User talk:Dandan1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- S iva1979 Talk to me  06:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Attack Warning
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Hatch68 22:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance


The article Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Possibly copy-pasted, otherwise it's original research where the references listed don't support the subject matter but just provide links to terms mentioned in the text. No other WP:RS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I have also tagged User:Dandan1/Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance for speedy deletion, as it appears to contain the same content. Cnilep (talk) 21:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IT Security Micro Governance
A tag has been placed on IT Security Micro Governance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cnilep (talk) 21:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with User:Dandan1/erecompanyroughdraft
Hello. Concerning your contribution, User:Dandan1/erecompanyroughdraft, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, User:Dandan1/erecompanyroughdraft appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. User:Dandan1/erecompanyroughdraft has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. DES (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Your addition to User:Dandan1/erecompanyroughdraft has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DES (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You seem to have made multiple copies of the content of the web pages at http://ere-security.com/blog/quantifying-risk-and-cost-of-it-security-compliance-part-1 and http://ere-security.com/blog/quantifying-risk-and-cost-of-it-security-compliance-part-2 which issimply not acceptable. Please read our copyright policy. DES (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * In general, it is a poor idea to edit solely to change text from one acceptable spelling to a varient acceptable spelling of the same word, as you did in this edit, changing "organised" to "organized". See Manual of Style and Manual of Style. DES (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance
A tag has been placed on Quantifying Risk and Cost of IT Security Compliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IT Security Micro Governance
A tag has been placed on IT Security Micro Governance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Exhibit4.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Exhibit4.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Cnilep (talk) 16:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Exhibit3.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Exhibit3.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Cnilep (talk) 16:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Potvspro.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Potvspro.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Cnilep (talk) 16:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Exhibit5.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Exhibit5.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Cnilep (talk) 16:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Exhibit3.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Exhibit3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Cnilep (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

IT articles
Apart from the copyright issues, the problem is that these are original essays and not appropriate for Wikipedia. Please see WP:NOR and WP:NOT. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Wikibooks seems most likely, possibly also Wikisource. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)