User talk:Dan Atkinson

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Amren (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Bouvet Island
You've lost me... what the heck is "facility 3 of 6"?? It isn't explained in the TV series' article either. Frankly said, I believe this stuff belongs into the series' article, where readers maybe have a clue what this is all about. To me, it's just gobbledigook. Also, "currently, there is much speculation" is bad style. First, it'll be outdated pretty soon, so drop the "currently" and state when instead, and second, among whom, and third, who says so? Lupo 21:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


 * You wrote: "Hey, it's not my fault you don't watch season 2!" &mdash; I don't watch at all; I don't have a TV. That's certainly not your fault. But it is your fault if you write cryptic, only tangentially relevant stuff that only an insider can understand. Better write in such a way that even people who haven't seen that series can make some sense of it, and if you find that this means explaining quite a bit of the series, then over to the series' article it goes! Lupo 10:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

KC
Welcome to the Kindness Campaign! You're right, it does always help to be kind. I wonder if that could be written into Wikipedia Policy?

I cleaned up your userpage a bit. hope you don't mind. I was thinking of splitting your userboxes into two columns and putting 'Pic ot the Day' above or below them, but you had them organized so nicely that I didn't want to mess with them, so I just shortened the pic to POTD to get it out of the way of them. LambaJan 21:41, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Hurricane Delta and your RFD nomination
Greetings.

I was closing out the latest batch of closeable RFD nominations when I ran across your nomination for Hurricane Delta.

Please note that if you wish to turn an existing redirect into a fully fleshed-out article, you are welcome to do so. No admin action is required. Just edit the redirect and transform it into an article, and there you are.

All the best. Ξxtreme Unction |yakkity yak 15:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Hi Dan,

I've blocked the two you listed. When using the vandal template you don't need to put the angle brackets in, in fact putting them in generates the wrong output, so you should have been using something like. Thanks --pgk( talk ) 12:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes. I realised after I did it (and subsequently fixed it! Thanks for putting the blocks on! --Dan Atkinson 12:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

You warned me because... ?
I just got a note from you, What edit of mine did you revert? I've been on #wikipedia-en-vandalism all morning... feel free to delte the warning and my reply on my talk page if you feel it's wrong. 65.13.3.52 16:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Warning was given incorrectly to the wrong person. Please accept my apologies. --Dan (Talk) 16:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's ok, I was having a laugh at it... On the chan I was comparing an account full of rv's to karma whoring =D 65.13.3.52 16:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

HL2 Aftermath
Some people do get it when I asked them to refer to the article and learn something they probably don't know a great deal about, yet some people just revert without explaination. I probably shouldn't have used that kind of language but having such "noobs" who would rather not spend the time learning really annoys me. BlueShirts 00:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Looking for articles to work on?
Hello, Dan Atkinson. I'm SuggestBot, a Wikipedia bot that helps new members contribute to Wikipedia. You might like to edit these articles I picked for you based on things you've edited in the past. Check it out -- I hope you find it useful. -- SuggestBot 15:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Edit to my user page
No it was perfectly fine thanks it is a wiki after all and I don't own the page (though of course like most other users I would revert vandalism of it), constructive edits are good :) thanks a lot it doesn't look half as messy now. -- Mistress Selina Kyle  (  Α⇔Ω ¦  ⇒✉  )  23:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Project
Hi, my name is Federico (alias Pain) and I am creating a section for nominating th best user page, I was wondering if you were interested in joining the project.

The project has just started, and we need help to spread the word and ameliorate it.

Votes_for_best_User_page

Best regards, Federico Pistono  ✆   ✍  16:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

The Language of God
Does God speak English? Does God speak, even? At most, I always thought God was that still, small voice within (which isn't exactly speaking, of course, although that isn't to say one doesn't hear it all that same; oddly God on that theory I suppose sounds a lot like me to me). I guess that means you speak English as well as I do then. I don't suppose burning bushes speak either. I know the Hebrew Bible has God chattering away with Abraham and Sarah, and lots of laughing besides, in between directions to kill children on mountain tops, but that always struck me as unlikey. And very un-English (and perhaps un-Anglophone). Blondlieut 22:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

You say that speak English in a God-like way. Your words, not mine. Hence I ask. It's your user-box, not mine. It's an odd thing, comparing one's self to something that doesn't exist. Blondlieut 18:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Venezuela
Good day.

