SWFC club shop has two excellent reference books. One is a "Who's Who" of Sheffield Wednesday, the other is all about the history of Hillsborough. I was almost tempted to buy them myself but have too many books and programmes on my own team let alone anyone else's. I actually missed the goal as I was scared of missing the train, but did "hear" it outside the ground. --Jameboy (talk) 00:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * One is 100 Years at Hillsborough Can't remember exact title of other one, but if you phone the club shop I'm sure they'll tell you. --Jameboy (talk) 23:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, that wasn't it. It was something like a "Who's Who of Sheffield Wednesday", can't remember the exact title though. You might have to call the club shop to find out, as I can't find it on amazon, ebay or swfc.co.uk, sorry. --Jameboy (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Possibly. Difficult to say without an image of the front cover though, sorry. --Jameboy (talk) 18:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think that's it. --Jameboy (talk) 19:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Dan thanks for the DYK noms the other week, I appreciate it. I’ve just added the article Eric McMordie, he was not a full signing for Wednesday he just came on loan for two months but he was top scorer in the 1974-75 season. I don’t know whether you add the Wikiproject SWFC label in this situation. Hoping to expand the Jackie Robinson article in the near future. Regards Mick Knapton (talk) 19:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Sheffield Rules
Hi. My guess would be the total lack of interest in the FAC. I sorted out all the problems raised (they were mostly pretty simple ones) but then heard nothing back from the other editors. I'm going to put it back in at some point. I'm currently working on a bot that will automaticly generate tables of articles within projects belonging to certain categories. This could be used to create a table of articles under review. Hopefully this could provoke more interest in FACs. josh (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Laurie Burkinshaw
Hi, having seen you'd WPSWFC-tagged Mr Burkinshaw and added him to the project's articles list, I've done the same with Bob Gregg, assessed him as Low importance (37 league games) though obviously you can judge his importance to SWFC better than me. If I get any more I'll try and remember to do the same with them. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

List of Sheffield Wednesday F.C. staff
I proposed moving this to List of Sheffield Wednesday F.C. managers at the SWFC project but guess it slipped off the bottom of your watchlist before you got back online. I would like to get your opinion on it before I make the change. josh (talk) 14:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Hillsborough Kop.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Hillsborough Kop.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 21:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:South Stand.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:South Stand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 21:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:North stand.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:North stand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 22:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:West stand.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:West stand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 22:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 06:10, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Gilles de Bilde
Hi there DAN, VASCO here,

Maybe it was a false positive, but you reverted my HARD WORK on this Belgian footballer, i eventually made all my changes (all in the article's improvement, the existing reference was OUT OF PLACE and i inserted it correctly).

A nice week from PORTUGAL, VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 20:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I have partially reverted your edits as controversial statements such as "De Bilde's arrival on the pitch as a second half substitute brought instant cat calls from Wednesday fans and a serenade of "Gilles de Bilde, can he fix it? Gilles de Bilde, can he f*ck" to the tune of the theme of popular children's show Bob the Builder" should really be referenced. If a reference can't be provided then it will have to be removed. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 21:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Gilles de Bilde - PART 2
My fellow editor, DAN,

This is a major case for consulting EDIT HISTORY if there ever was one; that rubbish about "...Wednesday fans and a serenade of "Gilles de Bilde, can he fix it? Gilles de Bilde, can he f*ck" to the tune of the theme of popular children's show Bob the Builder." WAS NOT INSERTED BY ME!! It has been there since 14:54, 15 April 2007, inserted by user 88.109.34.134. This just in case you were implying i made those edits, i DID NOT. I do admit they need references added.

Good week again, from PORTUGAL, VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 23:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I did not claim that you added the statement; you did however remove the tag that stated that a reference was needed. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 07:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Gilles de Bilde - PART 3 (the end)
Hi there DAN,

glad we reached an understanding, i did not say you said i did the edits, but was in doubt about that.

I will try HARD to find a reference for that statement in the article, my friend, I GUARANTEE. Wikipedia is about team work, wouldn't you agree?

Wishing a pleasant week for the third time (smelling more like weekend now), from PORTUGAL,

VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Gilles de Bilde - PART 3 (addition)
Sorry man, just 1 more thing,

And about removing the tag, i can not remember now why i did it or if it was intentional or accidental. If it was the first reason, i apologize, should not have removed the thing.

BYE 4 NOW - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 14:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

