User talk:Danado0ona

Semi-protect. vandalism. Danado0ona (talk) 09:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * }

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Suzan Bushnaq do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Suzan-Bushnaq-Womens-Voice/200412696492?ref=ts. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikicommons
Hi Danado0ona, there are some urgent questions waiting on your talkpage on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of Suzan_Bushnaq

 * Dear Danado0ona, Hi I notice you have been putting lots of stuff back on the Suzan Bushnaq page. I don't know if you read through the last deletion debate Articles_for_deletion/Suzan_Bushnaq. I tried hard to rescue the article from deletion and make it into one that was accpetable and it scrapped through via a no consensus not a keep. My suspicion is that if it goes again for deletion in this form then it might be viewed as being massively over promotional - more like a personal website than an encyclopedia article. What do you think? I think it might be best to go back to the short version that survived and then try to add a things back in stages with proper referencing. Best wishes (10:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)) (Msrasnw (talk) 10:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC))
 * Dear Danado0ona, I have restored the briefer version. I have done this because I think it is highly likely that if we left the other version up - it would get flagged for deletion and it might be difficult to save it again. It might be possible that you would want to get this information that I have removed on a private website or an official site for Suzan_Bushnaq and then this page could link to that - but it shouldn't be facebook or some other such place but a proper cite that was in some senses reliable. Obviously you are free to restore your version here if you are really confident about it but I honestly think it might be better to discuss things first. I think current short version is better than having no page which I think might be the alternative. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC))

Your other account (a case sensitivity error?)
Dear DanadoOona, there are also some unanswered messages here for you here I think: User talk:DanaDo0ona. It is best to have just one account to ease communication and I guess you had overlooked case sensitivity. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC))