User talk:Dangerous-Boy/Archive 6

dont leave
Wikipedia needs people like you. Remeber a time when there was no content on Hinduism in Indonesia, Gedong Bagus Oka and Parisada Hindu Dharma ? Remember a time when Category:Hindu politicians was a small struggling cat? Remember a time when Category:Hindu monarchs had no members, its thanks to us that these cats and these areas are encyclopedic now, and will continue to be down the road. Baka man  15:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

indonesia
We should start working on the Indonesian articles again. Tokoh Indonesia is a good resource. See id:Pengguna:Tokohbaka. The good part is that Sanskrit derived words are ok in Indonesian, making it easy for us to contribute, and its in Latin script. Mostly I add Category:Tokoh Hindu to pages. Baka man  21:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I have something for you!


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Trampton 00:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Rwsage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwsage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Hindutva propaganda
What is your opinion on this, it's a phenomenon ripping Wikipedia apart from the seams, with fanatical supporters of Swami Vivekananda and his RSS revising history to make people believe lies. Think of all the children that enter Wikipedia and see this revisionist history and will need deprogramming in the future. I commend our maintsream admins. I support the neutrality and common non-OR sense of our admins. By the way, did you know that Swami Vivekananda himself used to write propaganda and publish it in Voice of India. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.178.139.138 (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

Christianity in Myanmar
A content dispute is not vandalism. Grow up. Chris 21:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

National stubs
Hi there,

Just a small suggestion: When you stubsort (such as you did in the article Hinduism in Tanzania), please include the national stub (Tanzania-stub in this case). Good work otherwise. Thanks--Thomas.macmillan 03:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Religious Articles
You've tagged a lot of religious articles, particularly, but not limited to Catholic articles, for lack of notability. Some of these might have been taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia. What do you expect for reference material? Explanation of religious organization is fairly basic to society. The articles could be much better referenced, I suppose. Do you have a good example someplace of what you are looking for?

For example, you have tagged the first Catholic diocese in the US, Baltimore, for lacking notability. Are you just tagging American dioceses? I am interested in your thoughts here. Are you looking for lots of footnotes? External references? Student7 20:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. The Jesus Christ article can have and has some "meat" in it, which banal organizations and towns and such, can't and shouldn't. There is no intellectuality to it. Not much to reference. Would church pubs be acceptable? I've done about all I can for online references to the sparse writeup on the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orlando. Removed some stuff I got out of a newspaper but failed to footnote. Student7 00:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Goa Inquisition
Please read the talk page. I have mentioned the reason for removing the section.--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

blocked
You have been blocked for meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry - please see this ANI report. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 02:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * odd considering I've had my account longer than the allegded banned user and have not used it for the same articles.--D-Boy 18:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * did you even bother to look at my edit history?--D-Boy 19:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * We've found out about Jesussucks D-Boy, give up. Your good contributions don't balance out your covert trolling activities with Hkelkar and the others. The only way someone will unblock you is if you provide evidence that you are not a meatpuppet of Hkelkar. Otherwise, the admins will continue to decline your requests and someone will protect this page. GizzaChat  &#169; 01:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Trolling? you can see my edits for yourself.  I've never used sock or meat puppets.  you can check my ips.  there is no evidence to give considering I have not been shown any.  Also, I hear you are behind this witchhunt.   shouldn't you be taking a break of some sort instead of harassing me?  I've never shared any of my account with anyone.  The most you can accuse me of is maybe on some stuff with baka and that I do by checking his contribution list.  When you warned on civility, I left and started no trouble.  this unblock is unreasonable for a first time block, not transparent, and goes against wiki policy and mostly everything wiki stands for.  even the paks were notified when they were blocked the first time.  Also, you're not that innocent yourself.  you were involved with some us.  you should do the right thing and give up your admin rights.--D-Boy 05:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * So some evidence would be nice....--D-Boy 17:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

RfAR
A request for arbitration has been filed concerning you. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 21:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


