User talk:DanaWright

Welcome!
Hello, DanaWright, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 00:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Redirection
Remove Kebab Srebrenica nice redirection :D:D:D:DD:D --ThecentreCZ (talk) 00:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Remove kebab listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Remove kebab. Since you had some involvement with the Remove kebab redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  ~barakokula31  (talk)  18:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Toyota Camry (XV10), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Carmaker1 (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Camry XV10
You obviously have no idea of how Toyota had already started development of this platform and generation in 1986. It is very clear you do not know what you are talking about and are taking it upon yourself to introduce/alter information in the article that contradicts reality. Judging by your silly edit summary, it is also clear that you do NOT realize how long vehicle development takes nor do you realize that in early 1988, the V30 design had already reached approval, intended for release in early 1991 for export markets. That is what was shown to Toyota USA personnel. Figure these things out, before trying tamper with properly sourced and edited information contributed by other users. Otherwise, I will take it up with the necessary authoritative Wiki bodies, to ensure that your disruptive editing is curtailed and I do not have to be frequently cleaning up such messes. Don't waste my time with this and make better use of yours.--Carmaker1 (talk) 22:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, what condescending things to say about changing one year! The Automotive News reference you provided clearly implies the XV10 was conceived in 1989, and presumably early in the year based on what's said in The New York Times reference about the V30. Unless you can provide concrete evidence like patent approvals, you can't go on assumptions about production cycles. Also, I don't appreciate you impersonating an "authoritative Wiki body" with your thread above. Cheers! DanaWright (talk) 06:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)