User talk:Daniel/Archive/47

"3rd United States Infantry" request for mediation
I have informed the called parties that should they agree to mediation, I will agree to any demand on their part to be joined as a party to the mediation process. I believe that I have un-refuted evidence establishing the official name of that military unit as 3rd United States Infantry Regiment, published over the signature block of the commanding general of the Army at the time of publication as an official endorsement of a history of the Army of the United States. I further believe I was not named as a party because doing so is not in the interests of the party calling for mediation, given that this party referred me to the official US Army website where I discovered the 19th century secondary source (written by a unit veteran/primary source). I have been and will continue to be in contact with the FBI and United States Department of Justice as a victim in an unrelated matter concerning a recent criminal conviction on, among other charges, "fraud/false statements in general", so it is a matter of personal consistency that I am agreeable to mandatory joinder in this matter. Hotfeba 00:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I was going to suggest that you add your name to the list of parties if you think you are involved and would like to take part, but it's already been added by someone else. Cheers,  Daniel  10:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 06:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

What?
Kindly refrain from removing the comments of others from my talk page. If you think futurebird's comment was a personal attack, then perhaps you need to look up the definition. It was nothing of the sort. *x* deeceevoice 08:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I am the one who needs to look up the definition?  Daniel  08:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Interesting.  Daniel  09:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

IRC
I was just about to go home, but I've come on for a minute. What name are you under? Rebecca 09:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Daniel-Bryant.  Daniel  09:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

deleted comment
I don't really think that the comment you deleted was a "personnel attack" I stay away from that sort of thing. In fact, it was a serious question. I'm sort of in a state of shock right now because I had higher expectations for admins. I'm wondering how you came across my comment so quickly and why you thought it was a personal attack? futurebird 11:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's unneededily attacking someone. For me, that's a personal attack.  Daniel  00:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

*Whistle*
IRC please... -- DarkFalls talk 22:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Done?  Daniel  00:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

thanks
I know mediation wasn't likely, but seemed to be the best option at the time. Thanks for the effort. — BQZip01 — talk 02:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I wish you the best of luck with resolving the dispute.  Daniel  11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I have...
a warped sense of humor, but this (link removed) had me laughing out loud! Thanks for that, even if humor was not an intended side-effect, lol. Ariel ♥ Gold 03:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I removed the link for WP:BEANS :) It was part-humour, part-annoyance at people who seem to enjoy claiming that they're an administrator, support the Mariners, and have over 30,000 edits...  Daniel  03:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hee hee, I love the beans essay! I almost spit out my tea all over my keyboard the first time I read it, lol. And while I can't really fathom why someone would want to transclude your userboxes, I think that your solution was an ingenious piece of coding that solves it in one fell swoop, lol. (I might steal that some day if I ever find a need for it, lmao) Also, just want to tell you I like that you made your own userboxes. I've been meaning to do that for a while, I've made some of my own, but I hate how they are all different colors/sizes, it drives me insane, lol. Someday when I get bored I guess I'll do it, they do look quite spiffy. Anyway, thanks again for the laugh. :) Ariel ♥ Gold 03:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to think I invented the coloured-border white-background standardized theme :)  Daniel  11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
For passing Featured list candidates/List of Powderfinger awards. Keep up the good work, and just you wait, QR are coming! &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, thank you for improving Wikipedia by writing it :) QR 2-0 WP, 75:00 - looking good. Cheers,  Daniel  11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007


Automatically delivered by COBot 02:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry Sir,
Me and that member had a misunderstanding and it was resolved. For reference the base meaning of ignorance is "ignore-ance" he ignored the message and accidently deleted it. Sorry for the inconvenience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connubbialis (talk • contribs) 04:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * So it seems...  Daniel  11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 12:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Closing AfD's
After reading your essay closing this AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lehi in the Wilderness: 81 New Documented Evidences That the Book of Mormon Is a True History, I was truly impressed. I hope to emulate you. Bearian 17:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't emulate me too much, or you'll turn into a grudge-holding rogue administrator :) The correct result was achieved, so good luck! Cheers,  Daniel  02:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

FAB

 * Cool badge :) Thanks,  Daniel  11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikinews
Are you active on Wikinews anymore? ~  Sebi   [talk] 09:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not at the immediate present - exams, MedCom and stuff.  Daniel  11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: edit wars
I never broke the 3rr rule and reported him to aiv. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawnpoo (talk • contribs) 02:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Daniel.Bryant
Any chance this could be undeleted? &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 04:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not just yet.  Daniel  11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Article BB Guns
No sooner than i created the article, it was tagged for deletion. BB Guns is a legitimate person with somewhat of a famous reputation. A rising star if you will. Im requesting that this article stays on wikipedia, i am willing to make any necessary changes.

