User talk:DanaGhouse

Welcome!
Hello, DanaGhouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Dana! Wanted to test this out here! ^_^ Rosie Dragon (talk) 01:53, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, Rosie! Testing this to see if it sends you a notification. DanaGhouse (talk) 11:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This is really cool and I am really late. ^_^ Rosie Dragon (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all your hard work,

Week 8 Peer Review
Thank you for writing such an interesting article on Renee Watson! I’d heard of a few of her titles but didn’t know anything about her life so this was a fascinating read. Following the wiki guidelines I had a few, hopefully, helpful suggestions for the final draft of your article! Please feel free to respond if anything is unclear.

I love that you included a picture! I haven’t quite figured out how to do that yet with my article but you’ve inspired me to try. I think it’s great to have an image in the article, especially since the article discusses a living person. I think your lead section could be improved by adding a few more sentences. A large focus of the article is Watson’s work in activism, particularly, the I,Too, Arts Collective, so I believe this should be mentioned at the start.

Your elaboration of the article is great. In some areas, like the “Personal life” section, I think varying sentence structure would improve the general flow of the article. Right now, it feels kind of staccato like “she did…” and “then she did…”

I think the most important adjustment for the article, though, is a reorganization of sections. Overall, there isn’t a chronological flow to Watson’s life reflected in the article. I don’t think you need to add anything but I think moving sentences and sections around would be helpful. For example, Waton’s “Personal life” section ends with her moving to New York in 2005 but then the next section, “Education,” picks up with her elementary, middle, and high school years. I would collapse these two sections by fitting in those school names where relevant in her personal timeline. I think that would provide a better shift from her personal, formative years to her more public, career years. After this “Personal life” section, I would create a heading for “Career” with subheadings for “Teaching,” “Performing,” and “Writing.” I think this would provide a clearer understanding of her life for the reader. Similarly, I would move the section, “I,Too, Arts Collective” up to before the section on “Selected works.” It’s a fascinating part of her life and I feel like it’s buried at the bottom of the page.

I would also recommend expanding her “Performing” section to elaborate on what “Roses are Red Women are Blue” is. I don’t know if this was a one woman show or a play or a performance of poetry. If it’s not a significant section, maybe consider collapsing it into the general section of her “Career.”

Lastly, I would consider reworking the section “Activism.” From my perspective, the first few sentences, in particular, are reading more like opinion than the neutral content Wikipedia strives for. I’m not sure if my opinion is based in a lack of citation for those sentences or word choice or both. The current tone seems rather leading. Is there an interview or article that you could pull from that could be cited?

Thank you! Cry598a (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your feedback! We followed a lot of suggestions in our continued edits, including adding the I, Too, Arts Collective to the lead and combining small sections as you suggested. You were spot on with some of our own thoughts. Thanks!