George Wilson (English footballer)
I have created an article about George Wilson who was an England international and a Wednesday player. Are you able to add anything to the article? Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Ronnie Wallwork at Peer Review
You have previously contributed to the article Ronnie Wallwork, mainly in the context of his time at Sheffield Wednesday. I invite you to contribute to the article's peer review so that the article as a whole may be improved. Many thanks. Jameboy (talk) 23:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Walter Millership
Hiya Dan - Since 1888 does not list any wartime appearances at all for any player. The book The Wednesday Boys states he played in 155 wartime games scoring 12 goals, I'm surmising that these are all for Wednesday, theres no figures for Donny or United. The appearances in the lead paragraph are combined Bradford PA (30 league) and Wednesday (210 league) = 240 total league. I think thats right. BTW I've been working towards getting an article for all of Wednesday's 1935 FA Cup winning side. There is only Jack Surtees now missing which I'm working on. However I've just noticed he has an article under the wrong name, Jack Surtess (Surtees was manager of Darlington in 1942). So I will rename the article when I post Jack Surtees. Mick Knapton (talk) 20:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football (Auto-usersigning name time change)
Why did you change the time attached to my post as it was auto-set using the GMT setting to display the time, which was correct when I looked at my watch here in Dreamweaverjack (talk) 22:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It wasn't auto set as the time that you (obviously manually) entered was not in UTC (GMT), but was in BST, the current time zone in Scotland. I merely corrected it to standard Wikipedia time... Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 22:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It was in UTC, I agree now (once I realised my preferences (ie the page history) are not in UTC). The comment about moving other people's comments stays though, you should not do it. Rethreading is considered re-factoring and is frowned upon. Regards. Woody (talk) 23:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I apologize if I gave you the impression that I was trying to re-factor comments, that certainly was not my intention. I moved one comment to a position below the comment that it was replying to as Dreamweaverjack had already indented someone else's comment that was posted earlier to make it look like it was a reply to his new comment. It had all got really messy, and I believe that the move that I made clarified things. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 23:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Ooh Ta !
Hi Dan thanks for the Barnstar, thats nice. I can now amaze my workmates by naming the entire 1935 cup winning side without drawing breath. Also as I drive along Middlewood Road I can point out the former locations of Ronnie Starling's newsagents, Johnny Quinn's sports shop, Brian Joicey's car lot and Mark Hooper's sweet shop. We now have 453 players in the Category:Sheffield Wednesday F.C. players, would be nice to get up to 500 before too long - something to aim for. Regards Mick Knapton (talk) 15:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Sheffield Wednesday Wiki Project
Hi Dan, thanks for the welcome and the kind words - I'd be happy to join the Sheffield Wednesday Wiki Project - I think I could contribute to it quite a bit in places (not that the pages aren't excellent already!). I'm still getting used to Wiki, to be honest, but it'd be nice to join in and get to learn it doing something worthwhile! You may need to advise how I join the prject, however... Deejayone (talk) 07:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Page moves
I noticed you'd been doing some WP:DASH season page moves. While I heartily applaud your efforts, I can't help thinking it would save you a lot of effort if we got a bot to do it. I made an enquiry at User talk:Dycedarg, based on the fact that this user's bot had already successfully made similar page moves, but have yet to hear back. I'll let you know if I hear anything. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 21:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No probs. I've nominated Ronnie Wallwork for Good Article btw, so with a bit of luck the Wednesday WikiProject may have another GA soon. --Jameboy (talk) 22:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Not a problem at all, there's no point trying to expand a section if the guy only played a handful of games. Pity he left before one of your lot could grab a photo of him for the article! Thanks for your comments btw - I'm particularly proud of the references in Flemish - not many articles have that! :-) --Jameboy (talk) 22:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

1920–21 in English football is taking the Mick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs)

SWFC Wikiproject
Hi Dan thanks for the line on the Sources section and the individual seasons, good ideas and will try to help out. Sorry for the delay in answering we've been up to the Scottish Borders for a fortnights relaxation but will now continue with contributing to the project. Regards Mick Knapton (talk) 09:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Updated, can you do the credits? -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 23:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Dan, thanks for including Arthur De Wint Foote and Foote's Crossing Road at DYK. --Rosiestep (talk) 06:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * And another thank you for North Star Mine Powerhouse. (Yup, I'll drop a note at the promoters' talk pages, too.) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

will do
--Victuallers (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * it happens...thx for your patience and note Victuallers (talk) 14:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * bribery and corruption? ... fine (& thx) Victuallers (talk) 19:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Haha, a seven nom. :) I had so much research about Johnson and his biography was a popular topic. I limited myself only to those that were notable (the firsts of their type or ones that are heavily used). Otherwise, I think I could have gone for ten, lol. :) Anyway, thanks. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

My first dyk
Thanks, I noticed! It's had more edits (other than my ones) today than on all the other days put together! Thanks again, I'm thrilled with it! ;) --Cameron* 19:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Thank you for your contributions! - Mailer Diablo 19:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Academy
Just added a page about the Youth Academy; I'd appreciate any input. (Be gentle with me, it was my first attempt at an article!) Dharma-815 (talk) 20:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Sheffield Rules quality rating
Howdy. I noticed that you assigned an A-class rating to Sheffield Rules, yet I can find no evidence of the A-class review required for this rating to be achieved. I have therefore put the rating back to GA-class. If you can point me to the A-class review I'll happily restore the A-class rating, otherwise you may wish to set up an A-class review in order to achieve the rating. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, I'm not entirely sure if you would need one A-class assessment or three (i.e. one per wikiproject), but I have posed the question at Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No, A-class has been around a while. The James Milner A-class review for WPBiography was done in September 2007. I think you'd get support if you nominated it though, it looks a very good article. My suggestion would be to nominate for A-class review at one of the three wikiprojects covered by the article, then if successful (and if necessary - I'm still not sure) nominate at the other two. --Jameboy (talk) 20:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nah, leave it at A-class - I looked at the version history of the grading scheme and I think you may be right. Pushing it onwards and upwards to FA sounds like the perfect solution to me. :-) --Jameboy (talk) 21:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Footballer-unknown-status
Hi Dan1980 - the template listed above, which you have worked on, was taken to WP:SFD as being too similar to stub templates and therefore easily confused with them. General consensus was that it should be kept (and wasn't really within SFD's scope anyway), but should be reworked to look less like a stub template and more like other cleanup templates. I've done that - please feel free to tweak it further if you wish. Given its new appearance, I'd recommend it be placed at the top of the page along with other similar cleanup templates, not at the bottom with stub templates (I've said as much on a new /doc file I made for it. See Gradimir Crnogorac for an example of how it now looks in action. Cheers, Grutness...<small style="color:#008822;">wha?  00:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:SWFC 1970s.jpg)
You've uploaded File:SWFC 1970s.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:SWFC early-90s.jpg)
You've uploaded File:SWFC early-90s.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Dan1980! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Dave Richards -

Orphaned non-free media (File:Hillsborough disaster aftermath.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Hillsborough disaster aftermath.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of Adam Owen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Owen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adam Owen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 17:27, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sheffield FA crest.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sheffield FA crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)