Thank you, -Rob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockstar1981 (talk • contribs) 10:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * What article? This one?  Daniel  11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Shwanpoo's At It Again
He put up a fake episode of "Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends", but I deleted it and replaced it with the proper episode as per confirmation for Cartoon Network. He's a vandal, palin and simple, and IMHO should be kicked out of Wikipedia for that. NoseNuggets 9:19 AM US EDT Oct 5 2007. —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 13:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I have absloutely no idea what you're talking about, but I suggest trying dispute resolution.  Daniel  12:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For cleaning up the stuff to do with my rfa - beat me to it every page :) -- Ben chat 13:39, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Mediation
Howdy. I'd like to follow Requests for mediation/3rd US Infantry if possible. I'd like to mediate with the medcom eventually. Regards, M er cury    13:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Follow this case as in mediate it, or just watch on?  Daniel  13:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to watch on this time, then if you are inclined, I'll mediate one with you watching. M er cury    17:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I have initiated a discussion on our private mailing list, as it's the Committee's decision as a whole to determine which offers from mediators will be accepted (as a formal Committee). I will inform you of the result of the discussion when a conclusion and consensus is reached.
 * For the Mediation Committee,  Daniel  01:13, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Reply from CO
Please see my talk page for a reply. Thanks  Carbon Monoxide   15:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  Daniel  02:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Your suggestion about complaint about Fred Bauder
So you are suggesting that registering a complaint on a Arbitration talk page of an Arbitration that was closed last February 2007 would be effective? (I ask because I have never seen any response or even acknowledgment of comments or questions made of the talk pages of Arbitrations. I do not think the arbitrators even read them at the time the arbitration is onging, nevermind eight months after it has closed.) --Mattisse 13:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I also suggested WT:RFAR. Regardless, what I'm sure of is WP:BN isn't the place for it. Cheers,  Daniel  12:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Adding users or articles to an accepted mediation request
Is it possible to add people or articles to a mediation request that has already been accepted? I would like to do both with Requests for mediation/Iraq War. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 01:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It is. Please follow these steps:-
 * Contact on his talk and ask him/her if he/she agrees to mediation with the two new parties.
 * If WLRoss does, add the parties to the list on Requests for mediation/Iraq War.
 * I'll notify them, and then they can note their acceptance/rejection of mediation.
 * We'll take it from there. Cheers,  Daniel  13:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * All the tasks appointed to me herein have come to pass. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 07:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I have notified the parties.  Daniel  10:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
As far as the whole thing goes with the username, the account in question that was blocked was named "Your My Hoe 123," and he was complaining to my about he was blocked BEFORE I told him about how I would've blocked that account (Your My Hoe) as well. I understand where the misunderstanding came from, I just wanted to inform you about this. Thanks. —Signed by KoЯn fan71 My TalkSign Here! 00:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

template
A template you have created or significantly contributed to, user17, is the subject of a discussion I have started on the village pump. —Random832 18:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Noted, thanks.  Daniel  01:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Australian RUles
Aussie Rules umpire in QLD —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aflumpire (talk • contribs) 03:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool :)  Daniel  05:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

New to VandalProof
Hi, I was recently approved by Betacommand to use VandalProof. However, once I downloaded the 136 zip file and VP137.exe file, I cannot log in. The program can locate my username and password, however, it says: "No priviliges found." Also, I clicked on the button Verify Authorisation, yet it still didn't work. Can you please help? Thanks.  σмgн gσмg  06:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Due to technical issues I'm currently a) out of the loop with the current VP issues, and b) unable to fix your problem. I suggest you contact Betacommand on his talk page. Cheers,  Daniel  00:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)