User talk:Daniblanco

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Daniblanco! Thank you for your contributions. I am Stijndon and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Stijndon (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Structures
Can I please draw your attention to Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing, we have been moving all structures off en-wiki, as they can be used by all wikis - so they are all located on commons, which also has a much better categorisation system, so the image you need may already be there for you, saving you some time - see commons:Category:Chemical processes and sub cats. I'll leave the image for now, as it's in the wrong format to move, I'll tag it for a re-draw. Since there is no originality in structures they are normally given the PD-chem license. Thanks for your time.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 01:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Beckmann Rearrangement.tif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beckmann Rearrangement.tif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 02:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Diphenylphosphoryl azide
Hi Daniblanco. I just wanted to let you know that I have reverted your renaming of the article diphenylphosphoryl azide. The name "diphenylphosphoryl azide" is much more commonly used than "diphenoxyphosphoryl azide". Per policy at WP:COMMONNAME I think the title should remain diphenylphosphoryl azide. If you disagree, please feel free to start a discussion (see Requested moves) get input from other editors. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610229215 your edit] to List of tallest buildings in Europe may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Cuatro Torres Business Area02.jpg|thumb|250px|Madrid, Spain]] (Madrid), Spain

Warning
Please not remove Barcelona from the article of List of tallest buildings in Europe. Your personal opinion is not enough. Also your change is absurd because as for the number of skyscrapers above 100 m (328 ft), Barcelona has a 4th place in the European Union. Barcelona has 15 skyscrapers above 100 metres and total 60 skyscrapers above 70 metres. Also your change is wrong because you entered to article third image of Madrid, yes - in article exist two pictures of Madrid. And also, in article exist pictures of cities with minimum three skyscrapers - Barcelona fully meets these requirements. Your version is completely wrong (fourfold)! and to remove Barcelona from the article must to be consensus. Please stop entered such wrong edits, such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If once again (third time) restore his version, it considered vandalism, automatically undone and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Subtropical -man  talk   (en-2)   21:12, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Nierenstein reaction mechanism.tif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nierenstein reaction mechanism.tif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 06:23, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Methylene and methylidene, etc
Hi there. Please dont be offended, but I reverted your renaming of methylenecyclopropene. We dont really adhere to official nomenclature rules in Wikipedia. We dont ignore them either. Ever so often some new editor decides that we should - e.g. ethanoic acid and such - so you are not alone. If you want to discuss the matter, please leave a note on the Talk page. Hope you continue to edit though because we like chemists. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:04, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Februart 2020: Edit summaries are essential
Especially when changing article content. I'm not a chemist; I'm tempted to revert edits which require me to catch up on my sleep before I can evaluate them. Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks!--Quisqualis (talk) 05:34, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Discuss renaming plans
It is a good idea to discuss plans or ideas for renaming articles. Otherwise a lot of time is wasted without achieving any consensus. Consensus is a key aspect in resolving differences in Wikipedia. Try Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)