User talk:Dani de santa

February 2015
Hello, I'm PhantomTech. Your recent edit to the page Pinocchio 3000 appears to have added incorrect information from a movie that no one gives a crap, so I have removed it for now, because... I don't know. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake (which I did), or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Phantom Tech (talk) 21:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your sandbox, user page and talk page
I have noticed that you are creating very in-depth infoboxes for fictional movies. I realize that it's fun, but this is a project to build a factual encyclopedia. Why not try to build a real movie article? The Wikiproject on films always wants more members! Origamiteⓣⓒ 15:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't misunderstand me; they look like a lot of fun, and you don't have to remove them. However, most of your edits are to User:Dani de santa/sandbox and User:Dani de santa, which aren't really contributing to the project of building an encyclopedia, and it's always upsetting when an editor is blocked because they're not here for the encyclopedia. Origamiteⓣⓒ 20:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Nice edits to Captain America: Civil War! I hope that you edit some other pages, too. Origamiteⓣⓒ 15:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, or continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Snuggums (talk / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

In case things weren't already clear, there is no upcoming Grand Theft Auto movie according to any reliable source. Continuing to insert this is disruptive when it is not confirmed to even exist. You WILL be reported if this keeps up. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 16:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 16:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 16:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.  Spencer T♦ C 00:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)