 * That's great except for the simple fact that I CAN'T POST there since you blocked me for no reason! --D-Boy 21:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Your arbitration statement
Thank you for posting your statement on Requests for arbitration. However, your references to violation of the First Amendment (which does not apply to Wikipedia, a private entity) and to notifying the Maryland State Attorney could be considered to violation the letter or spirit of WP:LEGAL, an important policy. Please revise your statement promptly to remove these. Thank you. Newyorkbrad 23:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Reblocked
You were unblocked only to participate in the arbitration case naming you. As you have returned to an article you previously edit-warred on you have been reblocked. If an arbitration case is openend, you may post evidence here and it will be copied to the case by an arbitrator or clerk. Thatcher131 18:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * whatever.--D-Boy 18:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Let it be known that I was not advised of any restriction on my editing at the time of his original block. If the intention was or is that I can edit only the case pages then I should have been clearly notified of this.--D-Boy 18:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You're correct. I don't see that Rama's Arrow imposed any restrictions when he unblocked you.  I take no position on the allegations, so I am not prepared at this time to own your block myself, so I am unblocking you. Thatcher131 18:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Your comments
w.r.t your comments on AMbroodEY's talk page. I am fully aware that you are the creator of the article and that it shines in the list of articles you created.

Don't make cheeky comments such as these :''Think about it. What would jesus do in your situation?'' You are deliberately trying to communalise what is a question of facts and biases.

Request you to chill out too. Practice what you preach! You and Baka reverted my removal of the Massacre of Muslims section even though you knew it shouldnt be there and provided a strange reason "referenced sources"? How does a referenced event from 1510 be included in an event that started in 1554? As for calling Xandar a fanatic I will tell you what I told Amey : "Before you clear the dirt from your brother's eye, clear the dirt form your own eye". --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't understand what you mean by the link your provided. I know you are in a particulalry tight situation, but that is your own creation. Again No!--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 08:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * before that you own me an explanation as to what you intended by the link you provided. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 09:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Change
It's change. You have to live with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs)
 * 21 December 2005
 * 31 December 2006

Hi
Greetings from Bhadani. Please understand that if one is innocent nothing is going to happen except some stress. I request you to face the situation with a sense of optimism and please co-operate. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. --Bhadani (talk) 15:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2
Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 02:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Please also note the arbitrators' comments here regarding scheduling matters. Newyorkbrad 02:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Freedom skies
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.


 * Freedom skies is placed on standard revert parole for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism. Further, he is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page.
 * Freedom skies shall select one account and use only that account. Any other account used may be indefinitely banned. Pending selection of an account Freedom skies may not edit Wikipedia.
 * Violations of paroles and probations imposed on parties of this case shall be enforced by blocks for an appropriate period of time. Blocks and bans are to be logged at Requests for arbitration/Freedom skies.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 18:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello

 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bhadani&diff=prev&oldid=128164402
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bhadani&diff=next&oldid=128164402
 * This is really interesting!}. More interesting is the fact that immediately after this post by me - I faced this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bhadani&diff=127485235&oldid=127484652 which was deleted by someone. I undeleted it to see the attack on me and copied the attack. No new editor will watch my page so closely! Certainly, some editors are there who are there to poison wikipedia. --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani] (talk) 14:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I will explain it briefly - any of the administrator may indefinitely block me if he/ she wishes to do so, and I shall be required to waste my time to get the block lifted while that administrator and his friends here shall have the last laugh! I do not want to be part of a system (wikipedia) which is so fragile and is culpable to such misuse by an administrator. I had understood this reality during my first year of life here, and you will find that after that most of my edits have been cosmetic in nature! --Bhadani (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Kichak
Hi, I saw that you added the sanskrit spelling of Kichak as  instead of . I can not figure out how to transliterate into sanskrit, so would you please correct that? Thanks. - TwoOars ( T 19:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Kichak
Hi, in the Kichak article the sanskrit spells  instead of . I could not figure out how to transliterate into sanskrit. Would you please change it? I dropped a note to User:Dangerous-Boy but later realized that he's on a wikibreak. Thanks. - TwoOars ( T 19:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If I edit any page, some one may indefintely block me as the User:Dangerous-Boy was blocked. I am afraid to edit wikipedia. Please request some other editor. Thanks for your message. --Bhadani (talk) 19:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

