User talk:Daniel.chung

August 2016
Hello, I'm Clpo13. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Billy Mitchell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. clpo13(talk) 22:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Mitchell. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Billy Mitchell was changed by Daniel.chung (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957496 on 2016-08-31T22:30:23+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Mitchell, you may be blocked from editing. GABgab 22:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 23:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm Laoris. Your recent edit to the page Jimmy Doolittle appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Laoris (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)