User talk:Danharper1

June 2007
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Crumbumbling, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Coren 03:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Please do not create Crumbumbling again. Thanks. --Fang Aili talk 03:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Crumbumbling
Fang Aili, You have deleted my entry entitled crumbumbling and would like to have permission, if I may, that it be kept up. As it says it was started in the premise of making new social constructs, including openess in communication using a variety of social codes. It is a new philosophy, but I hope to make it grow, as my intentions are the same as philosophers before me; to better understand life. The philosophy itself is represented in the patterns of culture, and it is self-evident, if posted, of the struggle and evolution of communication. The internet and Wikipedia are both ivolved in the ideal of Crumbumblolgy and I hope to spead the attention of these newfound great elements in culture. I'd be happy to talk privately if you'd like. Thank you!

--Danharper1 04:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * That's a great story, but I'm not interested in playing games. Have a nice night. --Fang Aili talk 04:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Just noticed
Fang Aili, I also just noticed your message to not create it again. It probably made me seem like a jerk for ignoring that, but I just noticed it. Sorry about that. Also, I brushed up on the terms of notability and nonsense. While I can argue it's not nonsense, I know I lack terms of notability, other than several other people (yes, friends, family, teachers, pastors) that I've discussed it with. I know that doesn't meet terms of use, but I just wanted to apoligize for my ignorance on the issue. I will continue my effort to make this information notable, and hopefully get something posted about it. Sorry for the confusion.

--Danharper1 04:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello Dan. I didn't mean to offend you. Sometimes I'll run into pranksters who have their nonsense deleted, and then try to defend it in a sort of playful and quasi-eloquent way. They are bored and are trying to entertain themselves. I took you for one of those people--sorry about that. You are correct about your article. Once you are a famous philosopher and have made Crumbumbling famous, then I'm sure it will make its way to the Wiki. Thank you and have a great day. (And just a friendly hint--learn the difference between its and it's. This will serve you well--I promise.) --Fang Aili talk 13:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

'Tis well, 'tis well. I appreciate your words and heed them well. When I read the response I had figured you thought I was just messing around, which is why I didn't give up. I have actually approached a few of my philosophy professors and they were very intrigued. And this quasi-eloquent way you've constrewn: don't be fooled by my poor typing skills. I know the difference full well, it's just an error that I make pecause I usually type as fast as possible and allow whatever software to add puntuation. I normally try to avoid that, and I do normally talk like this in even the most colloquial of settings. If I seem odd, that is true, but let me apoligize if it is an obstruction, and offer to regress. I've found the value of Crumbumbling through observing communication at it's least intelligent, and as an admin I assume you would be exposed to a good deal of that. Because I believe in that value, It seems that it would be worth my time to investigate your thoughts on expression. You have already given me input on your view of the actions of bored fools. In relating it to our conversation I deduced that delinquents use similar methods of demonstration of integrity as a sincere person who has miscommunicated. On pondering this, I considered that it may be possible that the correlation between decadency and communication would not be strong. I found this article in my school's psycharticle database (http://warriornet.rc.edu:2052/WebZ/FTFETCH?sessionid=fsapp10-57612-f3f39sdk-4997j7:entitypagenum=6:0:rule=100:fetchtype=fulltext:dbname=PsycARTICLES_FT:recno=3:resultset=3:ftformat=PDF:format=BI:isbillable=TRUE:numrecs=1:isdirectarticle=FALSE:entityemailfullrecno=3:entityemailfullresultset=3:entityemailftfrom=PsycARTICLES_FT:) Thanks for your input again. --Danharper1 00:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)