User talk:DaniTownley

Please cite sources
Hi.

Thanks for your recent addition to Grand Theft Auto (series). Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability, requiring (as much as possible) that all material submitted to articles is verifiable. Could you provide references/citations for the addition you made?

If you are unsure about how to add references to articles, please leave a message at the article's talk page, providing links to the suitable references, requesting that the references be added to which part of the article, and add  to the message. Another editor will then be able to do the work for you (although we are all encouraged to be bold).

Thanks again for your contribution to Wikipedia. Happy editing!  Hermionedidallthework (talk) 19:18, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Grand Theft Auto (series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. clpo13(talk) 20:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)