your comments
Most of your comments are unsuccesfull attempts at trying to armtiwist others or plainley useless comments which do not add to Wikipeida's improvement. Stop it and get around to doing something constructive. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 08:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Thanks. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 08:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Darkon.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Darkon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Carmillared.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Carmillared.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bladetek.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bladetek.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Axechar.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Axechar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

your message
DaGizza knows what Wikipedia is about and why he's here. Too bad you don't, and prolly never will. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 03:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks like dboy has been a bad boy. He doesn't get some shiny lines of code. Baka man  03:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks like. I'm totally upset now.--D-Boy 03:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Whenever met with the prospect of talking to either one of you, I'm always asked the question - Kya Bhaise Ko Bhagavad Padhte Hain? Too bad I haven't ever given the correct answer - up till now. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy)  03:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * here's a quote from Doc on RA's talk page, DAgizza. Please, don't be a dick.--D-Boy 23:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * No rama is correct. I'm culturally Hindu, not religious. I dont worship cows (or buffalo), Rama's Arrow. Baka man  03:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tb2blade.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2blade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 09:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tb2dead.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2dead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 09:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

No content in Category:Samurai Shodown characters
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Samurai Shodown characters, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Samurai Shodown characters has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Samurai Shodown characters, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Samurai Shodown characters itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment
Regarding your recent rant in an RFARB, I'm appalled. I request you to apologize and retract that rant. I don't recall any recent disagreements with you over any issues. If you have specific disagreements against some other admins, please pursue appropriate mediation procedures, rather than issuing a huge rant to a seemingly random list of editors. Thank you. --Ragib 01:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What conversation I had, or had not with RA over email is irrelevant. Your own diff shows that RA said I had agreed with him in principle about some incident. So? I had been extremely busy over last two months, and have curtailed my Wikipedia activities to a great extent. I haven't even commented in the RFA. Civility is a virtue we should all maintain in Wikipedia, and your rant was definitely out of the line.


 * If you can, please provide a diff to any comment, edit, or something else *by* me that shows I have acted in bad faith against you or anyone else in the RFA (both parties). Otherwise, your accusation rant only shows the absurdity of the whole rant you put there. Thank you. --Ragib 05:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Then conversations Dboy "had with hkelkar" are irrelevant as well as are the conversations "Ambroodey had with Nick" are irrelevant as well. So dboy, Ragib does not agree with Rama's arrow then, as he doesnt believe off-wiki cabalism is a no-no. Baka man  02:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Capcal.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Capcal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Landtime.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Landtime.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lodoss.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lodoss.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Teksp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Teksp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tekka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tekka.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tekcd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tekcd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tb2yumi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2yumi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tb2ost4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2ost4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tb2ost3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2ost3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tb2ost2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2ost2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tb2ost1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2ost1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tb2honda.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2honda.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tb2dvd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2dvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tb2david.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tb2david.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Petshopofhorrors.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Petshopofhorrors.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rwkyra.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwkyra.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rwkento.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwkento.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rwdais.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwdais.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rwcale.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwcale.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rwanubis.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwanubis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rwancient.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwancient.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rwcye.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rwcye.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Shicover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Shicover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Zoeidolo.jpg
I have tagged Image:Zoeidolo.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Zoedol.jpg
I have tagged Image:Zoedol.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vhdvd.jpg
I have tagged Image:Vhdvd.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 19:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Hi. Please have a look at Indomitable Spirit. In case, you have time, you may read his thoughts and More thoughts - of course, at your convenience. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 01:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

poverty in Pakistan
Please keep a watch on that article.A troll (presumably Pakistani) is trying to remove sourced information.Thanks.-Chowk 23:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

hkelkar
I would like to invite you to this discussion on the impersonation of Hkelkar at ANI. Baka man  03:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lance.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lance.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

My recent RfB
Thank you so much for your participation in my recent RfB. Though it closed with 72% support (below the required 90%), I'm still quite pleased at the outpouring of support shown by a fair percentage of the community.

