User talk:DanAbnrml9

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. (Requestion 03:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC))


 * The external links in question are not inappropriate. They are directly contextually relevant to every page they have been added, and link to historical and/or photographic information of the direct subject matter in question. There is no product or service for sale, merely further information. That is how wikipedia external links are supposed to be used. DanAbnrml9 12:31, 26 April 2007)


 * We had a problem with labelscar.com link spam. For more information please see the WP:SPAM guideline. (Requestion 19:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC))


 * I have read the Wikipedia guidelines and still feel that the links are consistent with Wikipedia's external link guidelines. That said, I do not personally add links to any articles on Wikipedia any more nor have I for some time (and feel free to check my history to verify this). The intention was never to "spam," but merely to provide more directly relevant information to users who are searching on these topics. (DanAbnrml9 11:41, 27 April 2007)


 * I should add that, now that you have brought this to my attention, I promise that I will never make such an edit in the future. They were added before in good faith. (DanAbnrml9 12:46, 27 April 2007)


 * I looked at your edits and they seemed good faith but there were other accounts that added a lot of labelscar.com links. So it was bigger than the couple edits you made and it got rather complicated. I even had to run this by a senior spam fighter before I decided to act, and I rarely do that. I don't think you are a spammer but I did have to remove those labelscar.com links. Sorry for any hurt feelings. Thank you for understanding. (Requestion 17:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC))


 * As a show of good faith, I have removed all Labelscar external links or references created by those other than me (and there were quite a few), with the exception of AfD debates, talk pages, and pages from two images we authorized for use or were cited as the source of. I also left a comment on the talk page of the third-party user who added the most Labelscar links and requested they stop. I regret this situation and I hope it appeases you and the other editors, as I am truly sorry and do not wish to sully the reputation of my site. If there is anything else you would like me to do, please let me know. (DanAbnrml9 13:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC))


 * That was an incredibly noble thing that you just did. As a gesture of my appreciation I am going to strike out the warning that I left up above. Thanks again for understanding. (Requestion 21:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC))

Possibly unfree Image:Rhode-Island-Mall-09.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rhode-Island-Mall-09.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 02:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)