User talk:DanLitovPhD

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 07:23, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Anger
Hi,

This article is a GA article. I am open to the constructive changes but please discuss them one by one before adding them on the talk page. The current version of the article is sourced to the prestigious sources like Encyclopedia of Psychology, Oxford University Press. It is not our job to argue with academics. If you think there is another definition, we can mention them side by side. If there is an academic source that refutes the Encyclopedia of Psychology's definition, we can include that but we can not insert our own view points per WP:OR. I look forward discussing the matter with you on the talk page. I am going to sleep now but we can discuss it tomorrow. Thank you in advance. --Be happy!! (talk) 09:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Dear Dr. Dan Litov, I am sorry for reverting your changes. I didn't know that you are a professional. I, myself, am a beginner and so are many other editors. So, I usually revert changes that are not sourced (because most of the editors are not professional). My apologies. I can see that your edit is constructive in many ways but I would appreciate if we can mention them alongside the current definitions. Thank you very much! --Be happy!! (talk) 10:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. Could you please take a look at the current version of the article and let me know if it looks good. Thanks --Be happy!! (talk) 03:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Bipolar Disorder
Hi there, I saw the recent edit you made on this article and I felt the need to say something. Wikipedia is really not the right place to write something like that. Instead, it would be more appropriate to change the content of the article to accurately reflect what is written in DSM-V (I was going to do this in the future, but I'm working on another article at the moment) with proper in-text citations for verification of the added content. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions or comments on my talk page. Happy editing! TylerDurden8823 (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes agree. The DSM 5 is not that used yet. Many are hesitant. Also it has not changed that much from the DSM 4. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)