I'm currently tabulating and calculating all opposing and neutral arguments to help me better address the community's concerns about my abilities as a bureaucrat. If you'd like, you can follow my progress (and/or provide additional suggestions) at User:EVula/admin/RfB notes. Thanks again! EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 04:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

BLP
Please read BLP on self-idenitification and the recent Request for Arbitration on StreetScholar before reinserting cats removed for BLP reasons. Hornplease 21:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no idea who Kathanar is, and I will review his contributions in due course. That being said, I don't appreciate your implications of bias - the cats I've removed are specifically because I think this particular cat is being misused. Please read BLP and the categorisation policy, it's very clear, and the ArbCom has just restated its importance. Hornplease 21:39, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't be an ass. Welcoming a new user to WP doesn't make him my friend, or imply I have any idea who he is or what his subsequent contributions have been. I repear, please read BLP and stop misusing categories. Hornplease 21:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You just accused me of bias, and of lying. That's not reasonable discourse. Please grow up, or you will be treated as if you have not. In future, restrict your interaction with me, or anyone here, to discussion of specific articles and policies. Hornplease 22:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2
This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The parties to the case are strongly encouraged to enter into mediation arrangements regarding any disputes over article content that may still be outstanding. All parties are reminded in the strongest possible terms that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a forum for conspiracy, personal attacks, nor the continuation of ethnic disputes by other means. "Parties who continue such behaviour, and parties who consider it their moral duty to call out such behaviour, will be hit on the head with sticks until the situation improves."

is desysopped, but is welcome to apply for reinstatement at RfA at any time. As always, administrators should not use their administrative powers in conflicts or disagreements they are involved in. Administrators who are parties to this case are reminded that they should find an uninvolved admin to determine if blocks or other actions against any other parties to the case are appropriate, and should under no circumstances take such actions themselves. Any party that violates the ban on admin actions imposed in this case will be summarily desysopped once the violation is brought to the attention of the Arbitration Committee.

This notice is given by a clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 15:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Your userpage
In light of basic principles of civility and in particular the admonition to all parties contained in Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2, I have removed some highly inappropriate comments that you had added to your userpage. Please do not repost this material or do anything like this ever again in the future. Newyorkbrad 13:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Final warning
I see that despite my request, you have again re-posted offensive material mocking your adversaries in the recently concluded arbitration case. I have again removed this material. This type of conduct will not be tolerated from any user involved in that arbitration. If you do anything like this again, I will block this account indefinitely. Newyorkbrad 18:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Dangerous-Boy, I ask you to also stop posting your veiled attacks at Rama's Arrow. The case is over now, so just drop the issue and proceed with your Wikipedia editing. Nishkid64 (talk) 18:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Once again you have placed inflammatory material on your userpage, in violation of the Arbitration Committee's well-earned admonition in Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2 that all the parties to that case should refrain from harassing one another. The edit summary you used in posting this material, "[name of user] do you see me?", makes it clear that you posted this material for the express purpose of harassing and trolling that user.

In view of the ArbCom ruling, your history of incivility throughout the case, and the prior warnings on this page, I am blocking your account indefinitely. Please note that in this context, "indefinitely" does not mean "permanently," and I will lift the block if you clearly and unambiguously promise to stop this type of behavior. However, you also need to understand that if your plans for the future consist of mocking your adversaries in the arbitration case rather than contributing to the encyclopedia, your participation will not be welcome. Newyorkbrad 00:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Dangerous-Boy, ignoring these requests and warnings proved unwise. It would make sense to appear here and agree to desist from the disputed behavior. This would greatly aid others who are right now making the case to unblock you (see WP:ANI)Proabivouac 01:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Hm...This does seem to pose a problem here. With your persecution of my userpage, I did what you said.  I kept the Roman stuff off my userpage.  I don't know how Shakespeare has anything to do with the ArbCom.  It has nothing to do with anything.  I was looking for a cool quote from wikiquote.  That looked cool.  So I put it on my user page.  Kindly put it back.  There's no reference to RA and Dagizza in it.

Also, Dagizza was stalking my edits as shown here and I wanted it to stop:, , , , ,. This where he is mocking me on my talk page. Also, his admission of guilt of having stalked other users in the arbcom.