I'm looking forward to create the WikiProject Venezuela. I had the idea of creating it when I first made the portal. The project will have the main objective of centrating efforts into a more complete information and a higher quality of the articles in Wikipedia, other media in the sister projects, and the portal itself.

However, the rules say that I should have at least five to ten members willing to integrate and contribute to the wikiproject. So if some of you guys want to join in, then leave me a message, or in this page. I will be back in a few days to see how things are going on.

The motif of my adress is to invite you to join into the list o interested in order to improve the qualiy standars of articles relating to Venezuela and its history, subdivisions, culture, etc. If you are interested, go toWikiproject/List_of_proposed_projects and list yourself.

Thanks.

--Alex Coiro 22:09, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Football Manager Article Edit
I moved www.sortitoutsi.net to the top of the page because it is quite frankly the best website for the game with the most downloads and what not. I consider myself neutral with all of the different fansites and find that it is the best English language one. I was not "bumping" it to get more hits or whatever. If I go to a page about a game on Wikipedia and look at links to fansites the first site that I visit is usually at the top of the list, generally the best site would be at the top of the list and so it would be logical in my view that www.sortitoutsi.net should be top of the list.

Hope you understand that and my edit and if you don't mind I will change it back. Thanks, JJ

Edit to Hypnofetishism
Regarding your edit to hypnofetishism, you wound up deleting nearly half the article. I assumed that your intention was to redact external links to commercial websites to prevent self-promotion, and that the end result was merely a mistake in editing. I'm not taking a position on what I presumed to be your intention one way or the other. Nevertheless, I reverted the article and started a topic on the article's discussion page regarding the issue. Some of the external links deserve keeping, while others may not. Tommythegun 13:29 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Hi, thank you for your interest in VandalProof and Congratulations! You are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already simply download VandalProof from our main page, install and you're ready to go!

If you have any problems please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Once again congrats and welcome to our team! - Gl e n   TC (Stollery)  23:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available
 After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Glad to meet you to
Who made you the judge of worthy edits!? Sorry king dan, for offending you regal absolute authority of the FM2006 article. I added it in my infinite stupidity as in my ignorance of your authoritarian powers, thought it served as a useful note to anyone who clicks the link and wonders why the fuck its not working. Whats the point in adding injuries to wikipedia if people will just get better, whats the point of adding buildings to wikipedia if they'll just get knocked down, whats the point of adding smart alicky comments to my talk page, when all thats going to happen is I'll think you are obnoxius and inconsiderate. Hacking is a bit more serious than server overloads to be honest. So if you have something stupid and poorly thought through to say, keep it to your edit summaries, I don't need to hear it. Thank you in advance for not speaking to me again. Philc TECI 18:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Empire Direct, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TableManners 14:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Football Manager ad.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Football Manager ad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User WebDev
A tag has been placed on Template:User WebDev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ubiquity-screenshot.PNG}
Thank you for uploading Image:Ubiquity-screenshot.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Citation_needed
the xkcd comic at WP:Citation needed is under attack again ... Your thoughts would be welcome. Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 17:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:FM-2007-Feeder-Reaction.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:FM-2007-Feeder-Reaction.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

York meetup
Hi Dan Atkinson. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Primadonna (Marina and the Diamonds song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raison d'etre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slough Trading Estate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page O2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks, resolved. --Dan Atkinson (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Leeds meetup
Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi there! I'm not sure if you're watching this page, but I'm unable to meet this weekend, but I would have loved to since I've never been to a Wiki meetup before! --Dan Atkinson (talk) 18:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * No problem Dan, I can invite you to future wikimedia meet ups if you like? Alternatively if you click on your watchlist at the top right, at the top of the watchlist page it shows all up coming wiki meet ups in the UK. Regards IJA (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * That's great. I didn't know about that little feature! Thanks! --Dan Atkinson (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  04:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Empire Direct


A tag has been placed on Empire Direct, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Dan Atkinson! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)