User talk:DaniJako

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bolia.com (January 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bolia.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bolia.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bolia.com Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bolia.com reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello DaniJako. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Bolia.com, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DaniJako. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, thank you for reviewing the article. I realize that I should have disclosed my relation with Bolia, this was an oversight on my part. We write and audit content for Bolia's website and our help was requested on delivering relevant information about the company in the form of a Wikipedia article. Our terms being, that we would adhere to Wikipedia guidelines. The draft is our attempt at a neutral point of view, also realizing that this is difficult with the innate COI.
 * How do you suggest that we proceed? Should we submit changes to the draft at this point?
 * Our reference point for writing this article have been the following two: JYSK and BoConcept. In terms of references, structure and relevancy these have been our guidelines.


 * Note that this is my personal account and I have no intend of submitting any articles for clients in the future (not our field of work). How do I go about making my affiliation with certain articles clear, without discrediting my submissions for other articles in the future. Should this singular article have been created from an account setup for this specific purpose? This seems even more disingenuous to me. Would I be able to disclose this relation as a non-registered user?
 * This was submitted under articles for creation to ensure that we where not breaching any Wikipedia guidelines. DaniJako (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bolia.com
Hello, DaniJako. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bolia.com, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)