User talk:Dan Bartz

Welcome!
Hello, Dan Bartz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 07:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Census of Quirinius. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Egsan Bacon (talk) 02:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -Alabama- (talk) 02:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism? That’s a stretch. I simply stated the drawing was not proof and should not be submitted. But perhaps you fear hurting the feelings of religious people. Dan Bartz (talk) 02:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Ridiculous. You added personal commentary to the article. That's a fact and was inappropriate. And you're confused - an encyclopedia is not a "forum". Nothing to do at all with religion. Doug Weller  talk 07:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)