User talk:Danger101010

Deletion of 'The Sinister Forest'
Hello Fang Aili, I am writing concerning an article you recently deleted, 'The Sinister Forest'. Unfortunately when i began to composed the article i did not have time to finish it in one sitting, therefore the article did not properly outline why the music group is notable. However, if you would restore the article i will be able to finish writing it properly, perhaps then you can re-asses the notability of the music group. (The reason why me and many other Australians, or members of the post modern philosophy, believe the band to be notable is that it is the first ever, and most prominent group, of a rapidly growing and now quite large, avant garde musical movement) I have had multiple requests to write a Wikipedia article as i have just written a section about the group in soon to be published book about the 'war on modernism'. (The book is called 'Post-Modern Warriors', was written predominately by Professor Richard Brennan, and is due to be released late October through The Sydney University) I think, when properly written, this article will be an important source of information on a group which appears minimally on the internet, but is very influential on Post-Modern music. Also, if you have any spare time i have had difficulty referencing the article as i am partially computer illiterate, (a problem of my generation) so any help would be greatly appreciated. p.s. thankyou for the zen moment Regards, Dr. Daniel Hill (Danger 101010, hahaha!) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Danger101010 (talk • contribs) 04:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC).


 * Done. See WP:CITE for help on citing sources. But as a shortcut, you can use . Let me know if you have any more questions. I'll keep an eye on the article and help if I can. Cheers, and thanks for contributing! --Fang Aili talk 15:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sinister_forest_album_cover.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sinister_forest_album_cover.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)