User talk:Daniel.jimengar

Your submission at Articles for creation: B2M Token (March 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:B2M Token and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:B2M Token, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:B2M_Token Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:B2M_Token reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:B2M Token


A tag has been placed on Draft:B2M Token, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Spencer T• C 00:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Spencer, Thanks for your message and sorry for not getting in touch sooner. I understand the G11 section and I wonder if it would be possible for you to tell me exactly how I could change the text in order to make it more encyclopedic. I think this product deserves to be in Wikipedia. Thank you very much for your attention. Daniel Daniel.jimengar (talk) 08:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Liz Read! Talk! 00:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Eki stamp, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   10:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)