User talk:Dani444e

January 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vatican City has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vatican City was changed by Dani444e (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873475 on 2018-01-17T09:59:42+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jørgen Leth, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 10:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Citroën, you may be blocked from editing. Jschnur (talk) 21:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.


 * concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. 87.48.131.105 (talk) 07:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2018 (UTC)