User talk:Dangerous Khiladi 5

Dishoom revert
Hi there, regarding your query on my talk page where you ask why I reverted this edit of yours at Dishoom, I explained in my edit summary "Unclear what this means or why it is written with all those line breaks."
 * We don't typically
 * write prose like this
 * with sentences
 * spanning multiple lines.

This bizarre writing style actually threw off my comprehension of the sentence, which contains the incorrect usage of "gets" instead of "goes", and the weird line breaks made me think "Arabian Sea team" was a team of some kind, which created a confusing syntax issue: "two cops from either side of the Arabian Sea team (do what?) for a 36 -hour man hunt". But that's the least of our concerns now, because as I look up the phrase "When India's top batsman gets missing in the Middle East", I find the same content at IMDb, which suggests to me that the content was copied and pasted into Wikipedia. You cannot do that, as all prose content is considered copyrighted. If you wanted to present the single sentence as a quotation, you'd have to wrap it in quotation marks and provide a reference so that there are no questions about plagiarism or copyright violations. But ultimately all film plots would need to conform to WP:FILMPLOT and be written from scratch in your own words between 400-700 words in length. Lastly, when you reverted my change, you didn't do anything to fix the line break problem. As a general practice, if a change you have made is reverted, click "View history" at the top of the page to review the changes. As noted, my reversion was supplemented by an explanation, so not fixing the formatting didn't do anything to address my complaint. If you wish to reply, please do so below--it's easier to keep discussions like this in one place. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Suntalilai Bhagai Lagyo Jhilkele


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Suntalilai Bhagai Lagyo Jhilkele requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 11:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dangerous Khiladi 5


A tag has been placed on User:Dangerous Khiladi 5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 11:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Disha Patani, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Disha Patani, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been or will be reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyuszika7H (talk • contribs) 14:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Sarojupreti. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 16:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: PageLock Request
Unfortunately I don't have the capacity for "locking" Wikipedia pages. Besides, the article seems to need significant improvement in reliable sources, so probably should have been left back in draft state until it was expanded. Dl2000 (talk) 02:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)