User talk:DaneBelroseDane

Welcome!
Hello, DaneBelroseDane, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Shaun 15:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Inverted commas
...are not necessary for a band or musician's name. I also have secere doubts about the notability of both the artists you have written articles on; I would recommend improving the refs. Oh, and adding some actual content never hurts.TheLongTone (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * dear TheLongTone hello thanks for your message. Please can you tell me which pages you are talking about because I have been making a lot of new edits today. I am new to this so I am still learning, but am glad to get your help. Thanks DaneBelroseDane (talk) 16:17, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Can't remember, you'll have to check what you've been doing yourself.TheLongTone (talk) 16:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of "Peter & The Magician"


A tag has been placed on "Peter & The Magician" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ComplexRational (talk) 16:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of "Moonlight Matters"
Hello, DaneBelroseDane,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username OxonAlex and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, "Moonlight Matters", for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click   button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Oxon Alex   - talk  16:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello [User talk:OxonAlex| - talk ]] thanks for leaving a message for me explaining the deletion. Yes I understand that it meets the relevant criterion. I had thought I create the page and then add content with the sources later but perhaps that isn't the best way to do it so sorry about that. I'm new here so am learning. Thanks for your offer to help too, it was very nice as the other person who came to my page wasn't very helpful. I can see the page has been deleted. Shall I carry on with my plan to add content to it or do you think I should leave this page? I think the artist is a significant artist and he is signed to Kitsune. But will I will look at the claim of significance page you sent and try to work it out from there. Thanks for your help again. I'm grateful. It's nice to meet you too. DaneBelroseDane (talk) 17:13, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deadbots


The article Deadbots has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't look notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Smjg (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Articles
Hello Dane and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed you created a few short new articles which have been nominated for deletion, so I just wanted to reach out with a few recommendations. An almost foolproof way of creating new articles is: You can start drafts in your own userspace, for example under the title User:DaneBelroseDane/Shindu and work on them there until it's ready. Articles are reviewed fairly quickly after they've entered the article space, so if the article doesn't explain why the subject is notable when it is created it is likely to be deleted.
 * 1) To explain why the subject is notable (the article Shindu just mentions the band exists, but nothing more). See also our notability guidelines for musicians for things that would demonstrate notability
 * 2) To cite at least 3 reliable, independant sources which show significant coverage of the subject, and to summarize what those reliable sources have said

Replying to your question above, I can only find coverage of Moonlight Matters in what appear to be self-published sources, so it probably wouldn't survive a deletion discussion. You are still free to remove the proposed deletion tag, but I'd recommend only doing that if it's possible to expand the article with reliable sources.

Feel free to ping me if you want a second opinion on a draft or something, you can also come ask questions at the Teahouse.

See you around, – Thjarkur (talk) 00:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC) Thanks a lot for the information. Yes that makes sense. I was going to make the articles more beefed out, but it does make sense to do that on my own page first, so yes that all makes sense. Sorry if I have caused extra work. Sorry about that. DaneBelroseDane (talk) 11:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shindu


A tag has been placed on Shindu, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 13:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello DaneBelroseDane. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DaneBelroseDane. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 11:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * hello there. I forgot the password to my account so am only replying to this now. I am not being paid for editing wikipedia at all. I am just doing this for my own interest in getting facts out there. I don't know why you think I am being paid. I wish I was! 😂 but sadly not.

DaneBelroseDane (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC) GSS please can you tell me if I can go on and make edits again. Also if you can say what it was about my edits that looked like was was getting paid. DaneBelroseDane (talk) 22:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)