 * ArbCom ruled on "Lack of evidence" and I haven't been blocked before. Keep in mind that I never vandalized any pages or articles or used sock or meat puppets. ArbCom ruling did not mention anything about blocks.  Nothing in enforcement. NYB seems to have a twisted view of the rulings.  Use sticks and not your block buttons.   NYB seems to have created the "ruling" unilaterally, nowhere does it mention anything about blocks.  That the Shakespearean quote was not related to anything.  I can't put anything Roman because you accuse me of using metaphors for an Arbcom.  So kindly unblock me and leave me alone.  Jesus christ....9_9....this is death of the republic.  A man can't even take a break in peace or edit his userpage.--D-Boy 08:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * If you were simply adding a cool quote and nothing more, why did you put "dagizza do u see me?" as the edit summary? Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 09:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Because he's been stalking my edits and I wanted him to leave me alone. The Shakespearean quote had nothing to do with anything.  There's no allusions to past events, people, or arbs.  it's just a quote.  No more, nothing less.  There was no offensive material on my userpage.  No policy was broken as stated User_page.  How a shakespearan quote is offensive is beyond my knowledge evidently.  Also WP:Stalk is apart WP:Policy.  How does that also go against Inappropriate content?  I was just stating policy on my user space.  There was no expression of my disdain for Brad's input as he puts it.  There was no malice to him or anyone on my userpage.  It's bordering on harrassment when there's no offensive content on the userpage and i'm getting blocked for it.  Just tell brad to leave me alone.--D-Boy 09:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't follow. How is leaving a comment directly aimed at a user who you accuse of stalking your edits likely to get him to leave you alone? Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 10:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You know, sometimes people make impulsive actions that, in hindsight, probably didn't have the effect they were hoping for... ugen64 10:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

--D-Boy 10:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I fear the wrath of the ArbCom should I unblock you and they dislike it (I'm only half-joking), but I think an unblock would be suitable here. ugen64 10:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I fear no one. But I'm not convinced that D-Boy is telling the truth above. The edit comment is pretty damning.Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 10:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I see nothing damning about it - if I were one to care about users stalking me (and I'm not), I think I would have done something similar... after all some of us are more impulsive than we should be. ugen64 10:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If anyone unblocks this user, it should be User:Newyorkbrad. In my personal opinion, he should not. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 11:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * uh, the edit comments show that I'm telling the truth, Theresa. the history shows that i've compiled with the Brad's demands throughly.  Again, Shakespearean quote had nothing to do with anything.  There's no allusions to past events, people, or arbs. Shakespearean quote had nothing to do with anything.  There's no allusions to past events, people, or arbs.  the quote does not break any policy as stated above nor does it target anyone.  Also, Theresa, you have a wikilink on your page that directly goes to child porn which has no education value and a statement Great sex with someone who really loves me.  I'm being blocked for a quotation from Shakespeare.  That's somewhat hipocritical.  If I did anything wrong, it was not going to ANI with allegations that dagizza me instead of putting it my dit summary.--D-Boy 11:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Also, Theresa, it says on your user page that you believe in absolutely no censorship.  Looks what's happening to me.  I put my userpage Gaul has fallen. Pompey has fled. Cato has retired., You will find rest from vain fancies if you perform every act in life as though it were your last., The merciless Macdonald (Worthy to be a rebel, — for, to that, The multiplying villainies of nature Do swarm upon him) from the Western Isles Of kerns and gallowglasses is supplied; And Fortune, on his damned quarrel smiling, Showed like a rebel's whore: but all's too weak: For brave Macbeth (well he deserves that name) Disdaining Fortune, with his brandish'd steel, Which smoked with bloody execution, Like valour's minion, Carv'd out his passage. Captain, scene ii - Macbeth .  I fail to see how any of that is offensive material.  There are no swears, no sexual content, no references to anyone on wiki.  They refer to roman history, a quote by a roman emperor, and a quote form Macbeth.  Anthony, can a man not show his love for rome as you do?  How does any of this go against wiki policy?  I complied with eveything Brad said and he's still persecuting me.--D-Boy 11:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You are being accused of using quotes as thinly veiled references to events on wiki. How does the contents of my userpage have any bearing on that? Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 13:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm not going to get embroiled in semantics and small details, such as by pointing out that all three of these quotations deal with vanquishing opponents in battle. My question for Dangerous-Boy is, if unblocked, will you stop doing this. I may be offline for a bit, so if Dangerous-Boy gives an assurance of appropriate behavior, any administrator is welcome to unblock without further consultation. Newyorkbrad 13:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, though I looked really hard, I still don't see how this is even remotely covered by the arbcom ruling. (Can somebody quote me the passage?) It seems like, even if he is gloating over something, it would only be identifiable to someone with great knowledge of the case who also was stalking him. There's really no way for it to look like anything other than quotes beyond that.
 * What's more, I don't understand what was so offensive about his last version of his userpage. That was a wonderful quote from macbeth. And the wp:stalk link was valid because he was being stalked. Frankly, brad, I think you're watching this too critically and getting too closely involved. I'll be the first to admit that d-boy's behaviour during that arbcom was less than pleasant, but, then was the time to punish him for it. That time's past. Now, he's just putting quotes on his userpage. And they're of no concern to anyone who isn't watching him like a hawk (who shouldn't be watching him like a hawk).
 * But, seriously, what specific ruling from arbcom is covered by this? (That's not a rhetorical question. It's a, uh, questional-question) Bladestorm 15:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've responded to Bladestorm both on my talk and on ANI. Newyorkbrad 16:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * (yup. I commented here first, before finding the other discussion and addressing personally. I think everything I've addressed here is being covered elsewhere Bladestorm 17:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC) )


