User talk:Danflies

Baca seems a worthy subject for an article, but if you would like the article to remain you must write it in the WP style, which includes:

looking like an encyclopedia article not a CV

saying in the first sentence something to demonstrate notability, like professor of X at, winner of the XYZ prize and N honorary doctorate (whatever applies). Use the exact word: "notable"; do not use "famous" not going into disproportionate personal details listing college degrees with university and year -- and putting the university names in double brackets listing important awards listing important memberships and offices held listing books published as formal references style: Author, title, Publisher, year ISBN if possible. listing some major published papers, say how many. and, most important, giving some 3rd party sources. A website at a university etc. can be one, but it cannot be the only one. Book reviews are fine, or a newspaper stories. Print or web is OK, but not from a list or a blog.

There is serious prejudice here against articles written by the subject or a member of his family, so it has to be a really solid article. See WP:AUTO and WP:COI These is unfortunately, prejudice against people from the academic world. Look at similar articles.

If you do not do this immediately, the article will probably be deleted in a day or two--though not by me. I apologize for not having the time to help you personally.

details 1. Birthdate and place 2. Degrees and where they're from 3. Honours we've got. 4. Previous major positions 5. Publications we've got. 6. There must be third party mentions. We need book reviews or news items -- there obviously will be some reviews, and there should be news items about his programs or talks. If you cant find the reviews get some help from a librarian and put them in, tomorrow. as References 7. external References: at the bottom, we need his web page at the University, any other official university page DGG 23:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I put a hangon tag on you behaf so you will have at least a few hours,

Your submission at Articles for creation: Racing Point F1 Team (March 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Racing Point F1 Team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Racing Point F1 Team, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Racing_Point_F1_Team Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legacypac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Racing_Point_F1_Team reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 05:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)