User talk:Dandandandandandan

January 2013
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Angelica Wallén, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Angelica Wallén. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Angelica Wallén was changed by Dandandandandandan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957569 on 2013-01-22T19:19:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Angelica Wallén with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 19:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)