 * Theresa, How does a Shakespearen quote on my userpage have any bearing to events of wiki? Anything I put on my user space is being looked at too critically. wp:stalk link is valid because I am being stalked.  The links I provided have shown that.  Brad, I feel any block is unreasonable.  I have complied with your demands from the beginning.   Again, Shakespearean quote had nothing to do with anything.  There's no allusions to past events, people, or arbs.   You're looking for something that isn't there.  If you can't seem to understand that, then so be it.--D-Boy 19:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Here is an idea. Will you agree not to put any quotes whatsoever by anyone at all, about any subject on your userpage for a period of say two months? That way no one can misinterpret your intentions. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 23:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I can agree to that aslong as you prevent brad from persecuting after those two months. Will I be able to put roman quotations or anything that does not go against WP:Policy after those 2 months?  I complied with his demands and he still blocked me for the shakespearan quote.  I can agree to your terms.  There was no reason what so ever for this block because I complied.--D-Boy 01:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You didn't comply, you wittily tried to make it look like you were complying, so you could act all aggrieved when somebody didn't fall for it. Stop battling. Stop game playing. Not only do we expect you to comply with the letter of the arbitration ruling, we expect you to comply with the spirit. We don't want to notice you at all unless it's for positive contributions. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 01:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I did comply. The Shakespearan quote was looked at too critically.  I have stopped battling and I've already agreed to theresa's terms.  Also, how can you expect me to follow your example when you keep typing Shut the hell up  .  At least be more civil if you expect me to be.  Jesus.  It's kind of hard to contribute positively when I haven't even vandalized one article and I'm being indef blocked for a shakespearean quote.--D-Boy 02:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You put conditions on it. You don't get to put conditions. Contrition is what's required of you now. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 03:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I have already agreed to the terms.--D-Boy 03:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I can agree to that as long as you prevent brad from persecuting after those two months. I can agree. I still haven't heard "I agree." --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 04:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Did you not read my last message? I agree.--D-Boy 07:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That's good enough for me. I am going to unblock you. I cannot prevent anyone from "persecuting" you. You've been involved in an arbitration case and you edits will likely be watched by a number of admins for a while yet. I strongly advice you not to talk to people via edit summaries - always a bad idea. Do not assume that, just because I decided to unblock you that you cannot be reblocked again by another admin. Others may disagree with my decision. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 11:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I have no objection to unblocking this user at this time and look forward to his making productive contributions to Wikipedia. As far as I am concerned, this matter is now closed. Newyorkbrad 12:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)