User talk:DanTD/Archive. October 2011

Re:User_talk:Bulwersator

 * [#bodyContent Re:User_talk:Bulwersator]

Thanks and sorry about this dumb mistakeBulwersator (talk) 16:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Please read the non-free content criteria again
Please give Non-free content criteria a thorough reading before you continue to comment on matters regarding non-free content. There seems to be a disconnect between the arguments that you have been making and the basic tenets of that policy, and I'd like for you to please refamiliarize yourself with what that policy says. For your arguments to carry weight in discussions, you need to make good, solid, policy-based arguments. Your arguments have not been up to this caliber.

If you disagree with what the policy says, you need to begin discussions to change the policy. If you get the changes you might want, great. Until then, however, the policy is as it is, and you need to make your arguments based on the existing policy. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The 97X Green Room for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The 97X Green Room is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The 97X Green Room until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 00:12, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Astoria Boulevard-Hoyt Avenue shelter.jpg
The was taken at Astoria Boulevard, not Astoria - Ditmars Boulevard. I frequently confuse those two stations because of their similar names. You can correct the description if you want. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 12:48, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Link for U
Database reports/Largely duplicative file names Anonymous IP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.71.126 (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC Oct 22
You are invited to Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and lectures that will be held on Saturday, October 22, 2011, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and here !--Pharos (talk) 04:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Drumheads
Apparently, you fail to understand the difference in which drumheads are going to Commons and which ones are being removed. Images that only consist of text and simple geometric shapes, such as that for City of Los Angeles, are considered ineligible for copyright on account of their being too simple (thus lacking sufficient originality), and therefore are in the public domain on account of that (see pd-text). In the case of City of San Francisco and others where they are being nominated for deletion, it is because of graphical elements in the image that go beyond simple shapes and text. For City of San Francisco, it is the right-side drumhead, which contains a graphical element. That is why it's being nominated for deletion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

I know you're working on US 27, but...
It's done! -- ‖ Ebyabe  talk -   Health and Welfare   ‖ 18:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Lost on Belmont (talk) 22:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)