User talk:Daniel11

About the stub
Just wanted to let you know that the stub in the Canadian Beer article was mainly for someone to make easier access to the Beer and Brewery stub, rather than use the search engine. Sometimes you can type the wrong character and end up somewhere else or not at all. Elwin Blaine Coldiron 15:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

OpenCola link
Thank you for adding the proper link for the OpenCola listing in Wikibooks Recipes. Since I am something of a blithering newbie to Wikipedia. your expertise is greatly appreciated.Unidyne 23:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

From other projects
Oh trust me, many of the edits I have created have originated from seeing them on other projects, which is one of the great things about Wikipedia as we can use the help of others to make the project better as a whole. The more professional we look as well, the more respect we will get from others in Wikipedia. Thanks for the message.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 07:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Beer style chart
I'd agree, except that's what was tried a year ago and nothing's improved. Frankly, if we're going to have a disclaimer that essentially says "this chart is quite possibly wrong", we should just not have the chart. What's more, the use of a graphic discourages people from improving things, I think. If we could implement it in a table it might be better but even then it'd be a whole big bag of unsourced argument fodder. Look at Talk:Pale Ale for an example. --Stlemur (talk) 23:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Boreale.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Boreale.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Issues with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD
Thank you for expressing your concerns on the recent issues with TinucherianBot in Project Banner Tagging for WP:FOOD. I have made some comments and explainations at Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval and I am leaving this note just for your information --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 09:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Beer category decision
Hi Daniel - I'm alerting the project members to this discussion.

A discussion has been opened on changes that have been made to the existing Beer category system. The changes reverse the decision made by the Project in April 2006. The changes were based on agreement by only two people, and by a discussion that took place outside the Beer Project. There may be some merit in the changes, and to prevent future conflict it is important that there is some discussion of the matter. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beer.

How are you keeping? We haven't spoken for ages. I've been fairly quiet on the beer project for a while. Just a little nibble now and again on some beer or beer style that has caught my atention. The recent tagging incident brought me back, and it was a good opportunity to have a chat with ClockworkSoul as we hadn't spoken in a while either. There was a period when there was a lot of arguing, and I grew unhappy with that. Have things settled?  SilkTork  *YES! 14:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)  SilkTork  *YES! 14:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes. Human nature! And I agree with your comments on F&D talkpage.  SilkTork  *YES! 12:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Community forum
A Community forum has been set up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink/Article guidelines for the various Food and Drink projects to develop a set of Manual of Style guidelines for use in articles under the auspices of all the related Food and Drink WikiProjects and task forces. This would be similar to the MoS guidelines for biographies or legal articles.

Please feel free to comment.

--Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 09:50, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Glasgow smile
I have nominated Glasgow smile, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Glasgow smile&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. &mdash; KieferSkunk (talk) &mdash; 18:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Open Source Beer Project


The article Open Source Beer Project has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established and the sources are all connected to the project, which appears not to have taken off. If the article is to be retained it will need a full rewrite with proper sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dubbin u &#124; t &#124; c 16:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Commando Battalion
Hello Daniel11,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Commando Battalion for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 02:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Repeal of alcohol prohibition listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Repeal of alcohol prohibition. Since you had some involvement with the Repeal of alcohol prohibition redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WPB listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WPB. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WPB redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

"New Hampshre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Hampshre. Since you had some involvement with the New Hampshre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

"Drug bust" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Drug bust. Since you had some involvement with the Drug bust redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Not a very active user (talk) 08:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Iraqi terrorism


A tag has been placed on Iraqi terrorism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Clearly incorrect. What about ISIL?"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Terrorism in iraq


A tag has been placed on Terrorism in iraq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Clearly incorrect. What about ISIL?"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thepharoah17 (talk) 03:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

"Terrorism in iraq" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Terrorism in iraq. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 07:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

"Iraqi terrorism" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Iraqi terrorism. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

"Terrorism in Iraq" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Terrorism in Iraq. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

"Iraqi terrorists" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Iraqi terrorists. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 08:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Syndie


The article Syndie has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Beer collaboration
Template:WikiProject Beer collaboration has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of London International Hot Air Balloon Festival for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London International Hot Air Balloon Festival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/London International Hot Air Balloon Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. UtherSRG (talk) 19:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)