User talk:Dani0rad

February 2013
Hello, I'm Srich32977. An edit that you recently made to Charles Sanders Peirce seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''You are creating redlinked categories. Please stop. For more information on how to edit Wikipedia, I recommend the tutorial.'' – S. Rich (talk) 22:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Let me explain a little more. When you changed the category, you created a redlink. That means nothing actually appears. The various people you want in the category really don't have such a category. That is why it is better to keep them in the existing bluelinked category even if you would prefer a different name for the category. The best way to fix things, if you like, is to first read up on WP:CATEGORIES and then propose a name change in WP:CFD. In a minute I will post a welcome message here for you to read up on other aspects of WP editing. – S. Rich (talk) 23:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Dani0rad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 23:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Scott Rates


The article Scott Rates has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. BC108 (talk) 19:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Rates for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Rates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scott Rates& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ResultingConstant (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Scott Rates
Hi Dani0rad, per the outcome of this recent discussion and this previous one, the article Scott Rates has again been deleted again. It has been determined that there is not enough coverage in third-party, reliable sources to prove he meets the notability guidelines. Please do not recreate the page. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)