User talk:Dangerouslyinlove

A tag has been placed on Tanya Blount, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hatch68 22:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --musicpvm 00:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove source links from articles
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. - eo 17:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Artist with the most number one songs of the 21st century
A tag has been placed on Artist with the most number one songs of the 21st century, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove deletion notices on articles which you create yourself. If you wish to contest the deletion, please follow the instructions in the notice.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I see you removed the notice once more. This list refers only to pop artists. It would need references to each and every genre of popular music to be complete. Once more: Please do not remove the deletion notice. This is an unmaintainable and biased list with no text. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Number-one hits of 1993 (World)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Number-one hits of 1993 (World), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 14:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones
Please do not add a very large, copy & paste per-decade breakdown to this page. It's excessive and unnecessary for the scope of the article. Other sections of the page keep lists shortened to a top-five or top-ten and this is to ensure the article does not become to cluttered or messy. All-time records spanning 1955-present are sufficient, there is no need to break things down further. If you feel this information needs to be included please get a consensus on the Talk Page. Thanks - eo (talk) 17:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

removing sources, disruptive editing
YouTube links are not considered reliable sources.
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  - eo (talk) 10:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Aaliyah
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —  Σ  xplicit 17:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to In Between Dreams. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 10:19, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to In Between Dreams. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doutzen Kroes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Doutzen_Kroes check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Doutzen_Kroes?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)